Which, I've stated quite frequently, is basically my position also.
I know. Somehow the quote part got messed up. I was replying to YJ. Sorry.
For the 1000th time, it is scientifically proven that life begins at cellular division. Babies are viable at around 26 to 30 weeks and are therefore human. Besides that, if a human mother did the horizontal mambo with a human father, the result wouldn''t be anything else BUT human.
Your sticking to the political/legal description of human life in Canada, and declaring it to be scientific is asinine. Exactly. So you are basically saying you are confused and haven't a clue. Ya think?
That is easy: is the mother responsible for the child's environment, or is the child? The child is just the tenant up until birth, the mother is the landowner. So to speak.
Did he think she wouldn't get preggers?Didn't he?
.... and then deny having anything to do with it. In the meantime, the mother is preggers and has to deal with the entire issue, sometimes without any help from the Dick who used his dick in a dickheaded manner without concern for the consequences.
I never said the father was any less responsible.;-)