Palestinians elected Hamas.
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Q&A: Hamas election victory
That gives them legitimacy to represent the Palestinian people, whether we like them or not.
Palestine's official status is an occupied state. Technically Palestinians are at war with the occupying nation (Israel). According to international laws governing war, Palestinians have the right to resist their occupation, even by violent means. In other words, Palestinian militants have a legal right to attack Israeli soldiers in Gaza and in Israel. Israeli soldiers also have a legal right to defend themselves even by violent means and enter Gaza to fight Palestinian militants. Israel also has a legal right to block arms from entering Gaza.
But Israel has no right to block food, medicine and other humanitarian essentials from entering Gaza. Nor does Israel have the right to attack Gaza civilians or destroy their livelihood by blocking the free flow of civilian goods and services. As a direct consequence of these illegal Israeli actions, 1.5 million people suffer extreme poverty, disease and malnitrition. That part of Israel's blockade is a form of collective punishment and a crime against humanity.
Israel and Hamas agreed to a truce in June 2008. According to the agreed terms, Hamas would stop launching rockets and mortars at Israel, and Israel would allow food, medicine and other necessities into Gaza. Hamas held up its end of the bargain. They stopped attacking Israel and arrested anyone that did:
Hamas arrests militants after rocket fire | Reuters
The trend during the 2008 truce was fewer and fewer attacks. In May 2008, Palestinian militants fired 206 rockets and 149 mortars at Israel. In October 2008, militants fired 1 rocket and 1 mortar.
In response to reduced attacks Israel continued its humanitarian and economic blockade in violation of the terms of the truce. As the number of attacks decreased, Israel counter-intuitively reduced the amount of aid entering Gaza.
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Guide: Gaza under blockade
If Israel was truly interested in peace, they would have rewarded Hamas's efforts to stop all rocket and mortar attacks. As the number of attacks decreased, the amount of aid entering Gaza should have increased as per their truce agreement. At no time during the truce did Israel ever hold up their end of the agreement and appeared to punish Gazans for reducing their attacks to almost none.
On November 4, 2008, Israel blatantly and violently broke their truce agreement with Hamas by sending commandos into Gaza and killing Hamas operatives digging a hole.
Gaza truce broken as Israeli raid kills six Hamas gunmen | World news | guardian.co.uk
Digging a hole isn't a hostile act until that hole crosses the border into Israel. Israel has never offered any proof that the hole served any offensive purpose. Hamas claims it was a defensive fortification. The truce never required Hamas to stop building defensive fortications, training their members or acquiring arms. Hamas only agreed to stop attacking Israel.
During Operation Cast Lead, Israel committed a series of war crimes and crimes against humanity, including using chemical weapons against civilians, using civilians including children as human shields, deliberately attacking civilians and civilian infrastructure...
You can read about it here in the Amnesty International report:
http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/a...a74-4853-860f-0563725e633a/mde150152009en.pdf
From the report:
Deliberately destroying civilian infrastructure including Gaza's ability to produce food is a war crime. Since Operation Cast Lead, Israeli forces regularly attack Gaza farmers attempting to work their land and destroy their crops.
ei: Israel destroying Gaza's farmlands
As a result, Gazans are less able to produce food and their need for humanitarian aid has increased. Meanwhile Israel maintains their illegal humanitarian aid blockade.
My point in posting the above isn't to support one side or the other, but accurately post facts to counter the misinformation by Israel's supporters on this forum as well as the inaccurate, misleading and selective truth propaganda rampant in our news media regarding this conflict.
I don't support violence or violent organizations. I support peaceful non-violent resistance in response to violence, injustice and oppression. I also support people knowing all the facts as objectively reported by human rights organizations like Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, B'tselem...
Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories | Amnesty International Report 2009
Israel and the Occupied Territories | Human Rights Watch
B'Tselem - The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Q&A: Hamas election victory
That gives them legitimacy to represent the Palestinian people, whether we like them or not.
Palestine's official status is an occupied state. Technically Palestinians are at war with the occupying nation (Israel). According to international laws governing war, Palestinians have the right to resist their occupation, even by violent means. In other words, Palestinian militants have a legal right to attack Israeli soldiers in Gaza and in Israel. Israeli soldiers also have a legal right to defend themselves even by violent means and enter Gaza to fight Palestinian militants. Israel also has a legal right to block arms from entering Gaza.
