Taliban flog then execute
- Thread starter Kreskin
- Start date
- Status
Listen to the hypocrite who says that Kreskin has called for the mass execution of muslims and now he posts this.
Hey Les...what about tolerance and understanding?
That which we project on other people is that which we fear people will see in us....
Whereas you have been calling people in here racist, retarded, ignorant, etc.
What I meant by my comment was that you clearly advocate hate crimes against women. You support, as is clear in your posts, the whipping and execution of women and the death of young girls if they attend school.
Allegations are allegations. Prove that no-one from Canada interfered with the Saudi treatment of Sampson.
Oh, yeah, you can't because someone did make an effort.
In case you missed the idea, that means the allegations are false.
BTW, perhaps name-dropping (Amnesty Int'l) impresses you, but it doesn't impress me. AI is made of people. People make mistakes. And obviously, AI made a mistake here.
And yet he's still doing better than you. So that puts you .....
Yeah. We all know now, thanks to Bert, how awful the USA and Canada are for treating people. We must be murdering pregnant women 24/7 and taking Saudis hostage so we can torture them for years.
I never confused Americans for being very bright but wow.
:jerk:
What has led you to this conclusion?
Oh NO! I've never heard this before in this forum! I am shocked! Offended!
How original!
What a trail blazer you must be Bert!
Deduction.
How about the fact he was in Saudi control for two years and afterward harshly criticized the Canadian government , and had the backing of Amnesty International.
That's good enough evidence to me that the Canadian government failed him.
Provide me proof that the Canadian government gave any substantial effort in trying to get him released.
How is that obvious?
:jerk:
No just pillaging and raping native land while supporting American and Israeli terrorism
Brilliant
The ball is in your court. The onus is on you to prove that the government did nothing as it is public record that they did in fact assist in getting him released, regardless of what Sampson & Amnesty allege.
your evidence that they did something was a tiny quote
"random MP dude tries hard to release sampson"
and i'm saying he was jailed for two years while pleading to the Canadian government, and finally saved by the British.
there looks to be little to no evidence that the Canadian government did anything, which Amnesty International agrees with.
It's from the exact same source as your information.
"By securing a letter of forgiveness from the eldest son of bombing victim, Briton Christopher Rodway, Mr. McTeague played a key role in the freeing of Canadian William Sampson from a death sentence in Saudi Arabia."
Liberal Party of Canada
That's the allegation part.
Now you move the goalpost back by not only claiming that nothing was done (which you yourself provided proof against) but now you include the word substantial.
Well, I can try if you'll define what you mean by substantial. As far as I know you might mean that Canada still wouldn't have interfered in a substantial manner if we invaded Saudi Arabia.
I can see how it wouldn't be to someone like you. Evidence could sit on your face and shyte, but you wouldn't know what it was.
More unsubstantiated claim. How shocking. :yawn:
Yes, it was.
It's still proof that your claim is baseless and that you yourself provided it.
BTW, that was not the quote. Grow up.
And you claimed that Canada didn't do anything. You were wrong, admit it.
So? Amnesty Int'l isn't perfect:
Criticism of Amnesty International - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Last edited:
Oh another JOOOOO hater. Why am I not surprised.
I am glad you agree. I wonder why such an enlightened man such as yourself would support the whipping and execution of women and children.
Why are you people still attempting to communicate with this asshat?
I mean seriously, I love a good moron, you all know that, but I would rather be having this discussion with someone like Mhz, at least she would post some evidence that was semi on point, once in a while.
This clown isn't even capable of doing that.
I mean seriously, I love a good moron, you all know that, but I would rather be having this discussion with someone like Mhz, at least she would post some evidence that was semi on point, once in a while.
This clown isn't even capable of doing that.
I fully understand. As we all know, I take great pleasure in similar endeavors. Unlike your skillful dissection, I prefer to maul. But even a Bear with a new toy easily looses interest, when he figures out it really poses no challenge.
- Status