Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

Status
Not open for further replies.

big

Time Out
Oct 15, 2009
562
4
18
Quebec
I don't care what your version of things is. An hypothesis is NOT developed to avoid proofs. It is developed to define the parameters of and initiate investigation of the proofs. Get a grip.

There is no such hypothesis for linear regressions.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,871
116
63
Tuesday, November 24, 2009

EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling

THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Scientific progress depends on accurate and complete data. It also relies on replication. The past couple of days have uncovered some shocking revelations about the baloney practices that pass as sound science about climate change.
It was announced Thursday afternoon that computer hackers had obtained 160 megabytes of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in England. Those e-mails involved communication among many scientific researchers and policy advocates with similar ideological positions all across the world. Those purported authorities were brazenly discussing the destruction and hiding of data that did not support global-warming claims.
Professor Phil Jones, the head of the Climate Research Unit, and professor Michael E. Mann at Pennsylvania State University, who has been an important scientist in the climate debate, have come under particular scrutiny. Among his e-mails, Mr. Jones talked to Mr. Mann about the "trick of adding in the real temps to each series ... to hide the decline [in temperature]."
Mr. Mann admitted that he was party to this conversation and lamely explained to the New York Times that "scientists often used the word 'trick' to refer to a good way to solve a problem 'and not something secret.' " Though the liberal New York newspaper apparently buys this explanation, we have seen no benign explanation that justifies efforts by researchers to skew data on so-called global-warming "to hide the decline." Given the controversies over the accuracy of Mr. Mann's past research, it is surprising his current explanations are accepted so readily.
There is a lot of damning evidence about these researchers concealing information that counters their bias. In another exchange, Mr. Jones told Mr. Mann: "If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the UK, I think I'll delete the file rather than send to anyone" and, "We also have a data protection act, which I will hide behind." Mr. Jones further urged Mr. Mann to join him in deleting e-mail exchanges about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) controversial assessment report (ARA): "Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re [the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report]?"
In another e-mail, Mr. Jones told Mr. Mann, professor Malcolm K. Hughes of the University of Arizona and professor Raymond S. Bradley of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst: "I'm getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don't any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom of Information Act!"
At one point, Mr. Jones complained to another academic, "I did get an email from the [Freedom of Information] person here early yesterday to tell me I shouldn't be deleting emails." He also offered up more dubious tricks of his trade, specifically that "IPCC is an international organization, so is above any national FOI. Even if UEA holds anything about IPCC, we are not obliged to pass it on." Another professor at the Climate Research Unit, Tim Osborn, discussed in e-mails how truncating a data series can hide a cooling trend that otherwise would be seen in the results. Mr. Mann sent Mr. Osborn an e-mail saying that the results he was sending shouldn't be shown to others because the data support critics of global warming.
Repeatedly throughout the e-mails that have been made public, proponents of global-warming theories refer to data that has been hidden or destroyed. Only e-mails from Mr. Jones' institution have been made public, and with his obvious approach to deleting sensitive files, it's difficult to determine exactly how much more information has been lost that could be damaging to the global-warming theocracy and its doomsday forecasts.
We don't condone e-mail theft by hackers, though these e-mails were covered by Britain's Freedom of Information Act and should have been released. The content of these e-mails raises extremely serious questions that could end the academic careers of many prominent professors. Academics who have purposely hidden data, destroyed information and doctored their results have committed scientific fraud. We can only hope respected academic institutions such as Pennsylvania State University, the University of Arizona and the University of Massachusetts at Amherst conduct proper investigative inquiries.
Most important, however, these revelations of fudged science should have a cooling effect on global-warming hysteria and the panicked policies that are being pushed forward to address the unproven theory.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Tuesday, November 24, 2009

EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling

THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Scientific progress depends on accurate and complete data. It also relies on replication. The past couple of days have uncovered some shocking revelations about the baloney practices that pass as sound science about climate change.
AAaaahh, back to the topic. Awesome!
Shyte happens. That's why it's important to not accept unsupportive or supportive data at face value.
The fact still remains that the last decade has been the warmest of the last 200 years and the fact that the average mean temperatures fluctuate but the trend has been higher temps.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Rather than repeat myself addressing Walt's multiple cut and pastes on the same topic over multiple threads, I think I'll just link back to the post in the thread where he first brought this up.

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/climate-change/73658-death-knell-agw-26.html#post1177334

The long and short is, there was no hiding, in the nefarious sense of the word. The original author of the proxy Mann used-Keith Briffa- suggests that it not be used after the 1960 period, due to divergence.

If you don't know what divergence is, and why you should not use a proxy portion which contains divergence, and you are actually interested in the substance of these issues, read these:
http://www.wsl.ch/staff/jan.esper/publications/Wilson_2007_JGR.pdf
http://www.wsl.ch/staff/jan.esper/publications/Esper_2009_CC_PIT.pdf
http://www.weissfluhjoch.ch/staff/paolo.cherubini/pdf/DarrigoetGlobalPlanCh.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1692171/pdf/43XA8LK6PCMVMH9H_353_65.pdf
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Rather than repeat myself addressing Walt's multiple cut and pastes on the same topic over multiple threads, I think I'll just link back to the post in the thread where he first brought this up.

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/climate-change/73658-death-knell-agw-26.html#post1177334

The long and short is, there was no hiding, in the nefarious sense of the word. The original author of the proxy Mann used-Keith Briffa- suggests that it not be used after the 1960 period, due to divergence.

If you don't know what divergence is, and why you should not use a proxy portion which contains divergence, and you are actually interested in the substance of these issues, read these:
http://www.wsl.ch/staff/jan.esper/publications/Wilson_2007_JGR.pdf
http://www.wsl.ch/staff/jan.esper/publications/Esper_2009_CC_PIT.pdf
http://www.weissfluhjoch.ch/staff/paolo.cherubini/pdf/DarrigoetGlobalPlanCh.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1692171/pdf/43XA8LK6PCMVMH9H_353_65.pdf
Well, you know, I think it's the drowning man grasping at a straw. We have to give Walter some credit for being persistent though. He'll probably be sitting in front of his air-conditioner one January day still posting about the occasional cool month being proof about the impending ice-age.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,944
7,683
113
B.C.
Well, you know, I think it's the drowning man grasping at a straw. We have to give Walter some credit for being persistent though. He'll probably be sitting in front of his air-conditioner one January day still posting about the occasional cool month being proof about the impending ice-age.
I am waitng for that day as well.
The older I get the colder it feels.
I am starting to understand the snowbird attraction.
Please give me summer in winter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

big

Time Out
Oct 15, 2009
562
4
18
Quebec
I am waitng for that day as well.
The older I get the colder it feels.
I am starting to understand the snowbird attraction.
Please give me summer in winter.

It will be delivered to you via hurricanes and tornadoes.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
I am waitng for that day as well.
The older I get the colder it feels.
I am starting to understand the snowbird attraction.
Please give me summer in winter.
Well, there you go. You can become Walter's neighbor in Nunavut in a couple decades and enjoy the pleasantly hot winters there and chat about the impending global ice-ages over a coffee. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.