Obama has a chance to step back from bombing Syria. He should grab it | National Post
On Sept. 4, Obama made a lame attempt to back away from his red-line language. “I didn’t set a red line,” he said at a news conference in Stockholm. “The world set a red line.” The suggestion was that Obama’s August, 2012 declaration was not made as a president, but as a sort of emissary from the human race itself. No one bought it.
But two developments could give Obama an honourable out.
First, Congress seems set to reject the President’s force-authorization request: In recent weeks, legislators have had time to survey their constituents on the Syria question, and the response has been decidedly negative. Once the vote is held, and Obama loses, he can deliver an I’m-more-disappointed-than-angry speech, bow to the will of the people, and blame democracy for his inaction.
But what’s to be done with Syria’s chemical weapons? Cue the Russians, who now say they have a “concrete” plan to place Syrian chemical agents under international control — a plan that Syria itself said it would accept.