Raw Milk Victories

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
Because as soon as that person gets sick, it's the taxpayer that has to take care of them. If the illness turns chronic, then it's even more money spent to take care of something that should never have happened in the first place.

I think that's good in theory, except it's not applied equally...think junk food, stupid drivers, alcohol abuse, and a great number of other things that "should never have happened in the first place."
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Uhn, I think that's a different kind of mold (bread)... :-|

Seriously countryboy, you have no idea how funny I find it that you're going on about raw milk and how people are too paranoid and don't get enough good bacterias, etc... and then you're all stressed about mold. lol. You do know that pretty much everything the wrong mold can do to your cheese, the wrong bacteria can do to your raw milk too, right?

Eat a balanced diet rich in anti-oxidants and a spot or two of mold on your cheese won't make you keel over from cancer. :lol:
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
Seriously countryboy, you have no idea how funny I find it that you're going on about raw milk and how people are too paranoid and don't get enough good bacterias, etc... and then you're all stressed about mold. lol. You do know that pretty much everything the wrong mold can do to your cheese, the wrong bacteria can do to your raw milk too, right?

Eat a balanced diet rich in anti-oxidants and a spot or two of mold on your cheese won't make you keel over from cancer. :lol:

Couldn't agree with you more on the anti-oxidant diet, Karrie. However, I'm not stressed out about the blue (or green) cheese...the Health Depts. are though...they made a big deal of it when inspecting restaurants and their cheese supplies here in BC. They specifically mentioned carcinogens as being "dangerous" to health.

Now, you wouldn't want to ignore such a stern warning from an official representative of the government, would you? ;-)
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Couldn't agree with you more on the anti-oxidant diet, Karrie. However, I'm not stressed out about the blue (or green) cheese...the Health Depts. are though...they made a big deal of it when inspecting restaurants and their cheese supplies here in BC. They specifically mentioned carcinogens as being "dangerous" to health.

Now, you wouldn't want to ignore such a stern warning from an official representative of the government, would you? ;-)

Time and context countryboy. Am I getting the cheese for less money? How moldy is it? Is the risk a theoretical risk (might make me sick one day years down the road from cumulative consumption), or an imminent risk (could make me deathly ill right the heck now).

If a meal came to me at a restaurant with a spot of mold on the cheese you can bet I'll be sending it back and likely finding a different place to eat. lol. Double standards are funny like that. And, much like dealing with a farmer, having to worry about what I CAN'T see doesn't sit well with me (thus I love those pesky government rules).
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
Time and context countryboy. Am I getting the cheese for less money? How moldy is it? Is the risk a theoretical risk (might make me sick one day years down the road from cumulative consumption), or an imminent risk (could make me deathly ill right the heck now).

If a meal came to me at a restaurant with a spot of mold on the cheese you can bet I'll be sending it back and likely finding a different place to eat. lol. Double standards are funny like that. And, much like dealing with a farmer, having to worry about what I CAN'T see doesn't sit well with me (thus I love those pesky government rules).

Also agree with you on that, Karrie...the brains are up there to be utilized!

The "government" does have a lot of rules, and many of them are good...especially in the Health Inspection area (restaurants). When we owned a restaurant, I found that they can be quite helpful if an operator wants to cooperate. I think we had 7 different inspectors throughout those years, and each one of them was a bit different, but all quite helpful. Some of the older, more experienced ones were a lot of fun...one of them was a big believer in sanitizing countertops with plain vinegar, while the next one insisted on bleach, and so on...but hey, they're human too. Even though we never had any in stock, none of them would tolerate moldy cheese. :lol:

The biggest compliment to us was that most of them ended up becoming customers, bringing friends and family out for dinners...that's probably the best "word of mouth" advertising there is!
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
.... none of them would tolerate moldy cheese. :lol:

Well, it makes sense on numerous levels from a food safe viewpoint. I've known people who will go into anaphylactic (sp?) shock from eating cheese that had mold on it. Plus you don't want to give anyone a green light to make that their exclusive source of cheese... lol.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
mmmm Blue cheese has flavor. Yumyum. The ones I don't like are the ones that taste as bad as they smell, like limburger, morbier, muenster, vieux bologna (or however it's spelled), etc.
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
I'm assuming that the restriction on moldy cheese is on cheese that isn't supposed to be moldy....my father loved blue cheese. Ugh.

I'm not an expert on cheese, but I suspect the problem lies somewhere in the "good bacteria" and "bad bacteria" categories.

