Death knell for AGW

[Tonington]

Ahhhh it's about cash when it's..

When 9 out of 10 Doctors tell you to buy a product from a company that is only distinguished by the package, you're damned right it's about cash.

Durp.

If you want to open up a can of worms and compare think tank scientists and "experts" who shill for products, to scientists who have to justify their grant proposals, then be my guest.

 

[petros]

How is GE doing with their exclusive deal?

Durpa durp durp durp all the way to the ****ing offshore bank.

 

[Tonington]

How is GE doing with their exclusive deal?

Which one? They have many exclusive deals.

 

[petros]

Why aren't you on top of this ****?

 

[L Gilbert]

In some decades from now we'll look back and say "Climate change? What a con job that was. Got a light?"

Yeah. We all know the climate never changes.

Yeah, after accepting large amounts of cash from industry that wanted to protect their large profits. Gee who does that sound like...

Oh, and for those poo-pooing consensus, let me know how that works out for you if you ever require a surgeon or other medical specialist.

lol Yep. The consensus says water is wet. Must be wrong alright.

Funny thing abour deniers who demand evidence; they rarely provide any of their own. So all they have left is to nitpick and make silly little quips.

Why aren't you on top of this ****?

lmao. Funny you should be the one mentioning being on top of shyte.

 

[petros]

9 out of 10 scientists recommend GE kick backs.

 

[L Gilbert]

Speaking of silly quips ......
That's what happens when gov'ts cut back on university research funding and big companies increase their purchase of science. Kind of a vicious circle; cut funding for more objective research and hand the research over to decidedly biased sources. Did I hear anyone claim that scientists are above accepting bribes/ Nope. Does this have any effect on evidence and fact? Nope

 

[petros]

Now you blame Universities for needing cash from Corporate entites to do research? If Corporations are funding the climate research why would you trust them?

 

[L Gilbert]

Now you blame Universities for needing cash from Corporate entites to do research? If Corporations are funding the climate research why would you trust them?

Is that what I am doing? Tell me more.
I don't trust any research without peer reviews and other methods of screening. I sure as hell don't leap on a denial bandwagon just because I don't like some research.

 

[petros]

I don't trust any research without peer reviews and other methods of
screening.

Who is peer reviewing climate change data and hypotheses?

 

[L Gilbert]

Why ask me? Do I look like Google?

 

[EagleSmack]

Yeah. We all know the climate never changes.

.

Au contraire... the climate has always changed. Guess what... no amount of money changing hands is going to stop it from changing.

 

[petros]

Why ask me? Do I look like Google?

Why aren't you on top of this ****? If your going to put forth a notion that it's a man made nightmare you best have your bases covered Les. You just follow the dog and pony show all willy nilly and believe it to be true?

 

[L Gilbert]

Au contraire... the climate has always changed. Guess what... no amount of money changing hands is going to stop it from changing.

Didn't see my sarcasm in that post? Wanna borrow my cheaters?
Here:

So who said money would change anything? Not me.

Why aren't you on top of this ****? If your going to put forth a notion that it's a man made nightmare you best have your bases covered Les. You just follow the dog and pony show all willy nilly and believe it to be true?

Maybe you need to borrow my cheaters, too. Here ya go:

Couple posts back I said, "I don't trust any research without peer reviews and other methods of screening. I sure as hell don't leap on a denial bandwagon just because I don't like some research."I don't trust any research without peer reviews and other methods of screening. I sure as hell don't leap on a denial bandwagon just because I don't like some research.

 

[petros]

So who said money would change anything? Not me.

Who was the fella that said money fixed your local smelter issues even though they just swept everything under the rug?

Here:

So who said money would change anything? Not me.

Maybe you need to borrow my cheaters, too. Here ya go:

Couple posts back I said, "I don't trust any research without peer reviews and other methods of screening. I sure as hell don't leap on a denial bandwagon just because I don't like some research."I don't trust any research without peer reviews and other methods of screening. I sure as hell don't leap on a denial bandwagon just because I don't like some research.

Do you repeat yourself when under stress?

Who is reviewing IPCC "climate scientist's" data and hypotheses?

 

[EagleSmack]

Didn't see my sarcasm in that post?


.

I saw a response and an emoticon.

At any rate...

The climate will change as it has always done. Stealing from Peter to pay Paul will do no good.

 

[L Gilbert]

Who was the fella that said money fixed your local smelter issues even though they just swept everything under the rug?

Idiot. I didn't say that. I said they used money to clean up their act. And Teck Com didn't sweep anything, they contain their pollution.
Go back to the top of your shytepile or learn to understand English.

 

[petros]

The climate will change as it has always done. Stealing from Peter to pay Paul will do no good.

Not to mention it really pisses Peter off.

Idiot. I didn't say that. I said they used money to clean up their act. And Teck Com didn't sweep anything, they contain their pollution.
Go back to the top of your shytepile or learn to understand English.

Contained pollution is what? Pollution?

 

[L Gilbert]

Do you repeat yourself when under stress?

Only when the clueless didn't understand it in the first place.

[quoteWho is reviewing IPCC "climate scientist's" data and hypotheses?[/QUOTE]I don't know. look it up. Who peer reviews any scientists? You want to know, look it up.

 

[petros]

Why don't you know who is peer reviewing the data and hypotheses that you insist is true and accurate? If you're going to repeat it you damn well better know.