Try reading the fufkkng post you stupid fuk. You get what you ask for and then you can't even reply to it. What a stunned **** you are lol
Try reading the fufkkng post you stupid fuk. You get what you ask for and then you can't even reply to it. What a stunned **** you are lol
Fuk you you little troll. You did everything but reply to the on topic part and then try to chastise me for being off topic. You really are fukking insane aren't you. lol Go ahead copy the words below and the expand on how it is 'right'.I read the post. You didn't answer Les's question. All you did was deflect, which is all it seems you are good at.
Fuk you you little troll. You did everything but reply to the on topic part and then try to chastise me for being off topic. You really are fukking insane aren't you. lol Go ahead copy the words below and the expand on how it is 'right'.
1:18:40-1:19:00 for starters
40:00 Soviet help for the Nazi empire but not a peep about how the Western banks were financing them to the hilt
How's trying to minimize it, make sure you blame the right ones and so far the documentary is more than a little slanted.In all they killed and starved 17 MILLION Ukranians. Don't talk to me and try to miminize what they did!
Your brain shoved up a gnats *** would be like putting a BB in a boxcar so my 'pea-sized brain' is functioning a lot better than you you fuking parrot. If Germany is buying lots of Soviet military equipment where did they get the money, the US and that would have been paid for via grain shipments to the West when their citizens would have been in line for that food. You think Stalin 'forced' those grain sales to the West? Prove it.Still haven't answered the question. The small few seconds you mention in an hour and 20 min movie that you state is not true, without any proof to back up your assertion, then assertion is discounted and you still haven't answered the question.
I see, that once again, you are deflecting by bringing up what some other "organization" did. Doesn't matter what the western banks did or didn't do. This is about what the Soviets and Russians have done. Do try to keep that little pea brain of yours on track.
Refresher courses don't hurt. And there's always a chance that someone can provide a unique perspective.
Yep.Any errors in this 'movie review'?
Movie Magg: The Soviet Story (Labvakar/Perry Street Advisors, 2008)
Nice start now kindly point them out.Yep.
Fuktard? I just watched the entire movie and there was absolutely no mention of Afghanistan or Iraq. The entire movie is about the USSR and Germany and their relationship during the 2nd world war.1:18:40-1:19:00 for starters Would you like to see the mass killing that have happened in Iraq and Afghanistan that includes lots of women and children and babies in just the last 10 years and now show me something similar that Russia has done in that same time-frame. (2000- 2014)
Go ahead Gerr you can be the first fuktard to promote the error in that short segment as being entirely factual. To show you have watched it post a time to a segment you think is totally accurate. (that has some relevance to this century)
I don't give a crap about what you are saying about the US, Afghanistan, or Iraq. It has sweet fuk all to do with this film.Afghanistan, Iraq Wars Killed 132,000 Civilians, Report Says | Danger Room | Wired.com
Since the US is the force behind the Syrian war there is another 130,000 civilian deaths the US has caused this century.
Go ahead brag up the West it only show that you support terrorism as long as you are the ones creating the terror amongst civilians.
I was watching it again after skimming through it to find something about Afghanistan. If you want to comment then use the two time stamps I provided or did I just pull them out of thin air?Fuktard? I just watched the entire movie and there was absolutely no mention of Afghanistan or Iraq. The entire movie is about the USSR and Germany and their relationship during the 2nd world war.
You haven't watched this nor have you checked on any of the claims in it.
I don't give a crap about what you are saying about the US, Afghanistan, or Iraq. It has sweet fuk all to do with this film.
I repeat, where are the errors in the film? What mistakes have the producers made in claiming Soviet Russia as bad or worse than Nazi Germany?
I repeat my B. Bunny quote, "Ah, whatta maroon".
How's trying to minimize it, make sure you blame the right ones and so far the documentary is more than a little slanted.
Maybe you better investigate the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic as being the ones that caused the famine and deaths rather than it being a Russian inspired policy.
Collectivization in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
First of all, the beginning of your statement doesn't make sense.
If you believe Wiki as the whole truth and nothing but the truth????
