They are two separate bodies wulfie, as laid out in the Lateran Treaty. The Vatican City State, and the Internationally recognized State, of the Holy See.I'm a little confused on what exactly is meant by the Holy See. If we're referring to the administrative body of the Roman Catholic Church, then is it not the gov't ruling Vatican city, and not necessarily a nation but the government of one?
I get your confusion now.They are two separate bodies wulfie, as laid out in the Lateran Treaty. The Vatican City State, and the Internationally recognized State, of the Holy See.
The Vatican is not a recognized State at the UN. That is the Holy See, that is the recognized State.
This is where the confusion lies.
There's no confusion Anna. All members of the UN are recognized by title of the State. Not the hierarchy that leads it. If the Vatican, a state on to itself, was the recognized body, it would be duly noted as. Seeing as the Vatican is a State, it is not, The Holy See is. Furthermore, they have two different and distinct passports. Denoting their independent individuality and separation.I get your confusion now.
No, I think the majority of the UN and its policies are garbage. But that is not in question here. The Lateran Treaty is what stipulates the separation.All I can say is do you think everything at the UN makes sense? lol
Well I'm going to piss everyone in this thread right the effing hell off.
The Vatican is not a state. It is a religious administrative organization and really is more likely due the label of 'corporation' than state or even church.
Nah. You're just wrong. The Vatican is a city state.Well I'm going to piss everyone in this thread right the effing hell off.
The Vatican is not a state. It is a religious administrative organization and really is more likely due the label of 'corporation' than state or even church.
It's also a chunk of real estate and a homeland to citizens.Canada is a corporation that operates on "political philosophy" as opposed to "spiritual philosophy"
Canada is a corporation that operates on "political philosophy" as opposed to "spiritual philosophy"
Let's not get all bent out of shape peeps. This thread has the potential to go in a couple directions. One is positive the other not so.
Just so we keep it off the radar and avoid creating more work for Ron and Hazmart, lest try and focus on the topic. Please, with all due respects.
Isn't that a Principality?I suppose "Monaco" would not be a City State either.......
Not trying to derail...just making a comparison......
I'm not going to argue with that eh1. I agree.It's still not a state. At least not because it said so. I say I'm smart all the time but that doesn't make it true. The last place I would look is here. Vatican City State - Homepage. They will also tell you how to live and how to die like you can't think for yourself. I think this thread can go a long way if we avoid using the RCC as reference material for the affairs of actual countries and their interactions.
Can a case be made that the Holy See and by extension the Vatican, does not fit the definition of State, as defined by International Law?
As was used to define Afghanistan as a failed state, by NATO and later by the UN. The Holy See, can too be viewed as a failed state, for having willfully, both covertly and overtly circumventing International Law, under the Convention of the rights of the Child.
?? A lot of Canada's suffixes (or whatever) are .ca and not .com, so?So if I put up a website saying my house is a 'city state' would you believe that too. That is a website published by the Vatican. Notice the .va instead of .com or what ever. Sorry Anna, can't buy that one.
Monaco is a sovereign principality.I suppose "Monaco" would not be a City State either.......
Not trying to derail...just making a comparison......