any theory presented without hard evidence (or even a reference) goes to alternate theories. Perhaps you'd like to submit your theory to "science" or "scientific american", and see if they're nicer about it
The Doomed Mercury
- Thread starter eanassir
- Start date
any theory presented without hard evidence (or even a reference) goes to alternate theories. Perhaps you'd like to submit your theory to "science" or "scientific american", and see if they're nicer about it
The mountains, on both Venus and Mercury, started to be seared by the heat of the sun in the side facing the sun, then the calcium carbonate and other compounds in the rocks started to liberate CO2 and some other gases by the heat effect of the sun, and the rocks of the mountains became like dust which later was swept by the wind to the valleys making all the area somewhat a flattened land.
Calcium carbonate → Calcium Oxide + CO2
Most of the rocks of mountains include this calcium carbonate, then after heating it will be converted into calcium oxide which is a white powder, and CO2 will be liberated.
http://universeandquran.t35.com/new_page_4.htm#Mountains_Will_Be_Dispersed
http://universeandquran.t35.com/new_page_4.htm#Mountains_Will_Be_Dispersed
This has occurred to some extent on Venus, but had occurred prominently on Mercury because it had stopped a long time before Venus.
God - be celebrated His praise - said in the Quran 73: 14
يَوْمَ تَرْجُفُ الْأَرْضُ وَالْجِبَالُ وَكَانَتِ الْجِبَالُ كَثِيبًا مَّهِيلًا
The explanation: (And on the day when the earth and the mountains shall quake, and priorily the mountains shall become a heaping mass of sand.)
It means: like sand-hills in which the sand easily sweeps away of their sides with the least movement, and the wind carries it away to the low lands.
Another point indicating the coldness of both Venus and Mercury: is the absence of active volcanoes which are not existent on Mercury and Venus, but are active on both the Earth and Mars. Earth and Mars are continuously spinning around their axes and had liquid and hot cores.
Last edited:
Actually, I think you are being overly generous in tagging eannasirs ideas as "theories".
From Princeton University Press: "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world" is the definition of "theory".
From NASA:"An explanation for some phenomenon that is based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning."
Eanassir's postings contain no substantiation at all. Hearsay is not acceptable as substantiation. His ideas are not based on experimentation and indeed, I highly doubt they have much to do with reasoning.
Last edited:
The spacecraft MESSENGER have taken its orbit around Mercury and started sending its pictures of the doomed planet.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/b...orbit-2011-03-29&WT.mc_id=SA_CAT_SPC_20110331
http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/inline/blog/Image/first-mercury-image.jpg
Which confirm the explanation of the late interpreter of the Quran and the Bible:
1- No atmosphere and the surface appears clearly.
2- The surface of Mercury is full of a large number of craters --- because of the falling of a large number of comets on it.
3- There are many fissures and trenches and grooves because Mercury cooled down and so contracted and its surface had such grooves and fissures because of the contraction and shrinkage.
4- No water is now on Mercury: all of its water and atmosphere escaped to the outer space following the weakness of its gravity.
If the images are precise like that of Google-earth then we may see the river beds empty and the sea bottoms scorched by the sun- heat, and the houses without people after all its people had perished.
The findings now on Mercury are like those of Venus and in fact more severe; because Mercury had stopped its axial spinning a long time before did Venus; therefore:
"[Mercury and] Venus, in the past, was inhabited; for there were human beings, animals, plant, trees and other things; but the life on [Mercury and] Venus ended because of its standstill from axial rotation, and all its inhabitants died, its rivers dried and its trees burnt;
therefore, whosoever was on the day-side died from excessive heat and thirst, and whosoever was on the night-side died from excessive coldness and starvation.
If anyone goes to [Mercury or] Venus and lands on the day-side, he will die from excessive heat; and if he lands on the night-side, he will suffer there from severe coldness and lack of food.
The traveler to [Mercury or] Venus, then, will find towns, houses, clubs and shops, but will not see anyone dwelling therein; he will see furniture and property, but will not see any owner of them; he will see rivers but without water; and trees but they have been burnt by the Sun heat."
http://www.scientificamerican.com/b...orbit-2011-03-29&WT.mc_id=SA_CAT_SPC_20110331
http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/inline/blog/Image/first-mercury-image.jpg
Which confirm the explanation of the late interpreter of the Quran and the Bible:
1- No atmosphere and the surface appears clearly.
2- The surface of Mercury is full of a large number of craters --- because of the falling of a large number of comets on it.
