Tennessee enacts evolution, climate change law

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83



Tennessee enacts evolution, climate change law

Tennessee enacted a law Tuesday that critics contend allows public school teachers to challenge climate change and evolution in their classrooms without fear of sanction.

Republican Gov. Bill Haslam allowed the controversial measure to become law without his signature and, in a statement, expressed misgivings about it. Nevertheless, he ignored pleas from educators, parents and civil libertarians to veto the bill.

The law does not require the teaching of alternatives to scientific theories of evolution, climate change and "the chemical origins of life." Instead, it aims to prevent school administrators from reining in teachers who expound on alternative hypotheses to those topics.

The measure's primary sponsor, Republican state Sen. Bo Watson, said it was meant to give teachers the clarity and security to discuss alternative ideas to evolution and climate change that students may have picked up at home and want to explore in class.

"I am glad that the governor recognized that this bill does not do all of the things that its critics have alleged," Watson said Tuesday. "It does not change the state's science curriculum and it does not change how science is taught. Both of those assertions are red herrings."

The bill's critics, which include the Tennessee Science Teachers Assn. and the state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, counter that teachers currently have no problem addressing unconventional ideas and challenges that students bring up. They argue, instead, that the measure gives legal cover to teachers to introduce pseudoscientific ideas.

In a statement to the Tennessean newspaper, Haslam said the measure would create confusion over the state's science standards.

"The bill received strong bipartisan support, passing the House and Senate by a 3-to-1 margin," he said. "But good legislation should bring clarity and not confusion. My concern is that this bill has not met this objective."

The law is likely to stoke growing concerns among teachers around the country that teaching climate science is becoming the same kind of classroom and community flash point as evolution. Tennessee is now the second state, after Louisiana, to allow the teaching of alternatives to accepted science on climate change.

"We respect Gov. Haslam for showing leadership in not signing this legislation," said Hedy Weinberg, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee. "But that doesn't change the fact that Tennessee now has a law on the books essentially granting permission for teachers to violate the 1st Amendment by introducing their own personal religious beliefs on the origin of life into the classroom."

Biologists say there is no scientific controversy over evolution, only a political one.

Tennessee enacts evolution, climate change law - latimes.com
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
Tennessee enacted a law Tuesday that critics contend allows public school teachers to challenge climate change and evolution in their classrooms without fear of sanction.

Forgive me for stirring up a nest, but where is the harm in allowing teachers to question things? What would be the point of teaching science if nobody was allowed to question things as they are? Science would never advance. Isn't that the whole point of science? To question and challenge?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Forgive me for stirring up a nest, but where is the harm in allowing teachers to question things? What would be the point of teaching science if nobody was allowed to question things as they are? Science would never advance. Isn't that the whole point of science? To question and challenge?

I think this law is a dog and pony show. Teachers can question and challenge whatever they want about the curriculum with other teachers and administration. They can't change the curriculum unless they have qualifying evidence, but they can always contribute a critical analysis.

The law makes it seem like teachers are being muzzled.

Who knows - maybe in Tennessee, scientists are manipulating and reprimanding teachers en masse.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Free thought. What a great concept.

Free thought was already there and is stated in the article.

I like how you're only a fiscal conservative when it suits your agenda. Please, feed me moar.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Why are critics of the law upset that teachers can question scientific theory?

Because it confuses the situation. Teachers already have the freedom to question scientific theory. They can bring a critical analysis to administration and if they have sufficient evidence to disprove a particular concept, it can effectively change the curriculum.
 

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
This is the legislated "Teach the Controversy", only problem being, there isn't a controversy. A bunch of people making noise is not the same thing as a scientific controversy.
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
What's the harm in this. I'd say make it obligatory that teachers present all positions... the kids are going to run into concepts of 'Intelligent design' as opposed to the 'accidental' Darwinian system in any case.. and AGW is so full of holes and lies.. that you'd be condemning them to becoming robotons.. spouting hysterical nonsense about a non-existent threat. Its emblamatic of the educational system of a tyranny.

Schools should teach children how to reason objectively, how to think and come to conclusions by way a rational intellectual process. They should not proselytyze political agendas like AGW or a Darwinian moral system.. both of which are taught without a historical or philosophical context these days.. as Truths.. when they are far from that.
 
Last edited:

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Geezus, Coldstream, the pope is a Darwinian and is not a climate-change denier! Get with the dogma!


Actually, the Pope and the Catholic Church is a proponent of Intelligent design which does not exclude Darwinian evolution.
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
The Pope is not a Darwinian :roll:.. and has never supported pagan based AGW nonsense.. or some of the other wild scientific speculation emanating from modern Cosmology these days.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,320
14,504
113
Low Earth Orbit
The Pope is not a Darwinian :roll:.. and has never supported pagan based AGW nonsense.. or some of the other wild scientific speculation emanating from modern Cosmology these days.
THE Pope risked the wrath of the religious Right yesterday by declaring that Darwin's theory of evolution was compatible with Christian faith. In a message to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, which advises the Vatican on scientific matters, the Pope said the theory of natural selection was "more than just a hypothesis".

The Pope, who appears fully recovered from his appendix operation two weeks ago, was responding to requests for clarification from the 80-member Academy, which is holding its 60th anniversary meeting on "Evolution And The Origins Of Life".

Darwin's theories, as formulated in Origin Of Species By Natural Selection and The Descent Of Man led to bitter controversy in the late 19th century, with leading churchmen denouncing them as incompatible with the account given in Genesis.

Pope Pius XII broached the subject in 1950 in his encyclical Humani Generis, indicating that the Church should not reject Darwin's "serious hypothesis" out of hand. But he said that it could be misused by Communist "dialectical materialists" whose aim was "to remove any notion of God from people's minds".

Pope John Paul II went further than Pius XII yesterday, saying: "It is noteworthy that the theory of evolution has progressively taken root in the minds of researchers following a series of discoveries in different
disciplines."

He added: "The convergence, neither sought nor provoked, of results of studies undertaken independently from each other in itself constitutes a significant argument in favour of the theory [of evolution]."

The Pope appeared to side step the vexed theological question of whether, if the theory of evolution from apes and Australopithecus afarensis through Neanderthal man to Homo sapiens is correct, creatures before modern man had souls.

But he said that, whatever man's origins, his soul was a divine creation, declaring: "If the human body has its origin in pre-existing living matter, the spiritual soul is immediately created by God." No theory was acceptable which held that the spirit emerged from "the forces of living material".

Marghareta Hack, a leading Italian astronomer, said the pronouncement was an important step "because for the first time the Church is accepting evolution as a proven fact".

Francesco Barone, a scientific philosopher, told Il Messaggero that, after Galileo's rehabilitation, acceptance of evolutionary theory was the latest in a series of steps which were "mending the tears" in the Church's relationship with science.

Opposition to Darwinism remains staunch in the American Bible Belt.


Contributed by Jeremy C. Ahouse; Biology Department; Brandeis University; Waltham, MA 02254-9110