Yeah, it's just part of the feeling of entitlement that some folks under 50 think is their perfect right, known as "Screw you Jack, I'm alright".
The only people I know who say that are retired people with cushy public servant pensions.
Yeah, it's just part of the feeling of entitlement that some folks under 50 think is their perfect right, known as "Screw you Jack, I'm alright".
Also the "20 Somethings" that just got out of college with their degree in Communications saying...
"Screw that... I'm not getting dirty...I'm a college graduate."
The only people I know who say that are retired people with cushy public servant pensions.
The only people I know who say that are retired people with cushy public servant pensions.
So does Naomi Klein, but that doesn't stop her from making some excellent points.
And they are?
And they are?
ACORN Playing Behind Scenes Role in 'Occupy' Movement
Those bonus do not come out of company profits from dining business. They bailouts come from taxpayers via a Government sanctioned 'gift' because the 'administrators' failed at running a business that was profitable and that means the stock-holders should see their stocks tumble in price and how happy would they be about that?
The banks and companies are not responsible for paying back that money, the taxpayers who are not stockholders or employees are the ones footing the bills so how can you claim that the various companies earned it when banker fraud saw some in Iceland being sent to jail for the same sort of activity.
Also, why are US taxpayers no supporting bailouts in Europe with the same deal, they pay the debt their Gov create via bailout funds, this isn't chimp change were're talking about.
[/FONT][/FONT]
Are you attempting to be deceitful or are you just not on the ball. The 1% in question is for the US only and the stats for them are 1.5% earn over $250,000. Why use the wages of the biggest and poorest nation (China and India for example) to try and show the OWS crowd is 'against anyone making more than $75,000If you have an income of $75,000, you are in the top 1% of people in the world.
Are you attempting to be deceitful or are you just not on the ball.
Oh, forgive me, please allow me to clarify.
A salary of $75,000 puts you in the top 1% in the world. This whining about the 1% in the US simply shows how myopic most of these protestors are; they would be among the very well off elsewhere, even with the tents in a park.
Well fed, well coddled, with all the toys imaginable, they still act like they're oppressed.
Is that better?
Oh, forgive me, please allow me to clarify.
A salary of $75,000 puts you in the top 1% in the world. This whining about the 1% in the US simply shows how myopic most of these protestors are; they would be among the very well off elsewhere, even with the tents in a park.
Well fed, well coddled, with all the toys imaginable, they still act like they're oppressed.
Is that better?
I think you are "selling them a little short", I think they are just frustrated and don't really know why.
Of course anyone who owns a home, has a job, a vehicle, and is able to cover all their bills without going into is indeed very fortunate.