no of course but they are a part of our democratic process here, hard to get rid of, hard to change...but a good indicator that we need to explore other options and look for changeand the senate is not democratically elected. It is appointed.
no of course but they are a part of our democratic process here, hard to get rid of, hard to change...but a good indicator that we need to explore other options and look for changeand the senate is not democratically elected. It is appointed.
That would be a perfect combination to get out of debt. Chow can be in charge of raising taxes and Ford can look after cutting useless spending.
interesting; politicians, should they be given the benefit of the doubt, or should they need to prove they are worthy of our trustAssuming he's also a changed man.
Hmmm... Well, I like ot give people the benefit of the doubt, but I sure hope people don't re-elect him without him showing some kind of credentials on the changed front.
If he gets any fatter that might kill him , too much to eat at home obviously.
Assuming he's also a changed man.
I don't have the answer because it is not an easy straightforward analysis with a simple solution...it needs to be something that evolves and changes according to need. I doubt there are many who cannot see that we have outgrown our current system. The senate mess is just a symptom of the trouble we are in.
interesting; politicians, should they be given the benefit of the doubt, or should they need to prove they are worthy of our trust
Peolpe, don't change.
IMHO anyways.
Peolpe, don't change.
IMHO anyways.
People can change, but it must be a conscious decision through effort and outside help.
Obviously by your continuing defense of him you believe it to be Ford not just "possibly Ford". I have no investment in his success or his failure. However, I'll tell you right now...he is a huge gamble due to his personal problems. I know you keep advocating for him as though you have a personal stake in this. It's like you want to believe in him and have closed your eyes to his failures. I do not base my vote on emotion but rather what has been done. I do not like how he has handled himself. Although I like some of the things he has done in the past, I would not vote for someone who has displayed himself in the manner in which he has unless he was cleaned up.Political parties are pretty much meaningless (look at David Emerson who has been both a Liberal and a Conservative) you want the guy in who can do the job properly. That is possibly Ford!
the last time ford ran, he nearly killed a councillor. :shock:Ford to run in October
Yes October is a long way off. A lot can happen between then and now.That's why I said I hope people don't re-elect him without showing some credentials on the changed front. i just meant I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt only to the degree that he's prepared to prove he's changed. But he still has to take the next step beyond that. He hasn't shown that so far, though Otcober is still a while away.
People can change, but it must be a conscious decision through effort and outside help.
So there is no such thing as recovered alcoholics or recovered drug addicts in your mind. They are still the same irresponsible people they were when they were in the bottle or on the drugs.
omg, you are too funnythe last time ford ran, he nearly killed a councillor. :shock:![]()
Alcoholism is not necessarily due to a sense of irresponsibility. But yes, I would say non-drinking alcoholics are still the same person. I don't think people change.
I'm glad to say that, once again, you're wrong. I know both/ Recovered alcoholics and recovered drug addicts, and they are NOT the same people.
and yes, substance abuse and addiction is all about irresponsibility.
People don't change.
That is a remarkably depressing statement. So it's therefore impossible for anyone to ever improve themselves in any manner? No one can ever be rehabilitated? The moment you make a mistake, an error, go down the wrong path, you're screwed for the rest of your life?
Change has to be at least a possibility otherwise what the hell is the point in even trying?
That is a remarkably depressing statement. So it's therefore impossible for anyone to ever improve themselves in any manner? No one can ever be rehabilitated? The moment you make a mistake, an error, go down the wrong path, you're screwed for the rest of your life?
Change has to be at least a possibility otherwise what the hell is the point in even trying?
the last time ford ran, he nearly killed a councillor. :shock:![]()