Let me guess, whatever I post from whatever source it is it is flawed if it doesn't jive with you conceived view of events. The last article isn't wiki related and it says the rulkers of the Ukraine gave the peasants a garden plot and that is how they were supposed to live, by growing their own food. When that wasn't enough they starved and died because all the grain that was grown was destined for the west by prearrangement. How did the west get the rights to the grain before the people of the Ukraine if it wasn't with the blessing of the Ukrainians who were the Government of the time? Were the people kept so poor that they couldn't buy any grain or was there no grain to buy at any price. If it is the latter then whoever was demanding the grain is the ones that caused the deaths, that isn't that hard to figure out. The question then becomes, why was the West entitled to the grain over the citizens?First of all, the beginning of your statement doesn't make sense.
If you believe Wiki as the whole truth and nothing but the truth????
Well, you are off topic. The film has fukall to do with Afghanistan or Iraq and everything to do with WW2.Fuk you you little troll. You did everything but reply to the on topic part and then try to chastise me for being off topic.
Flatout bullsh|t. The film isn't about American, British, Chinese, Nigerian, or whatever other country had a hand in the relationship between the USSR and Germany in the few years before 1941. The film's about Soviet Communism and Soviet-German collaboration before 1941, so can your twists and contortions.1:18:40-1:19:00 for starters
40:00 Soviet help for the Nazi empire but not a peep about how the Western banks were financing them to the hilt
Then it is well short of a documentary about the USSR then.Well, you are off topic. The film has fukall to do with Afghanistan or Iraq and everything to do with WW2.
Flatout bullsh|t. The film isn't about American, British, Chinese, Nigerian, or whatever other country had a hand in the relationship between the USSR and Germany in the few years before 1941. The film's about Soviet Communism and Soviet-German collaboration before 1941, so can your twists and contortions.
I have no idea what film you are watching, but I checked your time stamps and Afghanistan and Iraq are not mentioned in the film shown in the OP.I was watching it again after skimming through it to find something about Afghanistan. If you want to comment then use the two time stamps I provided or did I just pull them out of thin air?
Holy crap. WHat don't you get about the "Soviet Communism and Soviet-German collaboration before 1941" part.If they say the Soviets were selling arms to Germany how does that make them bad in that they weren't directing where Germany should use them. Not likely a nation is going to sell arms to a country so they cam be attacked by that same country.
WTF does that have to do with the discussion? I repeat, this is about the USSR and Germany in the few years before 1941.If you don't like Russia go get Crimea back by way of a referendum, that'll show em who's the boss eh.
That's immaterial to the topic.Why did the West get the grain, repayment for money lent?
Again, this is immaterial to the topic.Who do you think will suffer again when the IMF wants the grain to pay the interest on the loan they float to what remains of the Ukraine? It certainly won't be the 3% that the West allows to live in luxury.
It's well short of a doc. about the entire history of the USSR but it doesn't claim to be. It claims to be about Soviet Communism and Soviet-German collaboration before 1941. Why the fuk can;t you get that through that f'n vacuum between your ears?Then it is well short of a documentary about the USSR then.
I did. Geeeez I've seen lead ingots less dense than you.The two timestamps, care to comment on the content or are rants all you know how to do?
I did.Don't be shy Gilbert just comment on what is in the film at those two mentioned times, not that hard of a task. (how many posts do you need to do before you latch onto that task?
Like I said a few times now, there is nothing in those time slots that has anything to do with what you were gibbering about.More like you never will, as usual with your troll like persona.)
Don't be shy Gilbert just comment on what is in the film at those two mentioned times, not that hard of a task. (how many posts do you need to do before you latch onto that task? More like you never will, as usual with your troll like persona.)
He can't. It's why he has continually avoided the original question I posed to him.Why should he? Prove that the sections are false as you have asserted.
It's a piece of propaganda. Is there any errors in this film when the US and England decided yo kill 100,000 or so civilians just to show the USSR how they will fight wars from now on. That was the 3rd city they burnt to the ground. Tell me again how nobel the West is compared to the USSR.