I think that Racknine would win, in court.You don't think he will settle?
Or you think that RackNine wants it to go to court?
Win or lose though, I'd really like it go the distance, just so I can read the legal arguments presented.
I think that Racknine would win, in court.You don't think he will settle?
Or you think that RackNine wants it to go to court?
I think that Racknine would win, in court.
Win or lose though, I'd really like it go the distance, just so I can read the legal arguments presented.
I concur, that should prove entertaining for sure.I'm also eagerly waiting the Zimmerman ruling.
Not necessarily.
Both defamation and lander can be actionable, even without financial impact to your business.
In this case, the impact of the publicity and context of the accusations, were broad enough and egregious enough, respectively, to constitute defamation and slander.
Oh absolutely.According to the article, the company specified special damages for loss of income of $2.5MM, for this component, they will have to provide some form of justification.
Maybe, I understand the concept of even bad press is good press.Ironically, in the end, one could realistically make the argument that all of this press will have a significant benefit to Racknine and their future revenues
Maybe, I understand the concept of even bad press is good press.
Ya that was the term I was groping for. lol.I recall the phrase as: "There's no such thing as bad press"