I don't believe that they knew what they were voting for.You do realise the British people want Brexit, don't you?
Run another referendum and see if that's true.
I don't believe that they knew what they were voting for.You do realise the British people want Brexit, don't you?
I don't believe that they knew what they were voting for.
Run another referendum and see if that's true.
If a second referendum isn't democratic, neither was the first.What you believe doesn't matter overall in a democracy. All that matters is the result.
If a second referendum isn't democratic, neither was the first.
you are assuming what the MOTIVEThe first was democratic. Obviously.
A second referendum to try and overturn the result of the first won't be. Obviously.
Only someone of your limited intellect can think that it's entirely democratic to hold a second referendum to try and overturn the result of the first.
I agree. Much better than voting for a surrender document which isn't reallty Brexit and keeps us in the EU in all but name.
It's no wonder the DUP are opposed to it.
It doesn't need to say it in the article. It's a known fact.
The DUP, a right-wing Northern Irish Unionist party that promotes Britishness and is against gay marriage and abortion, is well-known for bring a pro-Brexit, anti-EU, party.
Yeah. The DUP - which supports and props up the Government - wants No Deal Brexit.
Remainers don't want a deal, because that would mean Brexit.
The Brexit Party won't support a deal that doesn't deliver proper Brexit.
Well in my opinion a hard Brexit will be the best case scenario for Britain . When the EU implodes the Brits won’t be left holding the bag .Yes, because to the DUP, it's screwing with North Ireland.
I asked if it was mentioned ANYWHERE, not just in the article. I thought the DUP were supporters of BoJo?
Sounds like your kind of people, so why are you against them?
Again, proof?
So basically, the only Brexit that will happen is a hard one, because that's all that's gonna be gotten? If your boy Nigel doesn't like it, then it's not gonna pass. And while a no deal might be awesome to people like you, even BoJo realized there had to be compromise... at least I give him an A for effort. It's more than I thought he'd do.
you are assuming what the MOTIVE
It might be that you are afraid of the results from a second referendum. Yet it might be a very good thing.......as the population has had time to consider more pros and cons re: the issue..........and would make more seasoned voting decdions.
So basically, the only Brexit that will happen is a hard one, because that's all that's gonna be gotten? If your boy Nigel doesn't like it, then it's not gonna pass. And while a no deal might be awesome to people like you, even BoJo realized there had to be compromise... at least I give him an A for effort. It's more than I thought he'd do.
If it's not a "hard" Brexit then it's not Brexit at all. The people voted for Brexit and that is what should be delivered.
The terms "soft Brexit" and "hard Brexit" were invented by Remainers only after they lost the referendum as a ruse to try and keep in the EU in all but name.
"Hard Brexit" is Brexit, and that's what should happen.
Personally I would think yes a hard deal is best . At present both France and Germany are in or close to recession as they are the two largest economies in the E.U. there is trouble ahead .Greece Italy and Spain are still broke .. The E.U. will implode within five years , ten at most .So... the Hard Brexit I've heard about - leaving with no deal - is ideal.
A soft Brexit - some sort of deal and concessions - is a waste of time?