Thoughts of God Make Us Slackers, Study Suggests

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
72
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Like I said, the use of the words "think", "could" and "seems" do not make for a definitive conclusion of any kind.
Of course not, but why would you assume that words like that are the most important aspects rather than the actual evidence leading to the tentative conclusions?
What you seem to propose is that people should reach a conclusion and then find evidence to back it up rather than assessing the evidence to find the conclusion.

I just love studies that start out with a predetermined outcome.
Evidence suggest things. A tentaive result is not a conclusion either BTW. The paper does say tthe evidence suggests something rathet than just proclaiming a definitive conclusion. Did you read the paper to see what the evidence was?
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Ah. Now I understand why you seem to hate this study. Since it did not have a predetermined outcome.


The study authors stated what they expected the study to show. In other words they did NOT go in with an open mind but instead already had determined what the results would be. To me, this suggest the possibility of slanting the study towards a predetermined result.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
72
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
The study authors stated what they expected the study to show. In other words they did NOT go in with an open mind but instead already had determined what the results would be. To me, this suggest the possibility of slanting the study towards a predetermined result.
Expectation is not necessarily causal to bias. I can expect a glass of water to be wet, too. Is that a biased expectation?
If I do a simple experiment on the effect of gravity and friction on a ball bearing and place the ball bearing on an inclined plane, would it be a biased expectation that the ball roll down the slope?
 

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
The study authors stated what they expected the study to show. In other words they did NOT go in with an open mind but instead already had determined what the results would be. To me, this suggest the possibility of slanting the study towards a predetermined result.

If I acknowledge that caffeine could cause liver damage, which is why I do a certain study, that is not presupposing that it does. All studies are done because a possibility of an effect exists. The authors state what may happen and then propose an experiment designed to negate said hypothesis, that is how science works.

For your particular argument, you are basically going in the direction of saying that "A double blind experiment is superior to a direct trial," but you need to keep in mind that observer bias, while a distinct possibility, isn't necessarily a given.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Evidence suggest things. A tentaive result is not a conclusion either BTW. The paper does say tthe evidence suggests something rathet than just proclaiming a definitive conclusion. Did you read the paper to see what the evidence was?


If all the paper is, is a "suggestion", then it is not worth the paper it was written on and in fact was a complete waste of money. It, in fact, isn't proof of anything. The OP title of "Thoughts of God make us slackers" is very definitive in it's statement.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
72
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
If all the paper is, is a "suggestion", then it is not worth the paper it was written on and in fact was a complete waste of money. It, in fact, isn't proof of anything. The OP title of "Thoughts of God make us slackers" is very definitive in it's statement.
:rolleyes: Then the suggestion that once said that the planet revolved in orbit around the sun was worthless as well.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
:rolleyes: Then the suggestion that once said that the planet revolved in orbit around the sun was worthless as well.


If the "suggestion" that there is a God is worthless, why would any other "suggestion" not be also?
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I wouldn't actually call the suggestion about gods existences as worthless. I think faith actually helps some people.
But if you are thinking that I adopt an either/or, all-or-nothing POV, you'll be disappointed.



I'n not suggesting you adopt anything. You already have the all or nothing POV when it comes to the existence of God.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
The study authors stated what they expected the study to show.
That's standard procedure in statistical studies, backed up by well understood sampling theory and tests of statistical significance. In this case, for instance, they start out with the expectation that there's a positive relationship between thoughts of god and being a slacker. Then they form what's called the null hypothesis, that there is no relationship. Then they choose their sample, gather and analyze the data, and ask themselves the question, what is the probability that we'd see these results in a sample this size if the null hypothesis is in fact correct? If that analysis passes the tests of statistical significance, the null hypothesis is rejected, and the results are deemed to support the original expectation. The study wouldn't have been written in precisely those terms, most such studies don't explicitly talk about the null hypothesis because the target audience understands how it's done, but if they did it correctly that's certainly how they proceeded.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,142
8,151
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca


YMCA
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Perhaps somebody should do a study on the ones who study/think about people who study/think about God and see how productive their lives really are. Just sayin ....
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I like this disclaimer

Discussion of the beliefs of scientists is based on a survey of members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), which partnered with the Pew Research Center on the survey. AAAS is the world's largest general scientific society and includes members representing all scientific fields. However, the survey of AAAS members may not be representative of all scientists in the U.S.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
"In the new study, the researchers primed more than 350 engineering students with the idea of God or faith, for example, by having participants write a sentence using a list of words with spiritual connotations. Students then completed skill tests in which they had to make as many words as possible from a group of letters. When prompted with religious imagery or language beforehand, the students came up with fewer words, regardless of their religious background, than those who hadn't been primed with such imagery.
The researchers think the lack of effort in the "religious-primed" group could be dictated by a belief that fate is in God's hands"

There are a couple things that I find interesting about this study.

One, is that it would appear that the "slackers" (is it slacking to not be able to solve a puzzle? Really?), were the only ones primed along a specific track before the word challenge began. I know perhaps being a spiritual person makes me a bit dense about these things according to the findings, but, am I the only person in the world whose brain tends to stick to a track and look for certain themes? I would suspect if someone made me sit and write out sentences about colours prior to a test like this, I'd end up stuck for words once the skills section began because my brain was busy looking for words that related to colours.

The second is that humanity has evolved, has it not? And we've evolved, very strongly, with a sense of spirituality. If it were a cause of slacking, I suspect we'd be able to see evidence of that in the overall hierarchy of personal success. But, I don't see atheists or theists landing at the bottom of the cultural pile.

I suspect her research findings as they pertain to slacking have much more to do with the habit of our brains to get stuck on one track thinking, than they do with thoughts of god turning us into slackers.