Panic or trepidation?
Allow me to reiterate.... Are you planning on saying something that makes sense soon?
Sense of urgency before a deadline!?
Nope. A model is a tool for projecting, forecasting, predicting etc. based on data entered into it. In itself it can never become evidence. The prediction it makes isn't evidence either, because it is basically, an educated guess. It's accuracy can never be 100% and depending on the bias of the modler, might even be used to deceive.Hmm..... Don'cha suppose that all depends on what you did with the model? ;-)
There you have the answer to your question. They're tools for predicting.Models have correctly predicted many results in genetics, which is a highly dynamic study just like the climate.
And there you have it again. They are based on evidence. They use data that is entered into them. They are not themselves evidence. And if the modler is corrupt, so will be the results of the model.Models incorporate laws of physics obtained by observation. That is, they are based on evidence.
Not quite true. I've heard you need 2 - 3 weeks of -40, but there's other factors that come into consideration. First it depends on the depth of snow. The beetles descend to the roots for the winter and if the snow is too deep, the cold will never reach them, even over 6 weeks (which, as you say, never happens). However if cold comes early in the year as it did in October of '85, the beetles have not yet formed their antifreeze and there isn't sufficient snow to protect them and you don't need it that cold or that duration. Even so, while the spruce beetles were done in, the pine beetles bounced back. I don't know what factors influenced that."The beetles killed the trees because global warming let them survive in a warmer Winter. In the past the cold Winters always killed the beetles. This is just one more thing that global warming is doing to us."
I'm far from an expert on the matter but I think that may be a bit of an oversimpification. To kill the Mountain Pine Beetle according to the scientists we need 6 weeks of minus 40 weather and early in the season if possible. In British Columbia we don't and never have had minus 40 for 6 consecutive weeks anywhere. Generally speaking we even get a mid winter thaw most places, even the Peace River many years. I'd be very surprised if a 0.74C change in temperature has allowed the M.P.B. to survive where it otherwise wouldn't. Anyone have any more evidence? (Anecdotal or statistical)
Nah, we got under -40 quite often here. The winter of the first gulf war is memorable to me because that's the one where we reached -46C (50 below) right in downtown Prince George. Not at all pleasant.Under 40°C is what is needed for 100% bark beetle mortality. You don't need 100% bark beetle mortality to contain the spread of the species. But you do need it when other factors are changing. Warmer growing seasons has expanded the habitat that the beetles can invade, and it also speeds up the life cycles of the beetle. When that happens, you do need -40°C, which we don't and never got, except at very high elevations.
NO, that's what the evidence supports. If it didn't, why do the alarmists have to use fraud to get the results they want? Do you really think they would do that if they didn't have to?Really? You mean that's what the evidence you like supports.
I asked why the infestation hadn't occured in the south long ago, since the bug already is there and if it was just a matter of temperatures, then nothing would have prevented them wiping out all pine trees in that area eons ago.Yup. You asked why the bug hasn't moved south. I mentioned that it's most likely comfortable here.
Nope.And eventually the sun will cook Earth. So what? Does that mean we still pollute the planet and expect it not to bite back?
That bias is all in the eye of the beholder. It's just a fact, we need oil and guess who is going to supply it.... with an apparent bias.
My argument hasn't been made yet. The dispute over modeling doesn't come into it.I already have an excuse, just like I explained before, I'm not a climatologist nor involved in any related sciences. So it's a bit difficult for me to debate the science of it since I'm not an expert and won't try and pretend to be one either.
Seems to me your argument isn't based on climate but based on whether or not modeling is accurate. It's a red herring.
They can be. If a model gives results that are in accord with what's observed, the model is evidence that the assumptions and processes it's built from have something to do with reality.And there you have it again. They are based on evidence. They use data that is entered into them. They are not themselves evidence.
Socialists in a panic!? Like if China was panicking!
Yes, I do. I met Paul Watson. He's a crackpot. I also met Suzuki. He isn't so much of a crackpot. He's only a little extreme sometimes. But, as much as I think alarmists have a plan, so do deniers, and I don't think all of them have their poop in a group either.NO, that's what the evidence supports. If it didn't, why do the alarmists have to use fraud to get the results they want? Do you really think they would do that if they didn't have to?
And I didn't say that temperature was the only factor. You just assumed I did.I asked why the infestation hadn't occured in the south long ago, since the bug already is there and if it was just a matter of temperatures, then nothing would have prevented them wiping out all pine trees in that area eons ago.
It's a relief to know that you think that way.Nope.
When we are done converting my Dakota to electric drive and synthetic lubes. I won't need petroleum. Those greedy bastards get my thumbed nose.That bias is all in the eye of the beholder. It's just a fact, we need oil and guess who is going to supply it.
It was really strange,no warning,like someone kicked the rock out,you had to be there.:-?It was a $60.00 cam or I would have had a nice video but I was on the deck haveing a coffee and a smoke when that came down and I ran out of memory when the rest came down.
Kinda neat. We were climbing one time and saw a chimney close a little bit.rocks from inside the chimney shot out like a baseball pitcher threw them out and a rat's nest that was partway up disintegrated. It was cool. All we felt was a little tap barely noticeable in the rock.It was a $60.00 cam or I would have had a nice video but I was on the deck haveing a coffee and a smoke when that came down and I ran out of memory when the rest came down.