Time To End Aid To Africa

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
I saw the Zambian economist Dambisa MoyoI on the CBC and she says that African leaders are not beholden to their voting publics because Western countries supply them with money so they can fend off public demands. Africa has so many coups because groups try to capture gov't which have access to pools of capital. They are simply going where the money is, unfortunately it is violent. I say cut aid by 90% to Africa over 3 years. Sure people will die, Africans will die anyway no matter what we do or not do. The current system gives them no chance at all. I wouldn't visit let alone invest in Africa.


Is trade, not aid, the answer for Africa? | Business | guardian.co.uk

Is trade, not aid, the answer for Africa?

Donors are now focusing less on charity and more on the continent's small entrepreneurs


After years when billions have been spent on aid projects in Africa, donors are now picking up on a new trend to put money on the continent's entrepreneurs. Next month, a meeting of the World Economic Forum on Africa in Cape Town is set to reinforce the message that "trade not aid'' represents salvation for a continent whose average 5% growth in the past five years is projected to fall to 1.5% this year amid the global economic downturn.


Now entrepreneurship is being presented as a panacea. Earlier this month, the Africa Commission, an initiative by the Danish government, launched a "guarantee facility" worth $3bn to mobilize loans for small businesses. Until now, such entrepreneurs – typically street vendors wishing to own a shop but with needs exceeding the scope of micro-credit – have been ignored by local banks. Donald Kaberuka, a commission member and president of the African Development Bank, said the move was "the most innovative initiative launched in Africa in decades, which will create millions of productive and decent jobs".


A bestselling book by the Zambian economist Dambisa Moyo called Dead Aid argues that western assistance has given rise to a dependency culture in developing countries. It has sparked a furious response from aid organisations angered by the attention given to the former Goldman Sachs strategist, named this month by Time Magazine as one of the top 100 most influential people in the world.


But the question is: what should aid be replaced by? Aid experts, businesspeople and civil society groups warn that unless the new social entrepreneurs, as they are being called, must be helped not only to get on their bikes but to stay on them.


The world financial crisis has increased protectionist tendencies among rich countries, worsening Africa's access to markets. The crisis has set back efforts such as Gordon Brown's Business Call to Action, which last year asked corporations to help to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals by 2015.


It is estimated that 60% of Africa's population is aged under 25. Only one in four children go into secondary education and, of those, only 5% enter vocational training courses. Business studies are mostly absent from curriculums and apprenticeships often mask child exploitation.
African business people welcome the Africa Commission's move. But Sudanese-British entrepreneur Mo Ibrahim – who made his fortune in Africa through the Celtel mobile phone company – said supporting small business was only part of the solution. Ibrahim, 63, said: "Africa has no venture capital industry – the kind that supported the Googles and Microsofts of this world. So the guarantee facility is helpful, but what we really need are local funds to become involved. We need local investors whose motivation is profit. The Africa Commission must not become another handout industry."


He also welcomed the move to raise the glass ceiling of micro-credit, but said African governments must not be let off the hook. "The World Bank should refuse to fund any project which is not regional. African governments must be pressed to regionalise their economies and stop being 53 little countries, each with their flag, jealously watching each other."


Microsoft Africa chairman Cheick Diarra, 57, warned that encouraging entrepreneurs will build wealth only if bureaucratic obstacles are removed. "Politicians are doing very little to dynamise their economies or empower their people. Governments should be dealing with infrastructure development, such as electrification."


Diarra, from Mali, who made his name as an interplanetary navigator for Nasa, also believes "bad aid" is responsible for many of the continent's ills. "In 2002, I ran the Virtual University in Nairobi, providing distance-learning by internet. But dealings with most of the donors were a frustration because they set rigid terms and would rarely adapt to the rapidly-changing conditions on the ground."


African business development does not represent a threat to rich countries. The continent has 20% of the world's population but only a 2% share of its trade. Nevertheless, even before decolonisation in the 1960s, rich countries have behaved as though they wished to keep Africa poor. The one exception to the rule is Coca-Cola, which since 1928 has been fostering entrepreneurship on the continent.


Critics of the Africa Commission say its focus on entrepreneurs implies that it will help urban businesses, but that 65% of Africa's people are rural. Danish development minister Ulla Tornaes said farmers need to become businesslike and added: "We cannot dictate to African countries on agriculture."
In African civil society – where western-funded lobby groups and welfare organizations have had sharp budget cuts as a result of the downturn – there are fears that the focus on entrepreneurship is a creeping privatisation of aid. Vuyiseka Dabula, spokesman for the South African Treatment Action Campaign, said: "HIV is not in recession and we are not a business. About 80% of our funding comes from international donors and most of them have had 25% budget cuts."