3- There are many fissures and trenches and grooves because Mercury cooled down and so contracted and its surface had such grooves and fissures because of the contraction and shrinkage.
4- No water is now on Mercury: all of its water and atmosphere escaped to the outer space following the weakness of its gravity.
If the images are precise like that of Google-earth then we may see the river beds empty and the sea bottoms scorched by the sun- heat, and the houses without people after all its people had perished.
The findings now on Mercury are like those of Venus and in fact more severe; because Mercury had stopped its axial spinning a long time before did Venus; therefore:
"[Mercury and] Venus, in the past, was inhabited; for there were human beings, animals, plant, trees and other things; but the life on [Mercury and] Venus ended because of its standstill from axial rotation, and all its inhabitants died, its rivers dried and its trees burnt;
therefore, whosoever was on the day-side died from excessive heat and thirst, and whosoever was on the night-side died from excessive coldness and starvation.
If anyone goes to [Mercury or] Venus and lands on the day-side, he will die from excessive heat; and if he lands on the night-side, he will suffer there from severe coldness and lack of food.
The traveler to [Mercury or] Venus, then, will find towns, houses, clubs and shops, but will not see anyone dwelling therein; he will see furniture and property, but will not see any owner of them; he will see rivers but without water; and trees but they have been burnt by the Sun heat."
Last edited:
#3 is not the correct explanation. Also, neither Mercury nor Venus have stopped their axial rotation, and neither were they ever inhabited. But since divine authority means everything and evidence means nothing to you, I don't expect you'll believe that.
I have no idea what you are talking about so I don't have an opinion. I don't believe in the validity of any of the so called holy books so it all seems rather silly to me. I was referring to Dexter coming in (right on cue Dex!) and making hamburger out of your beliefs.
Name a place on this planet that doesn't have life? No matter how far we poke into the rock or how deep the ocean or how deep the ice we have found life in ABUNDANCE.
True, but hardly to the point, eanassir believes Mercury and Venus were once inhabited by humans. Funny how he can believe that the trees burned there, but the towns, houses, clubs, shops, and furniture survived. They must all have been made of rock. I'm getting a vision of a Bedrock-type village, Fred, Wilma, Barney, Betty, et al, fried to a crisp in their yards, leaving a ghost town of stone buildings...
This is what really happens to Mormons. Instead of being whisked away to be gods on other planets their spirits are absorbed by the Great Salt Lake where they are doomed live in the after life as artemia salina building castles in fish bowls while Christian families observe as gods in their own right?
#3 The fissures, grooves and huge trenches that appear on the surface of Mercury, Moon and Earth are certainly due to the cooling of these subjects which contracted to varying degrees. Certainly, these objects are cooler than they were in the past.
It is easier to watch Mercury: now you see Mercury and see many features on its surface like the Debussy Crater, one of the most prominent features on Mercury; therefore when you see it become in the dark night of Mercury -- then tell me.
How can you scientifically insist on this? While they only try hard to find the truth about Mercury, and you come and insist there was no life on either of Mercury and Venus ?
So any hoot, will we survive this event and HOW?
Why do the planets have axial rotation at all?
Can anyone explain gravity?
What is the cause of time dilation?
Will the Great Salt Lake Mormons be aware of their Christian God families? and will the Christian parents let their children play with the Mormons unattended?
And did the Flint Stone's automatic dishwasher survive, considering that it is merely an appliance?
And honestly, is it reasonable to conclude that neither Mercury or Venus were ever inhabited?
I think NOT..
Why do the planets have axial rotation at all?
Can anyone explain gravity?
What is the cause of time dilation?
Will the Great Salt Lake Mormons be aware of their Christian God families? and will the Christian parents let their children play with the Mormons unattended?
And did the Flint Stone's automatic dishwasher survive, considering that it is merely an appliance?
And honestly, is it reasonable to conclude that neither Mercury or Venus were ever inhabited?
I think NOT..
Last edited:
It is time now to see Mercury in another view point
Better they should not stick to their rigid opinions and explanations of the strange findings they see about Mercury.
Mercury
Therefore, they observed the strange movement of Mercury: its year, its day, its orbit --> but were wrong in their explanation: because they are unaware of the fact that Mercury has stopped its axial rotation: keeping the same face towards the sun, and its core became colder by time and the planets shrank; its gravity about lost or weakened, and its atmosphere is lost into the outer space.
And now Venus is following in its footsteps, and the turn will be for Earth to become like Venus in the future.
Mercury stopped since long time ago.
