You might also explain how it is that the earth's current surface area is about 510 million square km, so you're claiming it was about zero 200 million years ago.
Preview Post is your friend, try to be more careful, it'd help people make sense of what you write. Four errors in nine words is extreme even for you.
Karma doesn't exist does it.
I can comment on a number of earth science topics, if you have not taken up my offers in the past why would the future be any different. When the one my post is sent to is a troll they get the draft copy. Care to explain how I got that wrong also?
The typo I saw was when I 'tyhpw' with my feet up, another things that is for trolls only.
Quote: Originally Posted by
MHz
I clam the earth has increases it's surface are by about 510 million square kilometers in the last 200M years.
Please show how the map that supports that is bogus and your untold version is more accurate.
You clam that it's increases it's surface are?
Here is where it is more useful to look at what you use as the 'question dodging tactic' rather than just answer the question. This part of my post is not important enough for you to make a reply so the part you left out entirely is the reason for the post. It was to show you weren't silenced for good by the part about who you were 'flagging down' so they could pay attention to my posts rather than the topic of the thread was the important part. I don't need to know, it show that being open is a one-way street so why would I care one way or the other what you think anymore. I'll just post along the line that this reply is going to take.
One change, move the important parts to the top and the least important to the bottom of the pile.
Doesn't help your credibility, especially when it's clear that you CAN write well when you try.
It wasn't mine that took a tumble, it was yours. My illness goes away when I sit up straight, your's will never go away. You should be interested in hearing about what else you have wrong. Got a topic for the in-laws for X-mas dinner yet, I'll play 'the visitor'.
I commented on quite a few vids that were produced by Rabbis and it took me a lot longer to type it out than it did to know what should be typed. Bones has a link.
But, no, you're still not getting it.
I got that you have troll tendencies as far back as when your historical version was wrong, no matter how finely it was detailed. Not many people have explained it any better, they are a lot smarter than than an American Evangelican Christian or RCC member.
Wrong is wrong, claiming to be 'God's people' and act like you are taking part in the exodus wars is not what the book promotes. That is what Merchants do rather than Priests.
Back when this topic first surfaced I referenced the series, 'How the Earth was made.' as representing what Science currently promoted. That was as far as the discussion was allowed to go die to your doing some troll move that was alsi a sigb the pack attack should take place to put the 'outsider in their place'.
The expanding earth claim is contrary to accepted geological science, so it's not my problem to prove you wrong.
What makes you think that made it mine? I watched the 12 hours made by the Scientist that was promoting the theory, like all things I agree with some parts and have reservations about the mechanics being promoted.
How many theories need to be proved before they can be talked about?
You're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof is on you to show that you're right and conventional geology is wrong, using the normal standards of scientific evidence and argument.
For what part, you passed on all 10 parts in that series. You are passing on saying anything of any substance in this one. Pete jumped to you aid the last time too, you two belong to the same club??
A YouTube video produced by a cartoonist, which is one of the things you or one of your fellow travellers once linked to in support of this claim, isn't it, and neither is the map, it's not enough by itself to make the case.
Easy to understand, Right? That is all it was meant to do. The series is there anytime you want to start the topic. I find trolls don't, Pete doesn't because he is a liar.
Look for the links, a Scientist at your pay-scale should be able to find them.
At the very least, you need to provide a plausible mechanism, and explanations of how it has (or has not) affected the mass of the earth and the gravitational acceleration vector at the surface.
Which post did I cover the last 4B years, back when some parts of the crust existed as shown by science today? There are a few snowball periods as well as the moon being much closer and a full day was much shorter. Either the core changed speed or time on the crust was faster because the planet was smaller. You want me to prove all of that before I even speculate. If there was a vid I would just link to it, in this case I have to get you to sit and listen or talk about this topic. Random like this works as it is you that is exposing themselves. The more I know about you the better my replies should be, for better or worse thingy.
Bad karma is a tap on the shoulder, . . . . either that or I'm practicing science fiction-writing. Told you the worst was last.