Yep. This is why Putin insists only the UN can act on Syria:
Russia, not U.S., makes UN look bad on Syria: Editorial | Toronto Star
On July 19, Russia vetoed a resolution calling on Assad to implement UN Envoy Kofi Annan’s peace plan, saying it would “fan the flames of confrontation,” as if the war could get any worse. The vote went 11 to 2 against Russia, with 2 abstentions. As Britain’s UN ambassador rightly noted, Russia and China failed in their duty as veto-wielding states to help resolve the crisis, failed to support the UN peace plan and failed to help the Syrian people. The French were even more bluntly critical, saying that Russia clearly wanted to “win time for the Syrian regime to smash the opposition.”
Earlier, on Feb. 4, Russia also vetoed a resolution calling on Assad to call off his troops and accept a “Syrian-led political process” to end the war, claiming it sent an “unbalanced” message. That vote went 13 to 2 against Russia. And last Oct. 4, Russia vetoed a similar resolution, saying it didn’t like its “accusatory tone.” That vote was 9 to 2 against Russia with 4 abstentions.
At every turn, Putin’s government has abused its Security Council veto to overrule a strong consensus in favour of action to end the war, rendering the council irrelevant. Putin has given Assad political cover, blocked efforts to force a ceasefire, and shielded a despot from paying a price for his violence. Putin’s demand that Obama respect the United Nations is a joke, when he has so consistently undermined it.
Russia, not U.S., makes UN look bad on Syria: Editorial | Toronto Star