Neither of you jackasses know the first thing about economy.
A prime example is you wanting a manufacturing industry that doesn't use resources.
A prime example is you wanting a manufacturing industry that doesn't use resources.
When you're sitting on the lion's share of resources which produce a higher return for less input than manufacturing then manufacturing falls second.:lol:
You're the one advocating a resource industry without a manufacturing arm. I actually suggested a balanced system. If you're exporting raw materials too quickly (ie. through a pipeline), you'll risk a dutch disease effect.
You sense a hissy fit? You still haven't ended your last one.Who? Are you talking out your ass again? I sense another hissy fit coming on. Have a cold glass of water Petros, and count backwards from 30.
You sense a hissy fit?
My question turned around? Really?
Christmas staff lay offs are a real bummer. Spring Ag hiring in this quarter will turn that around.
There are 3 support jobs for every one job in ag.
And see this is a nonsense question. If you're surveying me, then you are the one who will be using the data to make an estimate. Second, the questionnaire determines if you are employed, or if you are not employed. It doesn't ask if you're hiring...Further, the survey doesn't report employment and unemployment months in advance...go back and read the documentation, and look for the term "reference week".If I survey you in January to ask if you're hiring in May would you be able to make an accurate guesstimate which is what the LFR is based on?
It doesn't bother me one bit that economics aren't your forte.
Full of crap? You, our inhouse global warming goof doesn't even know the difference between albedo and thermal reflection what makes you think you have me beat on economics?
Albedo is reflection not absorbtion.
Now it's energy and not solar radiation? **** you're a moron.
You don't even know the ****ing basics?