JLM, this vividly illustrates the difference between a liberal (me) and a conservative (you). Basically what you are saying is that you won’t support a tax increase under any circumstances.
Because you know and I know that the precondition you put up before you will support tax increases is never going to be met. There will never be equality between MPs pension and civil servants’ pension.
So in effect what you are saying is that if it is the choice between running a deficit and increasing taxes, you would rather run a deficit. Indeed, that is the position that has been taken by most conservative leaders in recent memory. Rather than increase taxes, they racked up huge deficits. Both the Bush’s, Mulroney, Reagan, Mike Harris etc.
As a liberal, I have no problem with a tax increase if it is clearly earmarked for reducing and getting rid of the deficit. That is what McGuinty did and I supported it from the very beginning. If he had frittered away the tax increase, not used it to get rid of the deficit, he would have lost my support. However, he did succeed in getting rid of the 6 billion $ Mike Harris deficit.
As a liberal, I have no problem in supporting tax increases, provided they are clearly earmarked for the elimination of the deficit.
WRONG, I'm not a conservative or liberal or any other political animal. It's the person running the show. NO I didn't say I'd rather run a deficit than increase taxes, what I did say was I'm not for increasing taxes to support waste. It's very presumptuous of you to designate me politically.
30 years ago I was N.D.P. - now I'm nothing politically.