Wow.. I suppose that this shouldn't be any kind of surprise with the three of you deluding yourselves into believing that this document strengthens your position. Without question, each of you have invested so much personal capital that there is nothing that will prove to you that your position is, well, put simply, wrong.
The Royal Academy report is yet another sign that the sun is setting on the theory of AGW, but what makes this report so important is that it is from a body that the greenie lobby puts much faith in.
It's sad to see Morgan has nothing left but ad hominems like 'youtube' and now 'sidekick'. I guess if you can live with misrepresenting facts and lying to people on a daily basis, the truth eventually kicks you back in the face and you have nothing left but whine and cheese.
It's okay buddy. I'm sure you and petros will get some scraps within the next year or two. In the mean time, be a good boy and research before you preach so that you don't have to suffer the inevitable boot in your behind when the facts come back to haunt you.
Poor little guy, I guess that you are re-thinking the value of providing youtube-science as your smoking gun on this issue.... Perhaps you're feeling extremely foolish in that you were so want to believe, I mean really truly believe in AGW that you were motivated to snap-up even the most ridiculous sources of any info that would support your beliefs.
Good luck to you Chester (?), but have faith, I am certain that there is some more youtube-science that will pass your high scientific standards, peer review, etc... Keep lookking and good luck!