Why so Syriaous?

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,181
14,640
113
Low Earth Orbit
They bought and paid for all the armaments their selves or did US Christian pigs get suckered into footing the bill? So is Israel going to take in the Christian refugees even though they too are trying to rid themselves of Christianity many who fled Iraq and the safety of Saddam and went to Syria? Without Assad they are toast.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Lets see... Syria uses Russian MIGs, Russian tanks, Russian BMPs, Russian artillery, Russian AA.... did I leave anything out?

And I am enjoying the slow grind on both sides. Assads regime and the jihadist.

These guys are enjoying it too!

 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,181
14,640
113
Low Earth Orbit
Soviet era? 5 more years and Soviet era will be an antique.

Keep trying and crying.

If Russia was giving them modern freebies they'd kick Israels azz.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,181
14,640
113
Low Earth Orbit
I know you have you're 'Merican pride going on and that is OK but facts are facts. If they didn't get so much aid, they'd be a third world country with zero resources. They can't even feed themselves. They have no crop land.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Facts are facts indeed. I am under no illusion that Israel could survive w/o Western help... but the FACT is they do have the help and they survive.

Much to the chagrin of others. ;)
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Facts are facts indeed. I am under no illusion that Israel could survive w/o Western help... but the FACT is they do have the help and they survive.

Much to the chagrin of others. ;)
So if 'aid' is more than alright for them why do their 'partners in crime' all cry so hard when others in the area do the same thing, while paying for it out of their own pockets?
What is going on is no different than the US using Iraq to attack Iran in 1980, a war with a proxy military. Maybe when they lose in Syria they will come to the US for another round of 'installing democracy'.

These guys are enjoying it too!

Here is a vid about 'them' in action.

How the Jews Treat Christians in Israel - It's Serious! - YouTube
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
So if 'aid' is more than alright for them why do their 'partners in crime' all cry so hard when others in the area do the same thing,

Who's crying?

while paying for it out of their own pockets?
That's funny.

What is going on is no different than the US using Iraq to attack Iran in 1980, a war with a proxy military.
Oh brother... there he goes again.

Maybe when they lose in Syria they will come to the US for another round of 'installing democracy'.
Assad? That ship has sailed.


Looks like a guy was asking for trouble and found it don't you think?

And I watched it twice... not a word about him being Christian. You should check your material before you post and you would not look so stupid each and every time.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
You said the Russian defense pact was to prevent war. The Syrians are knee deep in war.
A war caused by outside influences. It won't be hard to tell when the newer weapons that have been dropped off start to get used.

Oh I forgot... you jump from point to point when you lose.

As I said... jumping around
Not as often as the 'rebel government' jump from country to country. You would think visiting Syria would be on their list of 'things to do', apparently not.



Last Modified: 24 Apr 2011 23:03 now show it was the Government rather than the rebels. There are lots newer ones that show it is only the rebels that are slaughtering civilians.

What a drain on the Assad regime this will be.
Not nearly as much as it is costing the Arab League and NATO


29th Century?
A typing error, you are too stupid to even figure that one out?


Yet here they are today! That is the stinger eh?
If the last 65 years is how they normally act it is no wonder England kicked the bankers out for 350 years. Considering what the Rothschild plan has caused since 1880 they should be all me on Madagascar with the rest of the world keeping the waters chummed up.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
A war caused by outside influences. It won't be hard to tell when the newer weapons that have been dropped off start to get used.

And all along you've been saying it was Israel and NATO.

Keep up the dance of the owned MHz.


Last Modified: 24 Apr 2011 23:03 now show it was the Government rather than the rebels. There are lots newer ones that show it is only the rebels that are slaughtering civilians.

Keep going! What else? (What a joy it is watching you implode.)


Not nearly as much as it is costing the Arab League and NATO

Oh yes it is. Syria is in ruins. The Rebs are using basic small arms save what they capture. The destroyed infrastructure alone will cost billions. Who would want to rule over rubble?


A typing error, you are too stupid to even figure that one out?

Well I know you as being stupid enough to make such a claim. It is no different than the other fantasies you come up with.


If the last 65 years is how they normally act it is no wonder England kicked the bankers out for 350 years. Considering what the Rothschild plan has caused since 1880 they should be all me on Madagascar with the rest of the world keeping the waters chummed up.

JOOOOS! JOOOOS!
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Assad? That ship has sailed.

Looks like a guy was asking for trouble and found it don't you think?

