How much money does the US give to Pakistan in military aid every year? Pakistan is a far larger menace then Palestine.
"those words used in that manner"
Since the topic was not sexual orientation what why do people think that term meant a sexual thing? (in that instance, it is certainly a dual-purpose' word)
Perhaps some alternative suggestions for a term that references 'those that add moral support top any war where civilians are the prime target and cheers from a 'select group' that would be the biggest 'complainers' within ear range, non-stop also, did I mention that enough times for the picture to be clear as to who I was talking too. If some people have a conscience it is there not by my hand.
As far as twisting (explaining) things to my advantage (Wiesel Words) how did I do on a scale of 1-10?
Is that the Pakistan they created or is this the 'good Pakistan'? (as some would put it)How much money does the US give to Pakistan in military aid every year? Pakistan is a far larger menace then Palestine.
You were in Bora Bora ?
OPPS Osama Bin Laden Is Dead Along Time Ago OPPS - YouTube
Is that the Pakistan they created or is this the 'good Pakistan'? (as some would put it)
Thank you!
There you go, DEFENDING Hamas again.Granted the zealots aren't as corrupt as the Israeli/American puppet...
Removed about 18 posts that consisted of personal attacks towards other members. I would also like to mention that calling other members a "fag" or "faggot" will NOT be tolerated. If I see those words used in that manner in the future, I will issue Infractions at the very least.
Not only are they a personal attack, it's a form of bullying and attempted censorship.I notice that not a single one of my posts were removed, from what I can remember. Yet eao accused me of attacking him personally right from the get go. This is typical of eao, he accuses someone and then goes whining to you guys about it. I, for one, am getting pretty damn tired of the bullshyte. As far as I am concerned, his accusations stand as a personal attack against me.
Not only are they a personal attack, it's a form of bullying and attempted censorship.
The posts that were removed were Mhz', for the record.
There were other posts other than EAO's.Reading the thread left me with that impression by the time I got to where I saw only posts that were hypocritical
Your attempted weaponization of the words fag and faggot, were enough for us to observe that you are a bigot. There was no need to remove all doubt.I suppose referencing somebody with a preference to pastel colors and music more in line with flutes and harps and flowers over guns as being a (insert suitable flower species here).
No, it failed because it was lame and exposed you for the bigot you are.If it was a personal attack it failed as a mod set things right.
I have no doubt that you actually believe that. But given all the nuttery you also hold as fact, and your expressed limited cognitive and comprehension skills, coupled with severely impeded percveption skills, it really is moot.That word is not in the same league as my pet term for you Bear. Shirley denotes that at heart you are a Shirley Temple in a man's world.
Ummm, I wasn't offended. I just laughed at you. I have no idea how the Mods got involved. Not that you explained anything way back, but yes, I agree your use of the words fag and faggot are very immature.Thay is referencing immaturity but you take it as a sexual thing, not my problem and that was explained way vback when it first appeared.
As in all cases involving your opinion, not, would be correct.That term came from a 9/11 topic where your real-life experience in welding should have told you the NIST report was not entirely accurate, IMHO (correct or not)
Is that what your issue was last night?Whine and milk don't mix and even if they did it would be a bitter mix.
No doubt.I have any number of faults spreading bull**** is one of them.
He was right, the post below puts him as being a supporter that you, and the world, deem is a terrorist organization so you cannot help but imply he is a terrorist himself. FYO Hamas was elected you your label is a false one, doesn't matter who says they are as they are hardly impartial observers, they just have sympathisers like your trolling the threads, even your first post was about a poster rather than the topic of the OP being the whole of your reply. When did you get to decide who gets to reply and what they say?.I notice that not a single one of my posts were removed, from what I can remember. Yet eao accused me of attacking him personally right from the get go. This is typical of eao, he accuses someone and then goes whining to you guys about it. I, for one, am getting pretty damn tired of the bullshyte. As far as I am concerned, his accusations stand as a personal attack against me.
I see what you're pissed off about. The money doesn't go to your hero's in hamas to replenish their arsenal.
no surprise that a thread about the states releasing 192 million to Palestine STILL garners a few anti Israel and anti u.s.a. posts.
Can you point out where anyone has said EAO is a terrorist?He was right, the post below puts him as being a supporter that you, and the world, deem is a terrorist organization so you cannot help but imply he is a terrorist himself.
Not even AI could turn a blind eye to the violence and murder Hamas used in their election campaign.FYO Hamas was elected you your label is a false one...
When did you get to decide who gets to reply and what they say?When did you get to decide who gets to reply and what they say?.
Because I love replying to your nonsense.Not sure why you replied Bear...
Yes I can see that.... you are on ignore...
Nope, and don't care. Your nonsensical posts are so much fun to make fun of.Don't you recall that stipulation?