If the refs actually call the cheap shots that the Bruins usually dish out the pp might be a hope for the Habs.
that can work for both sides, cause tampa could be ticked for the same reason against them, as i saw it.
from what i saw from the boston team this year, including playoffs, boston will rely on their depth
and efficiency, until the cheap shots start coming from the other side, so i see both teams losing
it in this series.
boston is a real good team, no weaknesses at all, and goaltending is second to none, and their coach
will not tolerate them forgetting about their responsibilities and getting dirty, he is a great
coach, has not tolerated marchand's crap over the years, has punished him for doing dumb things,
but he still has one loose screw left, so has to be watched, but he also hasn't been playing as
well as he should, and he must concentrate on his hockey so he can make good plays, as he can,
he is a good player, if he is focused properly.
i can't stand lucic, he is an arrogant fool, and if isn't being treated like the super star he thinks
he is, from the opposition, he will do the 'crotch' thing or worse.
habs are not angels, they have their own tactics, and that can get them into trouble too.
Yep, but it's sad when a person who is probably basically a decent person fails. There's worse...........Keenan for instance. Without being mean I thought I'd remind you that S.J. was going places!-

Go Habs, go!!!
,
your little general remarks don't really address anything, and i know you didn't watch the whole series
between l.a. and san jose, so all that you see is the fact that they lost, i'd like you to give me your
detailed opinion 'why' you think san jose lost.
mine is this; to begin with 'all western teams in the playoffs are capable of winning', ok?, i had a favourite,san jose, for emotional reasons, which i explained sometime back a ways.
first 3 games, jonathan quick was struggling, san jose rolled over them quite nicely, lots of goals, then
quick closed the door, and played like he can, and san jose couldn't get much by him at all, but san jose
then struggled a bit with goaltending, so that is how i see that series, if they had traded goalies the
series would have been the other way around.
now, how did you see the series, or does winning and losing thoroughly explain everything to you.
and no, you weren't being mean, i do understand that your comments never
come from the play or just how teams are going, but from cute little
sayings that to me, don't explain anything.
you knew i was cheering for san jose, and they lost, now i will cheer for
another team, has nothing to do with what team will win or lose, as
ALL western teams are good enough to win.