You sure have a knack for coming up with effective and creative solutions.
Yep, Bear has (the annoying to some) habit of succinctly zeroing in on the point! :lol:
You sure have a knack for coming up with effective and creative solutions.
But it's still a completely separate issue from the idea that the initial funding is a handout.
My question is not founded on whether they should receive any monies, but rather, are those monies being expended to the best advantage of the community.
I see 2 separate transactions in this example. The first being a deal that they had negotiated in the past and the second being the 'emergency funds' to accommodate this specific situation. In either case, the big questions on my mind is: is the funding level appropriate and does the specific use of funds seek to maximize the value to the community.
Everything beyond that is fluff or positions in a blame game
I think, for the most part, that we are looking at it in relatively the same way.
My initial comment was directed towards those who would say "Oh look, we're giving them more money". The erroneous issue being, of course, that we are giving them money in the first place. It's not a gift, it's a payment.
Any funding, from any source, for any reason, should come with accountability. That's a no brainer. I don't care what community or group of people you are talking about.
As far as it being two separate transactions, yes and no. It would be difficult to refute that they are inextricably linked to each other. Have the original funds been used in an appropriate manner? My guess would be not, as I find it difficult to believe that an entire community would be in such dire straights had the funds been used to the betterment of the entire community. Well, not the entire community because it seems that those on the leadership payroll are doing quite well. That's a bright red flag for one. But these situations do not spring forth overnight either, so it's not like you can simply look at the current leadership and point the finger there. Nor should they be the only ones to be held accountable, anything that involves the federal government is bound to be a bureaucratic nightmare, so I don't see treaty fund payments being any different.
And while I don't follow every single article on the topic, what I am seeing just looks like political back and forth between the feds and the chief and AFN. It's all about scoring political headlines. To me, this is not the time to be dickering back and forth, get these people into decent accommodations and do it yesterday. Then deal with issues of accountability, but make sure that they are dealt with.
Says here Chief Spence lives on the reserve, good. I heard a question of whether she did, now it's answered.
Where does Chief Spence live in Attawapiskat? There are no mansions in Attawapiskat - NetNewsledger.com
I saw a story on CBC TV doing a story on a reserve on Vancouver Island that had similar problems with squalid housing, and the reporter was talking to the chief. The chief responded that he did not live on the reserve in the squalid housing. I never saw any followup on this. This was one case. But it makes many people wonder, where do the chiefs live? This is the kind of information people should know.
Says here Chief Spence lives on the reserve, good. I heard a question of whether she did, now it's answered.
Where does Chief Spence live in Attawapiskat? There are no mansions in Attawapiskat - NetNewsledger.com
I saw a story on CBC TV doing a story on a reserve on Vancouver Island that had similar problems with squalid housing, and the reporter was talking to the chief. The chief responded that he did not live on the reserve in the squalid housing. I never saw any followup on this. This was one case. But it makes many people wonder, where do the chiefs live? This is the kind of information people should know.
With people living in squalid conditions there will be much more scrutiny of how hundreds of millions of dollars go to waste. Questions will come up that will require answers. Aboriginal band councils don't like scrutiny of how they conduct their affairs with taxpayer money. They will be getting more.
All those modular homes are in Moosonee waiting to move on soon-to-be-gone ice roads. Reason: No site preparation and a great debate about who wouldn't cut the cheque....
All those modular homes are in Moosonee waiting to move on soon-to-be-gone ice roads. Reason: No site preparation and a great debate about who wouldn't cut the cheque....
Yea, this one's starting to fire up again, lol
One of the sides has to give up their worries about money and just get moving.
I find that a little disturbing! Although I am open minded enough to realize that frozen ground could impede site excavation and installation of services. Is someone "trying to pull teeth through the A$$hole"?
I'm not so sure about that. If money was given proper consideration and plans made and adhered to I would think it would be a "fait accompli" at lowest cost.
I don't share your optimism. In five or ten years conditions will be squalid again like always. I would be like that as well if I had to live
in an area where there were no jobs or any bloody hope of there ever being any.
What I find most objectionable is people are being used as pawns in a power struggle between Chief (and friends) and Government
It's a lot of miles to anything hard around the west side of James Bay....Why? I thought the Canadian Shield was a vast "treasure chest" full of resources. It is situated on a major river and close to the ocean. With a lot of home based businesses these days, location isn't quite the criteria it used to be.
The spokesperson I saw on the news last night (with the tattoo on her face) didn't give me the impression of being a direct descendent of Einstein, either in appearance or discourse.
It's a lot of miles to anything hard around the west side of James Bay....
Same way as you and me's my guess ;-)So how do they manage to procreate? :smile: