And the subject isn't about fairy tales? There's no shred of evidence to suggest any gods, demons, fairies, etc. are any more than fantasies in the first place, yet people have been believing in such things since cognitive thought first popped into craniums.
Whose biggest question? IMO, all perspectives are helpful, but there are degrees of helpfulness.
It's only harmful to those who think we are anything other than animals, albeit animals with a capacity for deep thought.
Those desires are subjective and sin is relative.
I prefer "misled" or "delusional".
I suppose it can if it rocks the basis of their beliefs. But people once believed that tomatoes were poisonous. So here we are today eating tomatoes. The harm seems to have been done to the belief in something silly. Have we all not benefited from that harm to the belief?
No more than there is for beliefs in deities and the like. But the probabilities are a larger part than actual evidence so far.
See, the Bible suggests that some magician poofed everything into existence and poofed humans onto the planet. There's absolutely no evidence supporting that.
Science has found evidence that the origins of life on this planet probably came from substances that landed here on meteorites and some of it evolved into living organisms.
Like I said, probabilities favor evidence, not belief.
In some circumstances people can be both victim and victimizer. For instance, who are the victims and victimizers of phobias?
