Homosexuality

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
I'm pretty sure Jesus could. At the very least, I'm sure he would try to answer the question (which is a lot more than you have attempted)

Perhaps if you were willing to listen. From what I have gathered in your posts you would be deaf to his teachings.
Yes I know.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Who said I've enhanced anyone's knowledge. I've simply asked a question that nobody has given a good answer to. Why do you have a problem with people asking questions...or is it just a problem when people ask questions you don't like?

The thread is on homosexuality, you changed course to a completely unrelated subject- pedophilia which has nothing to do with what Gerry was looking for.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Again you lower the bar of reasonable discussion. Yes I know- I will hear that click shortly.



So Cannuck Stand up and rebut.Your Reds are a sign of well I will leave it at that



So Cannuck Stand up and rebut.Your Reds are a sign of well I will leave it at that

Another one.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I'm pretty sure Jesus could. At the very least, I'm sure he would try to answer the question (which is a lot more than you have attempted)

I am going to answer your question - " Could somebody provide a verse where Jesus is cited as condemning pedophilia?"

NO I can not provide a verse. If you want to discuss a different subject from what Gerry laid out, open a new thread pertaining to the matter.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
I am going to answer your question - " Could somebody provide a verse where Jesus is cited as condemning pedophilia?"

NO I can not provide a verse. If you want to discuss a different subject from what Gerry laid out, open a new thread pertaining to the matter.

It's not a different subject matter. It strikes at the heart of the OP. I understand you can't grasp the concept. That's OK.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
I am going to answer your question - " Could somebody provide a verse where Jesus is cited as condemning pedophilia?"

NO I can not provide a verse. If you want to discuss a different subject from what Gerry laid out, open a new thread pertaining to the matter.

Good point. He can also add all the other things as well.

Yes I know.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Do you have links for the statement of scientists that have or do not have religious beliefs. Otherwise it is opinon
There's lots of material out there, mainly from the U.S. and the U.K., on surveys of scientists' religious beliefs. The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (pewforum.org) is the most active source I know of, here's a report on one of their surveys: Pew Survey: A Huge God Gap Between Scientists and Other Americans - God & Country (usnews.com) That shows about a third of scientists to be theists, and there's another one somewhere that sampled the top level of scientists, members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. I haven't seen that one online, I've seen it reported in books I've read. In that elite group the percentage of theists drops into single digits, if my memory is correct. I'll try to find that.
Based upon logical deduction, the amount of planets in the billions that could/can support life - We cannot be alone.
That's not a deduction, it's at best an induction, though the way you phrased it looks like just an assumption. We certainly could be alone, and we don't have the data to justify concluding that we aren't, the only thing we can say with certainty is that sentient life exists on at least one planet. We have no idea how common or rare it might be. Single celled life appeared on earth almost as soon as conditions made it possible, so that step might be relatively easy, but it took almost another 3 billion years for multicellular life to get going, so that step might be very difficult, and thus rare. Moreover, given that the cosmos is such as to permit sentient life to develop, somebody had to be first, maybe it's us.

But we're getting pretty far off the topic of the OP.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
It's not a different subject matter. It strikes at the heart of the OP. I understand you can't grasp the concept. That's OK.

" I'm having a problem finding citations from the New Testament where Christ condemned homosexuality. Anyone want to help me out?"

Where do you see "pedophilia" mentioned in the above O.P.? Perhaps you want to discuss tonsilitis while you're about it!
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
" I'm having a problem finding citations from the New Testament where Christ condemned homosexuality. Anyone want to help me out?"

Where do you see "pedophilia" mentioned in the above O.P.? Perhaps you want to discuss tonsilitis while you're about it!

I don't see pedophilia or tonsillitis in the OP. That's the point. Jesus never mentioned either. According to Gerry, they must be good.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I don't see pedophilia or tonsillitis in the OP. That's the point. Jesus never mentioned either. According to Gerry, they must be good.

You missed the whole point. A lot of "religious" zealots try to peddle the bullsh*t that homosexuality is evil because it says so in the Bible. Gerry was simply asking where Jesus said that. Not rocket science. Pedophilia was never the issue until you tried to make it one.
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
I read a book written by an author by the name of Greene, in our BC public library over10 years ago, Today this book is nowhereto be found, even on the internet. It must have been censored. The book went back into Catholic history during the Jerusalem crusades where same sex marriage was condoned and performed by the Catholic Church for knights fighting the crusades. It was only years after the crusades ended that the Catholic Church repealed same sex marriage.

A gay girlfriend told me she has studied the bible and the old testament mentions men must not laydown with men as they would with a women, but this may have been for health reasons as the statement was written with other health factors such as not to consume meat. Nowhere in the bible does it say women cannot have sexual relations with other women. So being a lesbianis not a sin whereas *n*l sex is.


If anyonecan find this book from Greene about the church once condoning marriage between gay men will own a very powerful and priceless book.

good luck with your search

There have been many gods and religions over the existance of mankind, but there is only one common denominator of all gods and religions which is that of spirit. Why do we need gods or religion before we can respect our spirit? Gods do not own our spirit. How we choose to use spirit is what makes spirit divine. Spirit is a state of being. Time to get rid of religion who use the Bible, Koran, and Torah to judge others and prevent the masses from connecting with their spirit. - Just my thoughts...........



The Church has NEVER condoned homosexuality.. it has always held the sacrament of marriage as sacred and unsullied, bestowed by God on one man and one woman, to the exclusion of all others, and until death do they part.

The Judaic precedessors of the Christianity did the same.. in the Old Testament..starting in the Pentateuch (the original 5 books of the Bible).. with Leviticus (18:22) labelling homosexuality as an abomination.. it has never varied.

There's a lot of historical revisionism going on now to rewrite Scripture.. and the Church's teaching on homosexuality.. but all originate in the political agendas of the homosexual lobbies.. not the Church.

Your comments on 'Spirit' look oddly like some of the Heresies.. founded in paganism.. which the Church has fought throughout its history.. notably Gnosticism and Catharism.. which deems matter and spirit to be of different origins.. and not integral to God's intent.




 
Last edited:

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,866
14,427
113
Low Earth Orbit
That's nice, but considering the kind of sloppy evidence and arguments it accepts for its canonization procedures, that's not much of a recommendation.
What does that have to do with life off our planet being accepted by the Vatican? Catholics even agree with evolution and don't stand behind the intelligent design idea either. The RC has never condemned Darwin's theory.

You and I both are fully aware of the amazing aspects of self-assembly of crystaline structures in inorganic and organic chemistry.

Order out of chaos of any sort in the Universe is a total mind **** and you can't deny that but for a bunch of junk that remained from an explosion in a vaccum to be sitting here having this conversation is a mind **** I don't think science will ever be able to explain until we can poke our heads into the next dimension.

What gives our dimension that little slice of order that has learned to manipulate matter? If something of intelligence frmo another dimension is playing around in this one, then the ancient theory of God is sort of a truth.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
What does that have to do with life off our planet being accepted by the Vatican?
As I said in a previous post, that's an unjustifiable conclusion from the evidence. The Vatican routinely accepts things as true on the basis of the flimsiest of evidence, or no evidence at all, and rejects things that ARE true and supported by voluminous evidence.
The RC has never condemned Darwin's theory.
It certainly has. LT93 - Early Vatican Responses To Evolutionist Theology