Scientists, keep up moving my posting.
any theory presented without hard evidence (or even a reference) goes to alternate theories. Perhaps you'd like to submit your theory to "science" or "scientific american", and see if they're nicer about it
Scientists, keep up moving my posting.
Actually, I think you are being overly generous in tagging eannasirs ideas as "theories".any theory presented without hard evidence (or even a reference) goes to alternate theories. Perhaps you'd like to submit your theory to "science" or "scientific american", and see if they're nicer about it
Back for more abuse, eh.
I have no idea what you are talking about so I don't have an opinion. I don't believe in the validity of any of the so called holy books so it all seems rather silly to me. I was referring to Dexter coming in (right on cue Dex!) and making hamburger out of your beliefs.Which of the 4 points that I said, that you deny?
Name a place on this planet that doesn't have life? No matter how far we poke into the rock or how deep the ocean or how deep the ice we have found life in ABUNDANCE.neither were they ever inhabited. But since divine authority means everything and evidence means nothing to you, I don't expect you'll believe that.
True, but hardly to the point, eanassir believes Mercury and Venus were once inhabited by humans. Funny how he can believe that the trees burned there, but the towns, houses, clubs, shops, and furniture survived. They must all have been made of rock. I'm getting a vision of a Bedrock-type village, Fred, Wilma, Barney, Betty, et al, fried to a crisp in their yards, leaving a ghost town of stone buildings...
#3 is not the correct explanation.
Also, neither Mercury nor Venus have stopped their axial rotation,
and neither were they ever inhabited.
Is it possible to enhance the mind with technology?
Is it possible to transfer the mind into a computer of some sort?
Are we not machines made matter and energy, that empower the mind experience TRUTH?
You're utterly hopeless eanassir. The link you provided about Mercury in that post clearly and succinctly states otherwise. From the site: " It is now known that Mercury rotates three times in two of its years."It is time now to see Mercury in another view point
... Mercury stopped since long time ago.
You're utterly hopeless eanassir. The link you provided about Mercury in that post clearly and succinctly states otherwise. From the site: " It is now known that Mercury rotates three times in two of its years."
Do you not read the material at the links you post, or do you just ignore the facts that are inconsistent with your silly thesis?