Absolutely. Sadly not going to happen, closed mindedness is next to impossible to reverse.
More then SJP is now.
So does my nine year old grand daughter............................:smile::smile::smile:
Absolutely. Sadly not going to happen, closed mindedness is next to impossible to reverse.
More then SJP is now.
You know what JLM, of that I have no doubt.So does my nine year old grand daughter............................:smile::smile::smile:
I am well aware of how it works and I am well aware of how the Democrats use that spin.
People have become hopeful
or
People have lost hope.
The Dems used the "People have lost hope" spin when they tried to explain booming employment under Bush.
"Unemployment numbers are low because people have just lost hope and are no longer looking for work...that why the unemployment numbers are down"
Well hey...keep your fingers crossed. It might be a hot summer.
Um, that couldn't be because workers are out of the system now because their unemployment ran out and they are surviving on odd jobs and savings, could it?Let's review. National month job losses/gains has steadily went from about 750K lost in January 2009 to 100K+ job gains in March 2010, and the unemployment rate is down to 9.7% from a peak of 10.2%.
Every single one of these facts is partisan Democratic spin, of course.
Um, that couldn't be because workers are out of the system now because their unemployment ran out and they are surviving on odd jobs and savings, could it?
So, are the Canadians also a miserable bunch, for electing Liberals to government again and again?
Let's review. National month job losses/gains has steadily went from about 750K lost in January 2009 to 100K+ job gains in March 2010, and the unemployment rate is down to 9.7% from a peak of 10.2%.
Every single one of these facts is partisan Democratic spin, of course.
And what is the degree of error in that method of stats gathering?No, it's not because of that. The job gains in March 2010 was due to job gains in the sectors of manufacturing, services, health, and government.
The 9.7% unemployment rate is determined by a different Bureau of Labor Statistics survey, wherein BLS calls up a sample of US households and asks if the people in the households are employed, unemployed but looking for work, or unemployed and not looking for work. Apparently, there are more people in the US employed now than in Oct. 2009 when the peak was 10.2%.
This thread is really not supposed to be about Canada. As you can see by another post that when ever a liberal goverment gets some power it turns out they cause some pretty racist situations where there were none. Now, I am talking about places in the U.S. ? Hmmm Liberal = Racism. Maybe
Miguel de Cervantes developed a character in a book that fits.I'm thinking that Porter is of the belief that liberals/democrats are all kindred spirits and that borders/nationalities are of no relevance in their struggle to fight the conservative movement.
And what is the degree of error in that method of stats gathering?
Miguel de Cervantes developed a character in a book that fits.
Immensely. It's title is "Don QUixote".I'll have to look that up.... Is it a good read?
If that's true, then I am duly impressed.As far as I know, there is no defined margin of error in BLS's household survey. If I had to guess why there is no such thing, it would be because the sample size is so large.
It's much larger than a public opinion poll like Gallup or Rasmussen, which at most may have a sample size of 2000 individuals. The BLS calls hundreds of thousands of US households every month.
What? It is a helluva read. I'm serious.
This thread is really not supposed to be about Canada. As you can see by another post that when ever a liberal goverment gets some power it turns out they cause some pretty racist situations where there were none. Now, I am talking about places in the U.S. ? Hmmm Liberal = Racism. Maybe
It isn't true, every poll has a margin of error.If that's true, then I am duly impressed.
Immensely. It's title is "Don QUixote".![]()