It has nothing to do with freedom. It is however inequality, and has nothing to do with Baird's speech.
He did talk about an office of religious freedom. If it applies to other countries, it should aply to Canada too. No double standards.
It has nothing to do with freedom. It is however inequality, and has nothing to do with Baird's speech.
Much to your amazement I'm sure, we have religious freedom in Canada.He did talk about an office of religious freedom. If it applies to other countries, it should aply to Canada too. No double standards.
He did talk about an office of religious freedom. If it applies to other countries, it should aply to Canada too. No double standards.
Religious freedom is not the problem you have. It is the Separate School Boards. These rights are approx 148 years old or so.
Much to your amazement I'm sure, we have religious freedom in Canada.
After 148 years, you'd think it's time to update it.
Isn't that unconstitutional?
No, the constitution is changeable as long as the federal government and so many provinces vote on to it.
Not true.But not a freedom that is equally beneficial.
Who says?One religious group has a right to religious education covered by taxes, the others don't.
Not true.
Who says?
Not true. It's tax deductible.The british North America Act. A parent can send his child to a Catholic school in Ontario without having to pay more than taxes. That would not be the case to a Jewish school, whereby he'd have to pay out of pocket on top of taxes.
No, the constitution is changeable as long as the federal government and so many provinces vote on to it.
Not true. It's tax deductible.
Besides that, any Chartered school, receives funding from Provincial coffers, per student, as mandated by the Ontario education act.
It's the law.Thanks for posting that fact. Perhaps Machjo will start to believe this reality now that it has come from a few different posters.
It doesn't help that when they read news about the issue, they don't/can't recognize the difference between the meaning "school funding" and "student funding".That tiny, insignificant little detail seems to be lost on some folks
It doesn't help that when they read news about the issue, they don't/can't recognize the difference between the meaning "school funding" and "student funding".
Any student attending a Chartered school in Ontario, is funded by the public coffers. It's the LAW, Full stop.
The school itself, is not funded. Any fees paid by parents, go to funding the school. So long as the school is a recognized and chartered school.
Likely because they withhold funding that would go for infrastructure. In Ontario, there is zero funding for private schools too.The experience here in AB seems to be about the same although I think that private schools may not get 100% per student funding. For some reason, I believe that I read that AB private schools receive around 80% of the per student allotment, the balance is (obviously) recaptured from tuition fees, etc.