Yes you did, and you're still wrong, as you are about most things scientific, for reasons that were explained to you at the time. Obviously you didn't understand that documentary you were watching, it certainly wouldn't have made a nonsensical claim like that. Look up this word: unconformity.
As I said before, you stick to the lectures and what they say, while I give a different thing by finding the defects in their postulations.
They have not this possibility in their minds when they postulate about the origin of these mountains: the possibility that such mountains were the portions of some mountains that had broken up in the past.
The idea is that
there is a missing period of some million years between a layer below and a layer above, and such missed period is resembled only by a line: there is no layer resembling this missed period. And they said they are puzzled about this, and none could certainly know the explanation.
If we put in mind that such mountains are the portions of some planet that was destroyed in the past, then this problem will be solved.
1- If we imagine now a planet with a mountain on it, and this mountain was a portion of a planet that was destroyed in the past (before one million years for example) --> so here there is a time difference between this planet and the mountain on it : a million years difference.
2- If this planet is broken up into many pieces, and one of the pieces includes that mountain together with a portion of that planet where that mountain is set: the time differenc is preserved as one million years difference.
3 -If this piece (the mountain+ the portion of the destroyed planet on which that moutain was situated) falls on a new planet--> the result will be two differences in time between the layers and the problem of the missed rocks as they call it, will be solved.
The old mountain
The piece of the destroyed planet on which that mountain was set
The new planet site where tha piece fell.
And the differences in age will be preserved and explained in this way.
If I write this with light not with letters, you will not agree unless a geologist (and in fact all geologists) tell you, while they are unaware of this idea.
Mountains