The "who, what, when, where and why" of American History.

[CDNBear]

How did you take apart the Ruby/Nixon connection.

Posted a single piece of evidence, I took it apart. See what I was saying about hiding from the truth?

If you can prove that Richard Nixon did not know Jack Ruby, you are indeed amazing !

Most people that know me think that, funny it didn't take you long to see the truth there. I must be doing good today.

Did you take this apart as well?

The Men Who Killed Lennon

Everything you posted on it so far.

Which is why you switched to Nixon/Ruby. That got smacked out, now you're back onto this, as if page one of this thread didn't exist.

I predict it will happen again and again.

 

[taxslave]

I still don't see why anyone would worry or even care what a dead crooked president did or did not do. Has no bearing on our lives today. Unless his goast is planning to run for pres in 2012.

 

[commonsense]

I still don't see why anyone would worry or even care what a dead crooked president did or did not do. Has no bearing on our lives today. Unless his goast is planning to run for pres in 2012.

Actually, the people who supported Nixon are indeed working on the next election.

Sarah Palin a bestselling author?


So there you have it, Nixon's apologists are still trying to control the world, so it is all very relevant.

 

[CDNBear]

Hmmm, interesting.

 

[commonsense]

Kind of scary really.

The big plan is to make Jeb Bush the next President of the United States, and if that ever happens, I think that there will be a mass exodus... some people will not be able to stomach another Bush.

Notice how so many people call him "the smart one"?

I'm still scratching my head trying to understand that one.

 

[CDNBear]

Kind of scary really.

I don't think it's scary that you ignored my post (#101). Interestingly funny though.

The big plan is to make Jeb Bush the next President of the United States, and if that ever happens, I think that there will be a mass exodus... some people will not be able to stomach another Bush.

Kind of like if another Trudeau become PM here.

Notice how so many people call him "the smart one"?

No I hadn't noticed.

I'm still scratching my head trying to understand that one.

I bet you do that a lot.

 

[Chiliagon]

American History OBGYN

 

[commonsense]

No, the appropriate parallel is like another Ted Kennedy.

That would make him the third brother to run, you see?

I tend to question your accuracy, you tend to mix apples and oranges, a common fallacy, but nevertheless very irritating to somebody who is very meticulous.


You can compare Trudeau to JFK JR., and I certainly hope that Richard Melon Scaife has not targeted him as well.

 

[CDNBear]

You dance around challenges like a pro, good call. I was getting tired of handing you your ass anyways.

No, the appropriate parallel is like another Ted Kennedy.

Ummm, sure, but please by all means, miss the point.

That would make him the third brother to run, you see?

Ya, if that was the point I was trying to make.

I tend to question your accuracy, you tend to mix apples and oranges, a common fallacy, but nevertheless very irritating to somebody who is very meticulous.

You tend to be full of sh!t.

You can compare Trudeau to JFK JR., and I certainly hope that Richard Melon Scaife has not targeted him as well.

You may think you're meticulous, but we know you aren't a linear thinker.

As the thread goes on and on, it draws closer to the Rothschilds I see.

 

[commonsense]

I am a pro.

You, on the other hand, are not.

 

[CDNBear]

I am a pro at dodging challenges.

fify...and...Ya, that's what I said.

You, on the other hand, are not.

Absolutely true, I'm no pro at dodging the facts, like yourself. I hit them straight on, unlike you.

Now, when you find some facts to counter the huge holes I poked in your theories, come on back. Because right now, you're striking up a tune, you aren't skilled enough to dance to.

 

[commonsense]

The bottom line is this: "If I am a linear thinker, you are a linear stinker."

Clearly, by definition, somebody who explores "who", "what", "where", when", and "why", is anything but a linear thinker.

Now there are two explanations for your tendency to misrepresent -you are either misguided, or you are practicing sophistry -proving your capacity to argue a position whether it is correct or incorrect.

Now stop being a stinker and use your ability to think to advance the cause of truth.



Can you do that, because if you don't stop being foolish, I.m gonna have to kick your ass? -and I'd rather not.

 

[CDNBear]

You get a thumbs up for my first LOL of the day!!! Good work.

The bottom line is this: "If I am a linear thinker, you are a linear stinker."

Which is negated by the fact that you haven't expressed much thought, let alone linear, in this thread, on the three topics you tried to convince us of your point of view.

Clearly, by definition, somebody who explores "who", "what", "where", when", and "why", is anything but a linear thinker.

Not necessarily, case in point, you.

Now there are two explanations for your tendency to misrepresent -you are either misguided, or you are practicing sophistry -proving your capacity to argue a position whether it is correct or incorrect.

Or the fact that everytime you get caught out in the open, unable to refute the material presented that shows the flaws in your theory, you change the channel.

Now stop being a stinker and use your ability to think to advance the cause of truth.

That would mean leaving you behind.

Can you do that, because if you don't stop being foolish, I.m gonna have to kick your ass?

Oh boy, another cyber hero warrior. Please by all means, excuse me while a quiver, in anticipation of the impending "ass kicking".

-and I'd rather not.

I doubt you can. But I'm all a tither.

 

[commonsense]

You occupy space very well -perhaps you confuse volume with substance.

You have never credibly opposed anything I have ever said.

I occupy reason, which makes good sense.

I still like you -I hope I don't change my mind.

 

[CDNBear]

Colour me disappointed.

You occupy space very well -perhaps you confuse volume with substance.

Not at all. I try and pack as much ammo into a sentence, as Prax does, into a book.

You have never credibly opposed anything I have ever said.

So you say (That's your opinion btw.), yet you have never proven my posts wrong. Go figure.

I occupy reason, which makes good sense.

You occupy bandwidth, with nonsense.

I still like you -I hope I don't change my mind.

Give it time.

 

[DaSleeper]

Never gets tired of the same song.....Hmmmm:lol::lol::lol:
Tireless Rebutter

 

[CDNBear]

Never gets tired of the same song.....Hmmmm:lol::lol::lol:
Tireless Rebutter

His last post really disappointed me. I was all a tither waiting for a good "ass kicking", or attempted one. And well, I was spectacularly let down.

Although, to be honest, I half expected the same drivel.

 

[DaSleeper]

His last post really disappointed me. I was all a tither waiting for a good "ass kicking", or attempted one. And well, I was spectacularly let down.

Although, to be honest, I half expected the same drivel.

With only one source....surftofind..... for his ammo....he's out gunned;-)

 

[CDNBear]

With only one source....surftofind..... for his ammo....he's out gunned;-)

It's so hard to find worthy playmates these days.

Wait!!!

Did that sound arrogant?

 

[TenPenny]

Clearly, by definition, somebody who explores "who", "what", "where", when", and "why", is anything but a linear thinker.

That is one of the more silly statements on here today.

Linear thinking has nothing to do with asking or not asking questions. It simply means you get one answer before going on to another question.

Main Entry: linear thinking Part of Speech: n Definition: a process of thought following known cycles or step-by-step progression where a response to a step must be elicited before another step is taken