Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

Status
Not open for further replies.

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
It undermines the entire theory that curbing emissions will have any impact on climate fluctuations.

As far as your comment about childish comments is concerned; "physician - heal thyself"... Ask your side-kick buddy if there is a youtube video that will explain it.


It makes a case for curbing emmissions....read it yet?

Again, not sure what "side kick" buddy means.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
No misrepresentation.... You just don't like the reality

The reality they quoted is fine, I have no problem with that. The misrepresentation is the framing of those facts.

I'm not entirely shocked that you would rather read misrepresentation than the actual source material.

You really do love the taste of sand.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
It makes a case for curbing emmissions....read it yet?


It could make a case for not jay-walking for all I care.

Don't be so coy Avro, I can already sense the 2-stepping and radical modofication of your individual position on this issue. The bottom-line: This report flies in the face of the IPCC, East Anglia, etc in that it doesn't hang human activity as "the culprit".


Again, not sure what "side kick" buddy means.

You know... Your side-kick.. Kinda like Spike and Chester from the cartoons...

Maybe this will help

YouTube - Sylvester, Chester, and Spike - Sylvester says WTF
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
It could make a case for not jay-walking for all I care.

Don't be so coy Avro, I can already sense the 2-stepping and radical modofication of your individual position on this issue. The bottom-line: This report flies in the face of the IPCC, East Anglia, etc in that it doesn't hang human activity as "the culprit".




You know... Your side-kick.. Kinda like Spike and Chester from the cartoons...

Maybe this will help

YouTube - Sylvester, Chester, and Spike - Sylvester says WTF

It dosen't fly in the face of IPCC at all....you still haven't read it have you?

Still don't understand the side kick comment and how it is relevant.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
It dosen't fly in the face of IPCC at all....you still haven't read it have you?

Still don't understand the side kick comment and how it is relevant.


Yeah sure, the report actually supports the IPCC and all the denizens of greenie-land.... Whatever helps you sleep at night.

BTW - watch the video and if that doesn't help, ask Petros, he'll help you out on the sidekick thingy
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
The bottom-line: This report flies in the face of the IPCC, East Anglia, etc in that it doesn't hang human activity as "the culprit".

Well, if you would read the report, you would see how wrong you are. There is something to be said for willfull ignorance. Maybe it's you that needs help sleeping at night.

The report, if you would be so intrepid as to actually read, agrees very much with the IPCC:

Climate change science has advanced markedly over the past 20 years, as a result of many factors. These include improved methods for handling long-term climate data sets, the ever-lengthening record of climate observations, improved measurement techniques, including those from satellites, better understanding of the climate system, improved methods for simulating the climate system, and increased computer power.

One indication of these advances is the increasing degree of confidence in the attribution of climate change to human activity, as expressed in the key conclusions of IPCC Working Group 1 (WG1) in its assessments.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
Yeah sure, the report actually supports the IPCC and all the denizens of greenie-land.... Whatever helps you sleep at night.

BTW - watch the video and if that doesn't help, ask Petros, he'll help you out on the sidekick thingy

It does, read it.

No, I think I'll let you explain the revelance of the side kick comment.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,814
467
83
It's sad to see Morgan has nothing left but ad hominems like 'youtube' and now 'sidekick'. I guess if you can live with misrepresenting facts and lying to people on a daily basis, the truth eventually kicks you back in the face and you have nothing left but whine and cheese.

It's okay buddy. I'm sure you and petros will get some scraps within the next year or two. In the mean time, be a good boy and research before you preach so that you don't have to suffer the inevitable boot in your behind when the facts come back to haunt you.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Wow.. I suppose that this shouldn't be any kind of surprise with the three of you deluding yourselves into believing that this document strengthens your position. Without question, each of you have invested so much personal capital that there is nothing that will prove to you that your position is, well, put simply, wrong.

The Royal Academy report is yet another sign that the sun is setting on the theory of AGW, but what makes this report so important is that it is from a body that the greenie lobby puts much faith in.



It's sad to see Morgan has nothing left but ad hominems like 'youtube' and now 'sidekick'. I guess if you can live with misrepresenting facts and lying to people on a daily basis, the truth eventually kicks you back in the face and you have nothing left but whine and cheese.

It's okay buddy. I'm sure you and petros will get some scraps within the next year or two. In the mean time, be a good boy and research before you preach so that you don't have to suffer the inevitable boot in your behind when the facts come back to haunt you.


Poor little guy, I guess that you are re-thinking the value of providing youtube-science as your smoking gun on this issue.... Perhaps you're feeling extremely foolish in that you were so want to believe, I mean really truly believe in AGW that you were motivated to snap-up even the most ridiculous sources of any info that would support your beliefs.


Good luck to you Chester (?), but have faith, I am certain that there is some more youtube-science that will pass your high scientific standards, peer review, etc... Keep lookking and good luck!
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
Captain dosen't even have the decency to clean up his own mess.

