The Presidential Scholars weigh in:
Scholars Rank Obama the 15th Best President - Political Hotsheet - CBS News
Obama enters list at 15th. History will not be kind to his predecessor, GWB has dropped from 23rd after his first year in office, to 39th.
I don't know what they asked their ranking upon, but I don't think Obama has been iun the office for a sufficient time to rank him accurately.
An article from American Thinker by Geoffrey P. Hunt
Interesting article by a right wing hatemonger, ironsides. But he really let the cat out of the bag towards the middle of the article. He told us the real reason why he hates Obama with such a visceral passion.
It's that he's not one of us. And whatever he is, his profile is fuzzy and devoid of content, like a cardboard cutout made from delaminated corrugated paper.
And that is the nub, the right wing extremists don’t consider Obama as one of them, they don’t consider him an American. Sure they hated Clinton with a passion, but Clinton was at least a white male, he was one of them. Obama isn’t. That really summed up the reason for most of his hatred towards Obama.
No doubt he is one of those teabaggers who think that Republicans will end up with huge majorities in the Senate and the House in 2010, will win the presidency in 2012 and increase their majorities in both the houses and will bring paradise on earth in 2012, pretty much the way they brought paradise to USA from 2000 to 2008. Well, good luck with that.
Anyway, the teabagger is absolutely right, the reason teabaggers hate Obama with a passion is that he is not one of them, he is not a white male.
SJP
My apologies - Have not mastered the quote format yet.
Quoting Kreskin
What difference would that free expertise have made? None. It is what it is. Would Bush or any Rep have convinced BP (or shook them down) for 20 billion? Not a chance in a lifetime.
Bush would not have done that, he would heve done what Barton wanted done, he would have left BP to handle the leak as they saw best. BP would have done the minimum required legally (which is very little).
Bush if anything would have been even more sympathetic to BP than, Burton. Bush was an oil executive himself and as such his loyalties were with oil industry.
Point - Reading tea leaves again - No eveidence other than conjecture - next it is also easy to blame Bush for what he may have done or not done - As he is not President he is still a usefull tool for some people.
Conjecture, yes. But conjecture based upon solid evidence. Bush used to be an oil executive himself, so it stands to reason that he would give BP a free pass. Add to that the fact that his VP formulated energy policy by solely consulting oil industry (and nobody else) and it is practically a foregone conclusion that Bush would have gone much easier on BP than Obama did. Bush woudl have followed Barton's advice to the letter.
He has a big employment problem to solve to will be goodbye Mr. President in 2012.
7.9 million jobs lost, many forever.
The recession killed off 7.9 million jobs. It's increasingly likely that many will never come back.
The government jobs report issued Friday shows that businesses have slowed their pace of hiring to a relative trickle.
"The job losses during the Great Recession were so off the chart, that even though we've gained about 600,000 private sector jobs back, we've got nearly 8 million jobs to go," said Lakshman Achuthan, managing director of Economic Cycle Research Institute.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/79-million-jobs-lost-many-cnnm-1248019835.html?x=0
He is losing ground.
That should make you happy. Happy days are here again, are they? But if I were you, I would hold off celebrating the 2012 Republican victory for a while. But then again, who knows? Perhaps you have already celebrated the Republican 'victories' both in 2010 and 2012.
What are the conditions to bring those jobs back? Tax cuts? Been there done that. Deficit reduction? That would likely make the jobs issue worse.
I don't see them bringing jobs back until they start blocking the border to cheap foreign products created in markets with artificial currency values.
If Republicans come to power, they will pass massive tax cuts, mainly benefiting the rich as they did in 2000. The result will be even bigger deficit, bigger unemployment (after perhaps a brief period of recovery and prosperity), stock market crash (as usually happens during Republican administrations, during Bush eight years, stock market moved sideways, here was no increases in the stock indices during Bush eight years) and economy on the life support.