toxicology results will tell us even more.
Yep, it is. Point was, location of bullet entry and exit holes alone tells you next-to-nothing. Without more evidence, the autopsy results can confirm multiple and conflicting versions of what happened.
Yep, it is. Point was, location of bullet entry and exit holes alone tells you next-to-nothing. Without more evidence, the autopsy results can confirm multiple and conflicting versions of what happened.
At some point, once all evidence is in, one has to look at the most probable explanation as the most likely.
*snicker*
First, have you ever heard of Abner Louima?It all comes down to how much credence you put into a cop shooting somebody completely arbitrarily and in cold blood. I can't believe he would think he could do it without consequences.
Second, it didn't have to be "in cold blood." It only had to be unjustified. I've previously posted the standard for justified use of deadly force.
Yep, it is. Point was, location of bullet entry and exit holes alone tells you next-to-nothing. Without more evidence, the autopsy results can confirm multiple and conflicting versions of what happened.
Intolerance is a two way street.
Ever post anything on mistreatment of any minority big fella?
I'd be surprised.
So none.
I'm shocked.
Be kinda tough, seeing as how homicide is a state crime.I would want it out of Missouri. It should be a trial not a political circus or feeding him to the lions.
Be kinda tough, seeing as how homicide is a state crime.
Primary (and often exclusive) jurisdiction lies in the state where the alleged crime occurred.See now I just find that weird. I mean, I get it, criminal law is a state matter. But it's not as if the neighboring state has sanctioned or decriminalized homicide.