And I watched it twice... not a word about him being Christian. You should check your material before you post and you would not look so stupid each and every time.
Assad is up for election in 2014 and then he has a 7 year term and then he can't run again. Do you not keep up with the results of Syrian elections, oh wait this is your form of 'democracy'

(in part)
Le Nouvel Observateur, 15-21 January 1998. Translated by Bill Baum. It has been circulated widely, but this at The South Asian Exchange Net appears to be the original source. It was a short interview, appearing (they say) only in the French edition
Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
B: It isn’t quite that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn’t believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don’t regret anything today?
B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
Hidden history of our first step into the Afghanistan War. It’s still important for us to understand. | Fabius Maximus


Looking for trouble for asking for a political view? Perhaps the Jews are just wound a little too tight for the modern world..

Meet Judy Joo...


I can only imagine what the math question is.
Is this more than 6"?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,181
14,640
113
Low Earth Orbit
Looking for trouble for asking for a political view? Perhaps the Jews are just wound a little too tight for the modern world.
Wound too tight or are enjoying the benefits of imposed guilt and the anti-semite crap that is freaking insane.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
And all along you've been saying it was Israel and NATO.

Keep up the dance of the owned MHz.
At least I have a leg to stand on, you just wallow around in your own **** and think it is paradice.

Keep going! What else? (What a joy it is watching you implode.)

Syrian Rebels Murder Civilians & Media Blames Assad Government - YouTube

Oh yes it is. Syria is in ruins. The Rebs are using basic small arms save what they capture. The destroyed infrastructure alone will cost billions. Who would want to rule over rubble?
So small arms killed all the ones at the University and over 100 in Damascus, you really are fully ****ing eluded aren't you?

Well I know you as being stupid enough to make such a claim. It is no different than the other fantasies you come up with.
Here are your rebel heroes.

The referenced graphic clip I removed can be found on YouTube if you care to search it out:

FSA Barbaric Massacres against 230+ Abducted Civilians in Homs (18+)

Loc


JOOOOS! JOOOOS!
I love it when you do that, shows what is your biggest and best argument. What a ****ing tool you are, lol.

Wound too tight or are enjoying the benefits of imposed guilt and the anti-semite crap that is freaking insane.
They are doing the Rothschild bidding, tools. People looking for peace can find it in less than 65 years so there is another agenda or part to their plan that involved them recreating the Israel of the Bible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Assad is up for election in 2014 and then he has a 7 year term and then he can't run again. Do you not keep up with the results of Syrian elections, oh wait this is your form of 'democracy'

When the elder Assad died on on 10 June 2000, Bashar was appointed leader of the Ba'ath Party and the Army, and was elected president unopposed in what the government claimed to be a massive popular support (97.2% of the votes), after the Majlis al-Sha'ab (Parliament) swiftly voted to lower the minimum age for candidates from 40 to 34 (Assad's age when he was elected). On 27 May 2007, Bashar was approved as president for another seven-year term, with the official result of 97.6% of the votes in a referendum without another candidate.

97.6% of the vote WITHOUT another candidate!

That's democracy for you! Mhz style!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bashar_al-Assad#cite_note-29


Keep going! This is great!

Here are your rebel heroes.

.

tsk, tsk

At least I have a leg to stand on, you just wallow around in your own **** and think it is paradice.

.

Where is it?

paradice?

 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
When the elder Assad died on on 10 June 2000, Bashar was appointed leader of the Ba'ath Party and the Army, and was elected president unopposed in what the government claimed to be a massive popular support (97.2% of the votes), after the Majlis al-Sha'ab (Parliament) swiftly voted to lower the minimum age for candidates from 40 to 34 (Assad's age when he was elected). On 27 May 2007, Bashar was approved as president for another seven-year term, with the official result of 97.6% of the votes in a referendum without another candidate.

97.6% of the vote WITHOUT another candidate!

That's democracy for you! Mhz style!


Keep going! This is great!
Yes it is great to see you don't have a clue as to when the last elections were and what was voted in

(in part)
The new Syrian constitution of 2012, approved in popular referendum, introduced multi-party system without guaranted leadership of any political party.[1] In a new article 88, it introduced presidential elections and limited the term of office for the president to seven years with a maximum of one re-election.[2]
Elections in Syria - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If Iran hadn't canned the US installed Shaw in '79 it would be a 60 year rule for him. Your delusions run deep.


Wow, same attitude of the West over Dresden. Goes to show how little you have mentally progressed in 65 years. (downhill is a better term actually)

alrighty comrades