I had some Italian friends down in Toronto that would indulge in "maggot cheese" whenever someone could sneak it in from Italy. They would sit around a table with lots of wine and Italian bread, cut the cheese (excuse the expression) open, let it begin to ooze out, find the parts that were moving (the maggots), and proceed to sop them up with the bread and eat them. Mm-mm good...to them. I tried, but couldn't consume enough wine to give it a try. :lol:
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
I've eaten bugs before. That isn't a biggie, but if my nose doesn't like something, it's quite likely my taste buds won't. lol
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
I remember my brother talking about how he stopped at a cheese shop in Kensington, to buy his favorite cheese. Then he and his wife took the train to Kingston. They noticed that over the trip, other passengers moved down to the other end of the car. It was the horrendous smell of the cheese...
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
I remember my brother talking about how he stopped at a cheese shop in Kensington, to buy his favorite cheese. Then he and his wife took the train to Kingston. They noticed that over the trip, other passengers moved down to the other end of the car. It was the horrendous smell of the cheese...

What's that old saying? "One you get past the smell, you've got it licked!"

(It probably tasted better than it smelled...) :lol:
 

cdn_bc_ca

Electoral Member
May 5, 2005
389
1
18
Vancouver
I think that's good in theory, except it's not applied equally...think junk food, stupid drivers, alcohol abuse, and a great number of other things that "should never have happened in the first place."

You got a point... so the best thing to do is not to add anything more to that list... one less burden to worry about.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
You got a point... so the best thing to do is not to add anything more to that list... one less burden to worry about.

Perhaps in a perfect world unsafe things shouldn't happen or be created, but the govt need not be our nanny and be telling us what we want to put in our bodies. Drugs, explosives, alcohol, and milk are potentially dangerous substances and require regulation, not prohibition. Come on, let's grow up here. The world is not always a safe place. What is good for me, may not be good for you, and we live in such a world.
 

cdn_bc_ca

Electoral Member
May 5, 2005
389
1
18
Vancouver
Perhaps in a perfect world unsafe things shouldn't happen or be created, but the govt need not be our nanny and be telling us what we want to put in our bodies. Drugs, explosives, alcohol, and milk are potentially dangerous substances and require regulation, not prohibition. Come on, let's grow up here. The world is not always a safe place. What is good for me, may not be good for you, and we live in such a world.

In the case of Raw Milk, whether it's good for you or not, if the distribution channel has the potential to harm hundreds of Canadians, the govt needs to be involved. If you don't agree, I suggest you buy your food directly from China and see (and possibly feel) the difference regulation makes.

The govt has applied regulations to protect the public in general. If you think otherwise, then there is nothing stopping you from milking your own cow, however, the burden of your mistake when you become ill should not fall upon the taxpayer.

Again, if you don't believe me, you can always take a trip down to some third world country and buy some dinner at a makeshift stand on the side of the road where the water used to make your noodles is the same water they used to wash the dishes with. I'm not joking about that last part. To hell with the govt nannies!
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
In the case of Raw Milk, whether it's good for you or not, if the distribution channel has the potential to harm hundreds of Canadians, the govt needs to be involved. If you don't agree, I suggest you buy your food directly from China and see (and possibly feel) the difference regulation makes.

The govt has applied regulations to protect the public in general. If you think otherwise, then there is nothing stopping you from milking your own cow, however, the burden of your mistake when you become ill should not fall upon the taxpayer.

Again, if you don't believe me, you can always take a trip down to some third world country and buy some dinner at a makeshift stand on the side of the road where the water used to make your noodles is the same water they used to wash the dishes with. I'm not joking about that last part. To hell with the govt nannies!

well said
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
In the case of Raw Milk, whether it's good for you or not, if the distribution channel has the potential to harm hundreds of Canadians, the govt needs to be involved. If you don't agree, I suggest you buy your food directly from China and see (and possibly feel) the difference regulation makes.

The govt has applied regulations to protect the public in general. If you think otherwise, then there is nothing stopping you from milking your own cow, however, the burden of your mistake when you become ill should not fall upon the taxpayer.

Again, if you don't believe me, you can always take a trip down to some third world country and buy some dinner at a makeshift stand on the side of the road where the water used to make your noodles is the same water they used to wash the dishes with. I'm not joking about that last part. To hell with the govt nannies!

I have no problems with some basic sanitation and health regulations on food. But, I think you're going a bit overboard on the "burden of your mistake..." statement.

If everything was so perfect, it's doubtful we'd be seeing the epidemic of obesity and diabetes these days. I believe that burden is indeed food-related and it is falling on the shoulders of the taxpayers, is it not? Now how on earth did that happen?

I'm not advocating a free-for-all on these things...I'm looking for a choice in milk.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
If everything was so perfect, it's doubtful we'd be seeing the epidemic of obesity and diabetes these days.QUOTE]

The problem people have re: obesity and diabetes belongs
to them, I get very tired of 'others' being blamed for
the poor choices and overconsumption of food by people who
are lazy, don't do anything, eat too much, and depend on
everyone else, plus pills, to rid them of their problems.

We preach 'choice', but so many don't bother to make the
right one.

No one force feeds the wrong food or drink to anyone, with the
exception of 'what' parents feed their children.

Those who manufacture and sell, depend on the purchase of
those products, and if they don't sell, 'poof' out of
business, and if more people were smarter when they open
their purses, there would be many more, out of business.