You don't understand what the word conservative means, most conservatives don't.
It Is Official: Limbaugh Resigns as ‘Head’ of Republican Party.
- Thread starter SirJosephPorter
- Start date
You don't understand what the word conservative means, most conservatives don't.
Once again, SirJosephPorter, although it is a leadpipe cinch that you WILL NOT come to your senses. You never have, so there is no hope now, but here it goes:
Limbaugh has always been against using ILLEGAL drugs as a recreational activity, to get a high and to escape reality. The drugs he sought out were never ILLEGAL and he sought them out strictly for getting a few normal, pain-free minutes in a long day.
If his wife had been a doctor, who could have prescribed any drug in any amount, he probably would not have had to go out of his way to find LEGAL prescription drug for unbearable pain.
Unless you had a pain that was ruining your life night and day, and unless you were suffering so much that you did what Limbaugh did, SHUT UP, you have no clue (as usual) what you are talking about and you have no right to anyone a hypocrit, because there is none bigger than you.
Until I had my operation I went thru unbearable pain. Morphine every two hours. Only a punk who can have unlimited supply of presciption drugs prescribed by a close relative refuses to understand what pain is and what people do to relieve it. And/or a total hypocrit. Or should I say liberal?
Limbaugh has always been against using ILLEGAL drugs as a recreational activity, to get a high and to escape reality. The drugs he sought out were never ILLEGAL and he sought them out strictly for getting a few normal, pain-free minutes in a long day.
If his wife had been a doctor, who could have prescribed any drug in any amount, he probably would not have had to go out of his way to find LEGAL prescription drug for unbearable pain.
Unless you had a pain that was ruining your life night and day, and unless you were suffering so much that you did what Limbaugh did, SHUT UP, you have no clue (as usual) what you are talking about and you have no right to anyone a hypocrit, because there is none bigger than you.
Until I had my operation I went thru unbearable pain. Morphine every two hours. Only a punk who can have unlimited supply of presciption drugs prescribed by a close relative refuses to understand what pain is and what people do to relieve it. And/or a total hypocrit. Or should I say liberal?
I said in post #10:
"What I'd like to see (but due to the total lack of courage of Obama, it will never happen) is a debate between Limbaugh and Obama. Any guesses who would make the other look like a total fool?"
To which SirJosephPorter replied:
"Limbaugh challenging Obama for a debate? That is like a poodle yapping, yipping at an elephant and challenging elephant for a fight. The best, most dignified thing an elephant can do is to ignore yipping poodle and continue on his way."
To which I replied (in part):
"BTW, the symbol of the Republican Party is the elephant. So, I fully agree with you, Obama would, indeed, be nothing but a yipping, yapping poodle versus Rush Limbaugh."
To which SirJosephPorter replied absolutely nothing, because his foot in his mouth got in the way.
The only thing I would have changed in his otherwise perfect analogy is that instead of a poodle I would have named the (losing) opponent of the noble elephant a typical liberal, designated by their symbol: a DONKEY.
"What I'd like to see (but due to the total lack of courage of Obama, it will never happen) is a debate between Limbaugh and Obama. Any guesses who would make the other look like a total fool?"
To which SirJosephPorter replied:
"Limbaugh challenging Obama for a debate? That is like a poodle yapping, yipping at an elephant and challenging elephant for a fight. The best, most dignified thing an elephant can do is to ignore yipping poodle and continue on his way."
To which I replied (in part):
"BTW, the symbol of the Republican Party is the elephant. So, I fully agree with you, Obama would, indeed, be nothing but a yipping, yapping poodle versus Rush Limbaugh."
To which SirJosephPorter replied absolutely nothing, because his foot in his mouth got in the way.
The only thing I would have changed in his otherwise perfect analogy is that instead of a poodle I would have named the (losing) opponent of the noble elephant a typical liberal, designated by their symbol: a DONKEY.
Last edited:
Seriously? Limbaugh a great person?
Regardless of if you agree with views he espouses, he doesn't.
He's a drug addict who talks about being tough on drugs.
Regardless of if you agree with views he espouses, he doesn't.
He's a drug addict who talks about being tough on drugs.
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"There's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995[/FONT]
Zzarchov, you either missed or ignored my post #22.
If you are a liberal it doesn't matter.
But I hope you will never have to go thru the same intolerable, excruciting pain that I went thru and I assume Limbaugh did. Unless you experience that kind of pain with no relief in sight, your quoting Limbaugh about ILLEGAL and RECREATIONAL drugs, (and NOT prrescription drugs), you are way off. Or just being a hypocrite. Not at all unusual for a liberal.
BTW, can you quote something more in the present? Lot of things can change in fourteen years. Except liberal minds all mixed up and permanently set.
If you are a liberal it doesn't matter.
But I hope you will never have to go thru the same intolerable, excruciting pain that I went thru and I assume Limbaugh did. Unless you experience that kind of pain with no relief in sight, your quoting Limbaugh about ILLEGAL and RECREATIONAL drugs, (and NOT prrescription drugs), you are way off. Or just being a hypocrite. Not at all unusual for a liberal.
BTW, can you quote something more in the present? Lot of things can change in fourteen years. Except liberal minds all mixed up and permanently set.
Im sorry, what do you think everyone else who uses illegal drugs is? Is he magically different?
No, he's not. He knows its wrong, thats why he lied about it. Limbaugh was using drugs illegally and without prescription.
Heroine, Cocaine, Morphine and Marijuana are all prescription drugs too, unless they are used illegally and for recreation, like Limbaugh.
He didn't go through anything special that millions of others hadn't, and he chose to break the law. He believed in zero tolerance and no excuses...until it was him who needed excuses.
The bigger question? Why the need to defend him? Just because someone is a douchebag, doesn't mean everything they said was wrong. But when you defend him it shows you really don't care about what he says, only a "Red team v Blue team" mentality.
You are just a liberal who likes to be self righteous. If you were truly conservative you would be the loudest to call for his imprisonment.
No one hates dirty cops like good cops. No one hates Limbaugh more than actual conservatives.
Your quote of Limbaugh is fourteen years old.
Like I said, a lot can change in fourteen years. Fourteen years ago I was a 171 average 10-pin bowler. Played shortstop in our Old Timers Slow Pitch League.
Then the pains came.
Unless you have suffered what I did, and - presumably Limbaugh did - you have no cause to call anyone a douchebag.
During the worst time of my pain I worked in the States, commuting weekly from Canada, waiting for a two hour surgery for more than two years. I contemplated getting either surgery or drugs in the States, but I just could not afford it. If I could have, I would have done everything to get enough drugs or surgery to relieve my pain.
Limbaugh did. I do not blame him from it. I blame the laws, in Canada and in the United States that make people suffer unnecessarily. And if people can afford to bypass idiotic laws, the more power to them. No worse than doing 130 kmph in a 100 kmph zone. Unless you are full of malice.
I do not defend him because he is a conservative. I defend him because I've been where he has been and I can sympathize. You haven't and all you can do is parrot sanctimonious platitudes like a typical better-than-you, holier-than-thou hypocrit.
You haven't suffered insufferable pain, obviously. And, honestly, I hope you never will.
P.S. Please DO NOT ever call me a liberal. Or politically correct.
Like I said, a lot can change in fourteen years. Fourteen years ago I was a 171 average 10-pin bowler. Played shortstop in our Old Timers Slow Pitch League.
Then the pains came.
Unless you have suffered what I did, and - presumably Limbaugh did - you have no cause to call anyone a douchebag.
During the worst time of my pain I worked in the States, commuting weekly from Canada, waiting for a two hour surgery for more than two years. I contemplated getting either surgery or drugs in the States, but I just could not afford it. If I could have, I would have done everything to get enough drugs or surgery to relieve my pain.
Limbaugh did. I do not blame him from it. I blame the laws, in Canada and in the United States that make people suffer unnecessarily. And if people can afford to bypass idiotic laws, the more power to them. No worse than doing 130 kmph in a 100 kmph zone. Unless you are full of malice.
I do not defend him because he is a conservative. I defend him because I've been where he has been and I can sympathize. You haven't and all you can do is parrot sanctimonious platitudes like a typical better-than-you, holier-than-thou hypocrit.
You haven't suffered insufferable pain, obviously. And, honestly, I hope you never will.
P.S. Please DO NOT ever call me a liberal. Or politically correct.
Your quote of Limbaugh is fourteen years old.
Unless you have suffered what I did, and - presumably Limbaugh did - you have no cause to call anyone a douchebag.
Yukon, a leopard doesn’t change its spots. Limbaugh’s vies have not changed in 14 years. If anything, they have become more extreme (almost as extreme as your own views). And ‘douchebag’ is one of the milder epithets one may use in describing Limbaugh, he is deserving of much harsher epithets.
Then the pains came.
Being in pain is not an excuse to break law (unless one is a Republican, then one doesn’t need any excuse to break the law).
Limbaugh did. I do not blame him from it. I blame the laws, in Canada and in the United States
Of course, Yukon. Law should be obeyed only until they are not an inconvenience, then one may break them with impunity (only if one is a conservative Republican, of course. Only conservative Republicans have that privilege).
I do not defend him because he is a conservative.
You most certainly defend him because he is a conservative, you are a dittohead. If Limbaugh said that sun rises in the west, you will solemnly nod your head in agreement. Tell me even one issue, even one policy where you disagree with your idol, drug addict Limbaugh. Doesn’t exist.
You haven't suffered insufferable pain, obviously. And, honestly, I hope you never will.
Again, that is not an excuse to break the law (especially since your guru has spent his entire life ranting and raving against people who use drugs. But then I doubt if you even understand the concept of hypocrisy).
Unless you have suffered what I did, and - presumably Limbaugh did - you have no cause to call anyone a douchebag.
Yukon, a leopard doesn’t change its spots. Limbaugh’s vies have not changed in 14 years. If anything, they have become more extreme (almost as extreme as your own views). And ‘douchebag’ is one of the milder epithets one may use in describing Limbaugh, he is deserving of much harsher epithets.
Then the pains came.