How embarressing.:roll:

Perhaps he will retort again and call me some names as it appears that's all he is capable of.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
114,089
13,071
113
Low Earth Orbit
It could make a case for not jay-walking for all I care.

Don't be so coy Avro, I can already sense the 2-stepping and radical modofication of your individual position on this issue. The bottom-line: This report flies in the face of the IPCC, East Anglia, etc in that it doesn't hang human activity as "the culprit".




You know... Your side-kick.. Kinda like Spike and Chester from the cartoons...

Maybe this will help

YouTube - Sylvester, Chester, and Spike - Sylvester says WTF
I'm glad I peed before I saw this.....

Captain dosen't even have the decency to clean up his own mess.

How embarressing.:roll:

Perhaps he will retort again and call me some names as it appears that's all he is capable of.
How exactly does global warming effect you in a personal way outside of financial?
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Dr. Lewis' letter of resignation and a petition signed by over 30 thousand U.S. scientists objecting to the Kyoto Treaty and global warming alarmism.

If we do nothing, we will all be ripped off by those businesses, academics, universities, politicians and individuals that have learned how to exploit the global warming alarmism that inflicts the Left and their supporters in the Democratic Party for their own gain at the expense of taxpayers and consumers.

The fact that global warming has morphed first into climate change (the climate is always changing) and now into Obama's "climate disturbances" or some other meaningless word means that they know the science is bogus but their goal of cap and tax and global wealth redistribution is still on the agenda. It is also a way of channeling large sums to buy votes, from bankers that will make millons, even billions trade carbon credits, to companies like GE who receive subsidies for their non-economic ind turbines. It is corruption on a vast scale and we are all paying for it.


Unless we do something about it, the price will keep increasing. It threatens the country because it further increases our cost of doing business, which will make us even less competitive in world markets and it adds to our burgeoning national debt.


Please read Dr. Lewis' letter. Please do some research at Anthony Watts' science blog Watts Up With That? and please make your voice heard. Between nuclear energy and fossil fuels we can be energy independent. We can create millions of new jobs harvesting our fossil fuels. We can create trillions in new wealth.


Instead of spending billions subsidizing non-economic alternate (wind and solar) energy, adding billions to our mushrooming national debt, we could instead be realizing billions in lease and royalty payments from the production of natural gas, oil and coal to help reduce our national debt.


Hal Lewis: My Resignation From The American Physical Society
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,814
467
83
It's funny how you can get so many people to agree to something when they don't even question why or how to come to that conclusion. I guess all it takes is a physics professor to make off-hand comments without actually referring to any scientific debate to get the ignorant to sign away.

That people would just unquestionably put their name to something like this makes the collective act more like a religion and less like a science. Sensationalism wins again.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,814
467
83
How many really know the answers to these global warming/cooling questions, I sure don't.

Well do some research. Half the problem is making a decision without knowing why. It's the same close-minded mentality that deniers use that keeps them ignorant.

There are scientifically credible studies out there that make a good case for our involvement. And these same studies take the time to also factor in natural climate change. Despite that, they overwhelmingly agree that the most prominent factor of climate change in the last 40 or so years is anthropogenic.

In fact, if you go through this thread or the cooling thread you'll be able to see morgan and co. consistently getting slapped in the face on these issues. And even when the argument transcends the science into politics, they're still unsuccessful in proving any significant malpractice.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
114,089
13,071
113
Low Earth Orbit
If we do nothing, we will all be ripped off by those businesses, academics, universities, politicians and individuals that have learned how to exploit the global warming alarmism that inflicts the Left and their supporters in the Democratic Party for their own gain at the expense of taxpayers and consumers.
Fear sells.


 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Well do some research. Half the problem is making a decision without knowing why. It's the same close-minded mentality that deniers use that keeps them ignorant.

There are scientifically credible studies out there that make a good case for our involvement. And these same studies take the time to also factor in natural climate change. Despite that, they overwhelmingly agree that the most prominent factor of climate change in the last 40 or so years is anthropogenic.

In fact, if you go through this thread or the cooling thread you'll be able to see morgan and co. consistently getting slapped in the face on these issues. And even when the argument transcends the science into politics, they're still unsuccessful in proving any significant malpractice.

No question man is accelerating global warming, the question is can man prevent it? Within 100 years or so we will have climate change, rising seas etc. We (man) are at least 50 years to late, the billions of have nots now want to have, and we won't give up what we have, any change's we may do will not make a difference we will have to adapt to living in a different environment.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
114,089
13,071
113
Low Earth Orbit
No question man is accelerating global warming, the question is can man prevent it? Within 100 years or so we will have climate change, rising seas etc. We (man) are at least 50 years to late, the billions of have nots now want to have, and we won't give up what we have, any change's we may do will not make a difference we will have to adapt to living in a different environment.
Oh **** I forgot we don't adapt and evolve due to environmental change anymore. .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.