Right. So here we have two claims. hers is that climate change is causing an increase in filial cannibalism. Kakato and apparently your claim is that she's full of crap. Neither she nor Kak and you have provided any evidence for either claim. For all you know she may just have evidence to back up her claims. If she does, your claim that she's full of crap is proven wrong. If she doesn't have anything to back up her claim, then your claim may be right. It has nothing to do with proving a negative. Right again. Nope but, her having a lack of evidence doesn't prove that Kak and you are right either.
lol.
If someone tells me a Yeti ate their cat and I say that they are full of crap or that its a load of bull the burden of proof is not mine to prove.
From everything I have read this woman is offering anecdotal information to hedge theory on global warming. Notice I didn't say I think global warming is a bunch of crap. What happened here is that Kakato considers the whole GW debate nothing but bunk and from there it degenerated into "I am smarter than you - No you aren't!" pissing contest. Which really has piss all to do with polar bears at that point.
The argument being made in your last sentence above regarding the bears and the lack of scientific data sounds more like something a conspiracy theorist argument. Want to change my mind? Want me to retract the load of bull statement?
Show me some data that is neither subjective or anecdotal.
About the bears.
Last edited: