He's stating that the pipeline requires enough time to have an environmental review.
Not sure where the waffle is there.
Crepe?
U.S. to re-route Keystone XL due to environmental concerns
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
He's stating that the pipeline requires enough time to have an environmental review.
Not sure where the waffle is there.
Crepe?
Yeah, sure.. Enviro testing... That's what he's doing.
BTW - Heard on the radio this morning that Obama is on the campaign trail.. What a co-inki-dink
BTW - Heard on the radio this morning that Obama is on the campaign trail.. What a co-inki-dink
.. And hence, Harper's announcement that the West Coast pipeline will be considered a priority.
Obama really crapped the bed on this one.
Obama really crapped the bed on this one.
Considering the pipeline won't bring that many jobs to the U.S., it's not really worth it for them.
It looks like it will only be a few hundred permanent jobs on the U.S. side.
Yeah, I suppose that the Americans agreed to allow the line through their nation as a favour to Canada.
The west coast line will already be under way.. To me it doesn't matter when it starts to Texas, the competition for the resource will have already been firmly established.
If President Obama veto's the oil pipeline, which he cannot do without killing the Social Security tax cuts as well, he can kiss his second term goodbye. Stop all this whining about the pipeline, it will pass sooner or later.
H.R. 4890, the Legislative Line-Item Veto Act, was approved by the House Budget Committee on June 14, 2006 by a vote of 24-9. It was approved in the full House on June 22. A similar version was included in the "Stop Over Spending Act of 2006," authored by Senator Judd Gregg, in the Senate and approved by the Senate Budget Committee, but the full Senate failed to approve it, thereby preventing the Legislative Line-Item Veto Act from becoming law.
We have no line item veto.
H.R. 4890, the Legislative Line-Item Veto Act, was approved by the House Budget Committee on June 14, 2006 by a vote of 24-9. It was approved in the full House on June 22. A similar version was included in the "Stop Over Spending Act of 2006," authored by Senator Judd Gregg, in the Senate and approved by the Senate Budget Committee, but the full Senate failed to approve it, thereby preventing the Legislative Line-Item Veto Act from becoming law.
We have no line item veto.
Right now, I would prefer that the Democrats run another person against Obama, if not it just might be Ron Paul's time.