But Israel has no right to block food, medicine and other humanitarian essentials from entering Gaza. Nor does Israel have the right to attack Gaza civilians or destroy their livelihood by blocking the free flow of civilian goods and services. As a direct consequence of these illegal Israeli actions, 1.5 million people suffer extreme poverty, disease and malnitrition. That part of Israel's blockade is a form of collective punishment and a crime against humanity.
Israel and Hamas agreed to a truce in June 2008. According to the agreed terms, Hamas would stop launching rockets and mortars at Israel, and Israel would allow food, medicine and other necessities into Gaza. Hamas held up its end of the bargain. They stopped attacking Israel and arrested anyone that did:
Hamas arrests militants after rocket fire | Reuters
The trend during the 2008 truce was fewer and fewer attacks. In May 2008, Palestinian militants fired 206 rockets and 149 mortars at Israel. In October 2008, militants fired 1 rocket and 1 mortar.
In response to reduced attacks Israel continued its humanitarian and economic blockade in violation of the terms of the truce. As the number of attacks decreased, Israel counter-intuitively reduced the amount of aid entering Gaza.
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Guide: Gaza under blockade
If Israel was truly interested in peace, they would have rewarded Hamas's efforts to stop all rocket and mortar attacks. As the number of attacks decreased, the amount of aid entering Gaza should have increased as per their truce agreement. At no time during the truce did Israel ever hold up their end of the agreement and appeared to punish Gazans for reducing their attacks to almost none.
On November 4, 2008, Israel blatantly and violently broke their truce agreement with Hamas by sending commandos into Gaza and killing Hamas operatives digging a hole.
Gaza truce broken as Israeli raid kills six Hamas gunmen | World news | guardian.co.uk
Digging a hole isn't a hostile act until that hole crosses the border into Israel. Israel has never offered any proof that the hole served any offensive purpose. Hamas claims it was a defensive fortification. The truce never required Hamas to stop building defensive fortications, training their members or acquiring arms. Hamas only agreed to stop attacking Israel.
During Operation Cast Lead, Israel committed a series of war crimes and crimes against humanity, including using chemical weapons against civilians, using civilians including children as human shields, deliberately attacking civilians and civilian infrastructure...
You can read about it here in the Amnesty International report:
http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/a...a74-4853-860f-0563725e633a/mde150152009en.pdf
From the report:
...Many of the houses, factories and farms were bulldozed and many of the houses were
destroyed with Israeli anti-tank mines, as evident from the remains of the mines that littered
the destroyed neighbourhoods, and from the pattern of destruction resulting from this
method. Although designed to be used against tanks, these mines can also be set off
remotely. Israeli forces have often used them to destroy Palestinian houses in the West Bank
and at times also in Gaza.
The fact that the soldiers used this method – which required them to leave their tanks, walk
between buildings and enter houses in order to place the explosive charges inside the houses
along the supporting walls – indicates that they felt extremely confident that there were no
Palestinian gunmen inside or around the houses. It also indicates their confidence that there
were no tunnels under the houses which gunmen could use to capture them, and that the
houses were not booby-trapped. Had the soldiers believed that they were in danger of being
shot, blown up or captured, they would not have ventured out of their tanks to place the
mines inside the houses....
http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/a...a74-4853-860f-0563725e633a/mde150152009en.pdf
Deliberately destroying civilian infrastructure including Gaza's ability to produce food is a war crime. Since Operation Cast Lead, Israeli forces regularly attack Gaza farmers attempting to work their land and destroy their crops.
ei: Israel destroying Gaza's farmlands
As a result, Gazans are less able to produce food and their need for humanitarian aid has increased. Meanwhile Israel maintains their illegal humanitarian aid blockade.
My point in posting the above isn't to support one side or the other, but accurately post facts to counter the misinformation by Israel's supporters on this forum as well as the inaccurate, misleading and selective truth propaganda rampant in our news media regarding this conflict.
I don't support violence or violent organizations. I support peaceful non-violent resistance in response to violence, injustice and oppression. I also support people knowing all the facts as objectively reported by human rights organizations like Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, B'tselem...
Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories | Amnesty International Report 2009
Israel and the Occupied Territories | Human Rights Watch
B'Tselem - The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories