The amendments to the ACA that passed through budget reconciliation rather than conference committee reconciliation (proper order) eliminated the aforementioned items of graft that were so egregious that the House of Representatives balked at passage of the corrupt Senate legislation. The reallocation of funds was incidental. Your argument is like the tail wagging the dog because it elevates form over substance. There is no getting around the fact that proper order was not used by the Democrats because they wanted to circumvent the election of Scott Brown. Thus, they had an improper purpose in resorting to the budget reconciliation process instead of the conference committee reconciliation process.
Well, no, the reallocation of funds was exactly what the bill was intended to do.
You can attach any rationale to the changes that you want, the fact is that the legislation didn't do anything other than adjust how much money was being spent. There is nothing in the bill about corruption. There are no non-budgetary changes that would affect any other pork barrel spending item.
Unfortunately pork is a big problem in US politics. Wrangling over specific pork barrel items is not a big stand against corruption, it is everyday work Washington.
And? Did they?
How did Scott Brown vote again?
Lol, do we really need to go through this again?
The GOP made it clear that they would not allow any legislation to pass through the senate. Scott Brown was very clear that he would block it.