I agree but there's one other aspect. N.H.L. season is pretty long and intense with 82 games and a possibility of 110 games. For the players that go to the Olympics, it's pretty exhausting, for the ones that don't it has to be an interruption of their momentum. I don't know what the answer is other than I think the N.H.L. commitment has to take precedence.
the reason bettman/nhl are considering 'not' allowing nhl in olympics in the future has nothing to do with
the 'care' of the players, but everything to do with money. the nhl loses millions during that break,
and each g.m. and owner has to scramble during that time because there is no profits from their nhl teams.
the ioc has hundreds of millions, (like a big corporation) and the nhl want financial support from the
ioc to make up for that big loss of income.
so, look for some sort of negotiations, sort of like the nhl/players union lock out to happen after this
olympics, leading up to the next olympics, in which time the nhl will hold off till they are satisfied with
a financial agreement.
that is the way i understand this situation.
before, canada and the u.s. was allowed to play in the olympics, only amateurs could
participate, while all the rest of the europeans/russians, etc. looked
after their players financially, they were pros in reality, but put forward
as amateurs, it was a farce.
i can't see that happening, it would be a huge leap backward, so i'm not
sure what will happen if nhl do not go, maybe it would jump to the lower
leagues of pros, or ex nhl pros playing in the khl, or ahl players, or a gathering of all of them to make up a team, don't know.