Ah you get what I mean. Let's not nitpick because that is being absurd.
Yes indeed and many an 18-20 year old kids go up to Montreal from this area and get ripped up!
Your age?
1. This whole thread is about how 0.5% is nitpicking and absurd; however, you seem to be in favour of nitpicking. So no, I will not let that go. What percentage is the cutoff at? One part in a thousand? One part in a million? One part in a billion? Just how absurd are you? I am not the one nitpicking, since I say anyone should be able to drink whatever.
2. Which proves how arbitrary it is.
3. Old enough. Also, you are a bigot. I would use more colourful language, but at the very least this insult is completely justified: you are a bigot.
How’s this? Every 22 minutes someone dies in an alcohol-related motor vehicle accident. And perhaps, most horrible of all a disproportionately high number of those deaths and accidents come in the 15 to 24 age group. A lot of young people are, in fact, dying before they get old …dying tragic, meaningless deaths.
Teenage Drunk Driving
Yes the drinking laws are pretty much arbitrary, even in the U.S., but when exactly would be the appropriate age to allow your child to drink?
Well, by your argument it should be the driving which they cannot do until they are 21. Not the drinking. Since more teens die from driving without being drunk than from drinking too much without driving.
Moreover, driving they might kill somebody else! So by instituting a driving age which is lower than the drinking age you are saying that they are responsible enough to take somebody else's life into their own hands, but not their own. This doesn't make any sense. Shouldn't one be mature enough to danger one's own life before being mature enough to endanger other people?
People should be allowed to drink the minute they want to. This isn't a criminal matter. The police should not be playing the role of parents.