Jewish Man Arrested For Bringing Dog To Anti-Israel Al-Quds Rally
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
True to a point. We all do assume at one point or another. Some times right - sometime wrong.
EAO- Everything i stated happened at the last Al-Quds day at the Legislature grounds in Ontario. So put up a point.
Bullsh!t.
Dogs are not considered weapons in the criminal code. The dog has to act as a weapon, or be used as a weapon, prior to a charge of aggravated assault or assault with a weapon, can be laid.
The only thing listed as a weapon specifically in the CCoC, is a firearm.
“weapon”« arme »
“weapon” means any thing used, designed to be used or intended for use
- (a) in causing death or injury to any person, or
- (b) for the purpose of threatening or intimidating any person
CanLII - Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46
By your ridiculous definition, carrying a broom is an automatic indictable offense.
Yup if you bring a broom to a protest....where no sweeping is happening.
What do you think they mean by ANY THING?
Just firearms?
"Weapon means any thing used, designed to be used or intended for use (a) in causing death or injury to any person, or (b) for the purpose of threatening or intimidating any person and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, includes a firearm."
I won't call you a Bull****ter, just blind.
Last edited:
What utter bullsh!t.
A broom would have to be used in a menacing way, or a threat made, or an actual assault made for it to be considered a weapon.
Your logic is absurd.
LOL, that would make you a blind bullsh!tter.
What other purpose does one bring a broom to a protest for? Sweeping up afterwards?
For example, in R v James, Judge Porter of the Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador wrote:
"Edward Richard James is charged with having assaulted all five fisheries officers with a weapon, to wit, a motor vessel. These offences are alleged to have been committed when he is alleged to have deliberately struck the two FRC with his own motor vessel. Fisheries officer Miller said that Edward Richard James came in, stern on, towards the Harbour Breton FRC and rammed it so hard that the officer had a concern that the rubber pontoon of the FRC might be cut. Fisheries officer Walsh also described Edward Richard James as having rammed the Harbour Breton FRC, and then having rammed into the port side of the Marystown FRC....
"A weapon can be anything put to the purpose of threatening or intimidating a person. Examples of things being found to be a weapon include, but are not limited to: a knife, a dog, a beer bottle and a car."
"A weapon can be anything put to the purpose of threatening or intimidating a person. Examples of things being found to be a weapon include, but are not limited to: a knife, a dog, a beer bottle and a car."
Picket signs.
If your logic wasn't absurd, picketers would all be criminals.
I love it when you prove me right...
Pickets can be weapons too. That's why the legal definition YOU posted says "ANY THING used.."Picket signs.
If your logic wasn't absurd, picketers would all be criminals.
Is that Newfoundland Judge a blind bull****ter for saying a dog IS a weapon?
a 165lb dog isn't at all intimidating is it?
Here, highlighted the portion, that is exactly what I said.
Again, thanks for proving me right.
A trip through la la land....
I just happened to be walking my 165lb dog when a protest broke out and I just happened to get in an argument. Nobody found my dog inmidating at all. Not even the cops, they didn't even bother to arrest me.
I just happened to be walking my 165lb dog when a protest broke out and I just happened to get in an argument. Nobody found my dog inmidating at all. Not even the cops, they didn't even bother to arrest me.
If we ignored the one kernel of truth in your posts, and adhered to the absurdity?
Sure.
The kernel of truth that a guy intenionally took a 165lb dog to protest where he got into an altercation? Do you think they would have taken away his broom during an altercation at a protest in a public park?
Why did he bring the 165lb dog in the first place?
Why did he bring the 165lb dog in the first place?
Because of the following
The Al Quds rally as demonstrated last year was a hate fest
That Muslims have a strong dislike for dogs as they consider them unclean
Next- the police did what they should have done - if it was a White pride they would separate the 2 groups.
I support his action- Next year 1000 dogs on leashes.
He was demonstrating peacefully
That is my opinion.
Irrelevant, he never...
Any claims that he did, are 100% pure conjecture.
In other words, bullsh!t.
