Then why comment at all? You should keep up with the changes. the USSR is not the Anti-Christ now , all Muslims are according to the vid 'Waiting for Armageddon'. Your personal view doesn't mean very much but somebody speaking that represents 50M North American Christians and is promoting the pre-emptive strike, that God would want all Christians to participate in, against Muslim dominated countries that surround Israel. Those kinds of speeches should be kept up with. Especially since many say the German people were asleep at the wheel in the 30's.Haven't seen it, and won't, doesn't interest me. It bills itself as "This Series Explores the Revelations in World Religions Regarding the Arrivals of the Antichrist Dajjal, Imam Al-Mahdi, and The Second Coming of The Christ. " I've seen enough stuff like that, and studied enough other things, to know it's all made up.
In the Bible there is an escalation in war (the most obvious sign) , when it comes to accepting the Bible's version of the days just prior to Christ arriving as the Messiah with the power of a King rather than the power of high Priest. Step one is killing all opposition in the world. Since war was predicted there is no way to tell which escalation is the final one without accepting some things the Bible points to, including angelic beings as part of those last days.Before the coming of some important prophet or apostle like Moses, Jesus, Mohammed and Al-Mahdi ... there will be many predictions and expectations and narrations and what some call it prophecies about the expected one.
That would have to be better than the lies that are being promoted today, the promotion of Islam as being the new enemy isn't something the Bible promotes, it promotes a world-wide deception so that could be the demonizing of Muslims that is the Christian blindness. (in that 'they' would promote war instead of promoting a peaceful solution that ends up benefiting both parties, like liberating $500 trillion from the Rothschild coffers. Please notice that without their willingness to fund war projects they would not happen. Until the real angelic beings start being the #1 curse on mankind we have one that we do have the power to confront openly, but since we don't and we are nothing but mice to them, i wouldn't hold my breath that awe are going to be any smarter when things get to be at there next to as bad as it can possibly get.There will be mixture of lies and truths of course: some fabrication +imagination ..etc.
According to which Book? I know the Bible has much to say about the last few years before Christ returns (on which there is a lot said) The Church is in a mess as to what is promoted and what the texts actually say. Two of the 3 vids I mentioned I can comment on with a degree of confidence that I can find Scriptural support for my view. I don't know the inner words of the Quran, but I have you and I have a starting point (the Arrivals vid)So when Jesus was about to come (I mean his first coming), John Baptist his cousin the son of Prophet Zachariah started to invite people to repent and follow the Commandments of God.
At that time, people were expecting three persons the Christ, Prophet Mohammed and the Al-Mahdi: Elia of the last days whose coming was expected through narrations and prophecies;
so they came to John and said: "You are speaking with authority! So are you the Messieh (the Christ)?"
He said: No.
They said: "Are you the Prophet?"
He said: No.
They said: "Are you Elia (who had died some thousand years ago?)"
He said: "No"
They said: "What are you then?"
He said: "I am a cry in the wilderness inviting you to repent, and I prepare the way for the Christ: the Messieh"
So there were many prophecies about Jesus: some truths mixed with many lies; and when he came some proved to be true and others false. But Jesus himself proved to be true.
From vid 35 and on there are some that cover the future and how that should unfold.The same about Prophet Mohammed and his sign: the "seal of prophecy" on his right shoulder. So many things proved true and other prophecies predicting his coming were proved false. But Prophet Mohammed himself proved to be true.
Parts 46 & 47 in particular.
I can't say I was impressed with the part on Jesus (pt 35). True there is the old Horus story but when it went into the 'real story' of Jesus it didn't cover the story the way the NT describes it which leaves the door wide open for me to challenge which version is the more 'accurate'. Perhaps some other time as this is mostly about the various versions of the future.Now Al-Mahdi also: there are many "prophecies" concerning his advent and the advent of the Messieh; certainly some are true and some are fabricated, but none can assert that the Mahdi is a fabrication according to the much many prohecies telling about him.
Just above I mentioned two parts as be 'versions' of the end days, are they accurate to how you see things playing out? Christian versions are many and varied so already they are questionable as to which one is the accurate one, and there can only be one correct version.I have not understood your question, MHz. Better explain it in summary![]()