Oxfam's head of research, Duncan Green, said the move to promote entrepreneurship smacked of repackaging. "Suddenly people are saying that social entrepreneurship is going to get millions of people on to solar energy and that kind of thing. It's interesting, but it must not be seen as the new magic bullet."
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
This is a fantastically great story. Imagine, releasing our colonial mentality on the dark continent. Prodding their notoriously gov'ts to look for public support. I read a while back Western gov'ts give money to African gov'ts and just walk away, not worrying at all about accountability for taxpayer funds. This causes war and death, and its our fault, when we think we do gooders.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
I think China has the right idea toward Africa where they invest and build infrastructure.

It seems aid has too many strings attached and is meant to profit us not Africans.

For example Bill Gates has given millions in aid to Africa but on closer inspection it was only to prop up copyright and patent law to prevent laws allowing knock off pharmaceuticals which in turn would have undermined his strangle hold on the software market.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,694
11,562
113
Low Earth Orbit
A few years back a drug company that makes AIDS potions contaminated a batch of meds and sales were halted in the West...but not to Africa and Asia. it was dumped at a discount.

AIDS has been created for population contol. PERIOD
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
The time to end anything and everything to aid, help or support Africa was when the last colonial powers handed the power ower to Africans.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,694
11,562
113
Low Earth Orbit
Nigeria has the highest percentage of happy people followed by Mexico, Venezuela, El Salvador and Puerto Rico....

Maybe they don't want the aid and fight consumerism and being a slave to a factory or any other 8hr a day dictatorship and a life time of debt.?

Canada is 17th. I guess we are still poor enough to be happy.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
The happy people in Nigeria are those who managed to con gullible North American with their scams to the tune of billions of dollars.

Work? NO! Scam YES!!

No wonder they are happy. Please quote statistics about their literacy.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
Now petros, you are being annoying. People here do not want the truth. They feel uncomfortable with any other illusion than they are number one.
Funny how they pride themselves as having freedom.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
Canada is number ten!!!!

Well now, it's time for the government to screw us around some more; like they did after we were rated the best country in the world to live in.

Canadians wouldn't start to complain until we got to 60 or lower.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,694
11,562
113
Low Earth Orbit
The happy people in Nigeria are those who managed to con gullible North American with their scams to the tune of billions of dollars.

Work? NO! Scam YES!!

No wonder they are happy. Please quote statistics about their literacy.
Your idea of happiness is consumerism.

The rest of the data says:


Consumerism
Researchers believe the unchanging trend is linked to consumerism.
"New Zealand ranked 15 for overall satisfaction, the US 16th, Australia 20th and Britain 24th - although Australia beats the other three for day-to-day happiness," New Scientist says.
The survey is a worldwide investigation of socio-cultural and political change conducted about every four years by an international network of social scientists.
It includes questions about how happy people are and how satisfied they are with their lives. Although such surveys are not new, they are being increasingly taken into account by policy makers.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
Anyone who choose to be represented by an upside down baby with a moustache is an idiot in my book.

His/her comments prove that I am right.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,694
11,562
113
Low Earth Orbit
She what I mean about needing to be intelligent to make the list.

Figure this out.... if you see Kay off to the moon Canada would have been 16th
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
This is a fantastically great story. Imagine, releasing our colonial mentality on the dark continent. Prodding their notoriously gov'ts to look for public support. I read a while back Western gov'ts give money to African gov'ts and just walk away, not worrying at all about accountability for taxpayer funds. This causes war and death, and its our fault, when we think we do gooders.

You will find that do gooders rarely are. They just think of themselves as such. Mostly they create more problems than they cure.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
You will find that do gooders rarely are. They just think of themselves as such. Mostly they create more problems than they cure.

For one thing this woman is an an economist, that's not a do gooder. She simply wants a new model for African development. The place is a wreck, like she says, how much worse can it get? A little hard nosed but relatively fair capitalism would do the place a world of good. This could then help foster democracy and a virtuous circle could be created.

And Africa has problems. In one article I read where women were taking advantage of microloans and succeeding. Then it stopped because a man said, "Women in our culture don't have money." So traditionalism hinders progress and what can we do about that? It is an issue for Africans to deal with.
 

johnnyhangover

now with added fiber!
Feb 20, 2009
132
4
18
in my house
www.dreadfulmonkey.com
Foreign aid in the form of food undermines local production, while foreign aid in the form of cash has the potential to be swallowed up by dishonest gov'ts. Not that all gov'ts in Africa are corrupt, but this is an argument set forth by smarter economists than me (Krugman for example). Economically, free trade is the only proven method for pulling countries out of poverty (see most of Asia). Even then, income distribution becomes the problem. Those industries with comparative advantage show rising income while other industries stagnate.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Surely I can't be the only one who's noticed this general pattern: birth rates are highest, incomes are lowest, political and economic freedoms are lowest, civil rights are least available, education is poorest... well pick whatever indicator you like, odds are it will have its worst values in places where the status of women is lowest. I cannot believe that's a coincidence.