While you applaud McGuinty's judgement in that, so did the Ontario electorate, giving McGuinty's Liberals 2 back to back majorities.
Look I am not pointing fingers, Did McGuinty inherit a bad financial problem? he did!
Did Harper inherit a bad financial problem from the Liberals? No he didn't! Harper inherited $12 Billion surplus, was faced with a down turn of the economy, and because they did not have a good solid fiscal financial plan, they look bad, the polls tell the story. and had Martin still be the financial balancing act, the $100 Billion on top of the Federal dept would have been smaller much smaller may be in the $50 Billion rather then $100b.
So yes he did and the reason is not the Liberals.
That's why they are called "Sheeple" when they feel their party can do no wrong...... "Any Party" faithfulHow come recession doesn't enter your mind when it comes to anyone else but it is a great excuse when a Liberal does just what you say they don't do? I'm telling you they are ALL the same once they have suckered you out of your vote. Anyone who votes the party line isn't thinking with their heads ... and anyone who condemns one for what the others would do in the same situation is blind to all reason.
"Quite so. Let us look at the contrast between Harper and Mulroney."
So, why are you talking about McGuinty?
That's why they are called "Sheeple" when they feel their party can do no wrong...... "Any Party" faithful
How come recession doesn't enter your mind when it comes to anyone else but it is a great excuse when a Liberal does just what you say they don't do? I'm telling you they are ALL the same once they have suckered you out of your vote. Anyone who votes the party line isn't thinking with their heads ... and anyone who condemns one for what the others would do in the same situation is blind to all reason.
Good day LW,
First off, the devil of the lesser evil did not sucker me into squandering my vote. I am on record through the past voting for that devil.
Second, did the Dalton McGuinty Liberals campaign on the premise that "let us in office so we can clean up the mess" and did worse?
Third did McGuinty Liberals said we wont run deficits during campaigning? the answer is obvious no, because they new the financial mess left behind by Harris and Rae was involving deficits no matter who would take over.
When you have two political parties and they both have **** on their report card, to vote for the one with the lesser sh!t is not voting party line, it is simply voting for the one who is going to do less harm to the country.
And forth stating that choosing the devil of the lesser evil to be blind to all reason, is a huge stretch and self serving to boot.
Also you are on record applauding McGuinty's management while you through rocks at me for the same opinion as you, on McGuinty's performance.
Inspit of this defrence of opinion I still like u.;-)
Sock.... Please read before you post ... and stop attributing all your nonsense to me. You don't want to be corrected? Stop saying stupid things.
BTW.... According to Liberalbabble, McGuinty cleaned up the 6 billion dollar surprise Harris deficit. If they (Liberals) are such great fiscal managers, why the deficit now?
Get off the rhetoric. Your routine becoming terribly boring.
They're nuts?Tell me this why did Ontarians give McGuinty a second majority in 2007?
Tell me this why did Ontarians give McGuinty a second majority in 2007?
I suppose more votes for Liberal than for PC and NDP would give then a win. It ain't rocket science. Scared of socialist and had enough of the Harris/Eves version of Common Sense.
The point way back when that you seem to want to smoke screen away is the proof that your statement that Liberals don't go into debt is completely wrong - as proven in the McGuinty budget. With his union-unfriendly measures, we might very well have another NDP government next round.
How about this, why then, the Liberal history shows unequivocally to be a longer history in Canadian politics, then that of any other political party?;-)
In such a long history for the Liberals (69 years) a couple of incidents doesn’t sink the Liberal ship.:lol:What has that got to do with LIBERALS DON'T RUN DEFICITS? If you want political science classes, pay and go to school like anyone else would have to.
In such a long history for the Liberals (69 years) a couple of incident doesn’t sink the Liberal ship.:lol:
Perhaps because most Canadians' mentalities have been indistinguishable from sheep.How about this, why then, the Liberal history shows unequivocally to be a longer history in Canadian politics, then that of any other political party?;-)
Apparently even criminal activity in the ranks can't even do that. Longevity is not necessarily qualitative.In such a long history for the Liberals (69 years) a couple of incidents doesn’t sink the Liberal ship.:lol:
I think I saw a couple of hundred incidents in another post ... and that was just one regime....
Perhaps the glib tag is justly earned.
I follow my feet, not numbers.At this point you and I agree to disagree, 69 years mean nothing to you, while 69 years is a strong number to follow.;-)
Perhaps because most Canadians' mentalities have been indistinguishable from sheep.