Venus stopped.
Then Earth will stop 1000 years after the stopping of Venus from its axial rotation.
The standstill of the earth
Better they should not stick to their rigid opinions and explanations of the strange findings they see about Mercury.
Mercury
- "Since it is closer to the Sun than the Earth, the illumination of Mercury's disk varies when viewed with a telescope from our perspective."
- The contraction and shrinkage of the surface of Mercury:
- "Temperature variations on Mercury are the most extreme in the solar system ranging from 90 K to 700 K."
- "The temperature on Venus is slightly hotter but very stable."
Therefore, they observed the strange movement of Mercury: its year, its day, its orbit --> but were wrong in their explanation: because they are unaware of the fact that Mercury has stopped its axial rotation: keeping the same face towards the sun, and its core became colder by time and the planets shrank; its gravity about lost or weakened, and its atmosphere is lost into the outer space.
And now Venus is following in its footsteps, and the turn will be for Earth to become like Venus in the future.
Mercury stopped since long time ago.
Venus stopped.
Then Earth will stop 1000 years after the stopping of Venus from its axial rotation.
The standstill of the earth
Ask yourself why don't you consider the subject and see it is a reasonable idea?
Because your talking about things that you simply have no way of KNOWING if they are TRUE or NOT...
It is "reasonable" to consider ONLY what is KNOWN, and not take part in idle specutlation about things you simply don't know..
It is reasoning to decern what is KNOWN from what is UNKNOWN..
You do not need to say anything crazy or presumptuous to be persecuted..
That is just stupid, and you deserve what you get..
All you have to do is state the actual plain and simple observable facts of life, and people freak out and call you every name in the book.. It's really quite remarkable.
re_mark_able
The difference between the religious and the none believers is this..
The religious are dogmatic and think they have all the answers..
The none believes are nihilists and think that answers are impossible, and that they can just choose to believe whatever the F*** they want..
It's like this..
Galileo was an astronomer and mathematician, born in Pisa, Italy. He entered Pisa University as a medical student in 1581, and became professor of mathematics at Padua (1592--1610), where he improved the refracting telescope (1610), and was the first to use it for astronomy.
His bold advocacy of the Copernican theory brought severe ecclesiastical censure. He was forced to retract before the Inquisition, and was sentenced to indefinite imprisonment - though the sentence was commuted by the pope, at the request of the Duke of Tuscany. Under house arrest in Florence, he continued his research, though by 1637 he had become totally blind.
Among his other discoveries were the law of uniformly accelerated motion towards the Earth, the parabolic path of projectiles, and the law that all bodies have weight.
His work was finally removed from the Inquisiton's banned book list in 1954. The validity of his scientific work was formally recognized by the Roman Catholic Church in 1993.
Things haven't changed....
It is "reasonable" to consider ONLY what is KNOWN, and not take part in idle specutlation about things you simply don't know..
It is reasoning to decern what is KNOWN from what is UNKNOWN..
You do not need to say anything crazy or presumptuous to be persecuted..
That is just stupid, and you deserve what you get..
All you have to do is state the actual plain and simple observable facts of life, and people freak out and call you every name in the book.. It's really quite remarkable.
re_mark_able
The difference between the religious and the none believers is this..
The religious are dogmatic and think they have all the answers..
The none believes are nihilists and think that answers are impossible, and that they can just choose to believe whatever the F*** they want..
It's like this..
Galileo was an astronomer and mathematician, born in Pisa, Italy. He entered Pisa University as a medical student in 1581, and became professor of mathematics at Padua (1592--1610), where he improved the refracting telescope (1610), and was the first to use it for astronomy.
His bold advocacy of the Copernican theory brought severe ecclesiastical censure. He was forced to retract before the Inquisition, and was sentenced to indefinite imprisonment - though the sentence was commuted by the pope, at the request of the Duke of Tuscany. Under house arrest in Florence, he continued his research, though by 1637 he had become totally blind.
Among his other discoveries were the law of uniformly accelerated motion towards the Earth, the parabolic path of projectiles, and the law that all bodies have weight.
His work was finally removed from the Inquisiton's banned book list in 1954. The validity of his scientific work was formally recognized by the Roman Catholic Church in 1993.
Things haven't changed....
Last edited:
You're utterly hopeless eanassir. The link you provided about Mercury in that post clearly and succinctly states otherwise. From the site: " It is now known that Mercury rotates three times in two of its years."
Do you not read the material at the links you post, or do you just ignore the facts that are inconsistent with your silly thesis?