To what I believe?
I was pretty clear in what I believe.
I, like Suzuki believe it is a wonderful opportunity for some of us to have a wonderful future.
I think he just wanted your commentary on the junk science that attempts to invalidate AGW.
To what I believe?
I was pretty clear in what I believe.
I, like Suzuki believe it is a wonderful opportunity for some of us to have a wonderful future.
To what I believe?
I was pretty clear in what I believe.
I, like Suzuki believe it is a wonderful opportunity for some of us to have a wonderful future.
They won't answer you Petros.. They can't without sinking their own feeble position.
It still has not been validated by true science if this is being debated as belief and predictions.I think he just wanted your commentary on the junk science that attempts to invalidate AGW.
That's not true.
It's quid pro quo.
Of course the petros dodge belongs here.
Speaking of dodging, you still have yet to answer some basic questions I asked you.
It still has not been validated by true science if this is being debated as belief and predictions.
If Suzuki is spot on about global devistation but way off base on overpopulation then any credibility is negated by the alleged necessity of population reduction.
Or is he right on both accounts?
Repeat.Speaking of dodging, you still have yet to answer some basic questions I asked you.
Avro.
What do you "believe" and what do you "know"?
What are the beliefs of those who gave you any alleged "knowledge"?
:roll:
Why is this such a hard thing for you to respond to?
I told you already. I have no beliefs.
For your sake I hope reading retention isn't a New World requirement.
Does the phrase "if bull**** were golden" help?
What if I don't have a belief?