Being in pain is not an excuse to break law (unless one is a Republican, then one doesn’t need any excuse to break the law).
Limbaugh did. I do not blame him from it. I blame the laws, in Canada and in the United States
Of course, Yukon. Law should be obeyed only until they are not an inconvenience, then one may break them with impunity (only if one is a conservative Republican, of course. Only conservative Republicans have that privilege).
I do not defend him because he is a conservative.
You most certainly defend him because he is a conservative, you are a dittohead. If Limbaugh said that sun rises in the west, you will solemnly nod your head in agreement. Tell me even one issue, even one policy where you disagree with your idol, drug addict Limbaugh. Doesn’t exist.
You haven't suffered insufferable pain, obviously. And, honestly, I hope you never will.
Again, that is not an excuse to break the law (especially since your guru has spent his entire life ranting and raving against people who use drugs. But then I doubt if you even understand the concept of hypocrisy).
14 years? He was outed as a drug addict 6 years ago, he'd been involved drug abuse of the substance 6 years before that. So TWO YEARS After he said that he was abusing drugs.
So everyone else he advocated locking up and throwing in jail. They deserved it.
But then when it was wrong, he changed his mind. Except he didn't apologize to anyone else did he? He didn't even publically say anything until he was CAUGHT 6 years later.
Thats kind of his problem. He speaks loudly about the need to address issues he has no experience with. And the first time he has any actual experience on a matter, anything personal, his view changes 180.
Drug abuse is a failing and a crime and you deserve to be punished. Until he finds a reason to abuse drugs, then it should be whiping his hands clean.
He's a failure as a person, if extreme pain and suffering is reason to break the law..he should shut his trap and stop saying it isn't for everyone else.
and you are no Conservative.
So everyone else he advocated locking up and throwing in jail. They deserved it.
But then when it was wrong, he changed his mind. Except he didn't apologize to anyone else did he? He didn't even publically say anything until he was CAUGHT 6 years later.
Thats kind of his problem. He speaks loudly about the need to address issues he has no experience with. And the first time he has any actual experience on a matter, anything personal, his view changes 180.
Drug abuse is a failing and a crime and you deserve to be punished. Until he finds a reason to abuse drugs, then it should be whiping his hands clean.
He's a failure as a person, if extreme pain and suffering is reason to break the law..he should shut his trap and stop saying it isn't for everyone else.
and you are no Conservative.
I don't care if Limbaugh took drugs or not. If he really gave a shyte about the USA and was any good at anything besides snivelling and ranting about liberals, he'd take a stab at running it himself. He's an armchair "expert", no better than the rest of us including liberals.
SirJosephPorter, congratulations on recruiting an obliging echo chamber in the person of Zzarchov. Admirers and imitators are hard to come by, so honour him/her, you need all the help you can get.
Notice that you still haven't been able to come up with a response to my post #24.
All you managed to do is put your OTHER foot in your mouth. Your inane generalizations, over-the-top hyperboles and outright lies will surely appeal to your new stooge.
Making 300 million a year and having an audience of 20 million people a week is a failure only in the eyes of a jealous and envious welfare recipient.
Notice that you still haven't been able to come up with a response to my post #24.
All you managed to do is put your OTHER foot in your mouth. Your inane generalizations, over-the-top hyperboles and outright lies will surely appeal to your new stooge.
Making 300 million a year and having an audience of 20 million people a week is a failure only in the eyes of a jealous and envious welfare recipient.
Last edited:
I'm by no means an expert on Rush Limbaugh, was never impressed by his intelligence and every time I saw or heard him I came away with the impression he was a bit of a loser. Not sure why, just the vibes I got.
Yukon, you are the biggest hypocrite I have ever come across. Let me figure out the logic of this:
1. Person A smokes pot therefore he is a scum drug addict and should be put in jail.
2. Person B suffers from some "Pain" therefore they are justified in abusing prescription drugs which they do not have a prescription for?
Are republican-hypocrite drug addicts somehow different then your average drug user?
1. Person A smokes pot therefore he is a scum drug addict and should be put in jail.
2. Person B suffers from some "Pain" therefore they are justified in abusing prescription drugs which they do not have a prescription for?
Are republican-hypocrite drug addicts somehow different then your average drug user?
Nothing to reply with, Jack?
Is your pain getting to ya, is your mind fogged by pain killers?
"I'm by no means an expert on Rush Limbaugh, was never impressed by his intelligence and every time I saw or heard him I came away with the impression he was a bit of a loser. Not sure why, just the vibes I got."
You and SirJosephPorter and Zzarchov and DurkaDurka and the rest of the jealous, envious hypocritical losers who have no idea what the Hell they are talking about and resent the fact that Limbaugh makes more money one day than all of them combined makes in a year.
You and SirJosephPorter and Zzarchov and DurkaDurka and the rest of the jealous, envious hypocritical losers who have no idea what the Hell they are talking about and resent the fact that Limbaugh makes more money one day than all of them combined makes in a year.
So he makes a lot of money in one day. What does that prove? To me it's an indication he belongs in jail like a lot of fatcat C.E.O.s Thanks for bringing it to my attention that he's even a bigger scumbag than I thought.