Security Council accepts No Fly Zone

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I guess it might, if we had the details.

The rebels chased assorted Canadian rig hands off their rigs at gun point and burned the rigs. It was in the news, and mentioned in the threads on Libya, assorted times at the outset of the rebellion.
 

Johnny Utah

Council Member
Mar 11, 2006
1,434
1
38
Great now let's see the United Nations enforce it..

One issue of enforcing it is Libya's sam sites and the best possible way to deal with them is using Predator strike drones..
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
If we are destined to fight in/over Libya with the U.N., we have to be best pals. We should have just left the solution to Great Briton, France and the Arab League. Lets just hope the fighting ends quickly.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
54
Oshawa
If we are destined to fight in/over Libya with the U.N., we have to be best pals. We should have just left the solution to Great Briton, France and the Arab League. Lets just hope the fighting ends quickly.

No one should have gotten involved except maybe the Arab league.

You do know why the West was bound to get involved right.

It's not rocket science, it's almost always why they get involved.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
No one should have gotten involved except maybe the Arab league.

You do know why the West was bound to get involved right.

It's not rocket science, it's almost always why they get involved.
Of course Europe wants its oil, and we do not want them getting it from our sources.
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
A no fly zone would have been more useful for the rebels soon after the conflict started. Instead the UN waited until government forces crushed rebel opposition. The timing only makes sense if the intent is invasion/occupation. It wouldn't surprise me to find out NATO already has elite ground forces in Libya for recon and to coordinate the bombing.

Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained with stupidity. We're talking about the United Nations here. Timing isn't their strong suit.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
No one should have gotten involved except maybe the Arab league.

You do know why the West was bound to get involved right.

It's not rocket science, it's almost always why they get involved.

The west was involved the minute Libya let them invest in their oil exploration and ship people over there to work. With the profit comes the entanglement.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
I notice Kadaffy got his bombing done and then he declared a cease fire. I wonder if the rebels
were provided with a few stingers.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
54
Oshawa
Of course Europe wants its oil, and we do not want them getting it from our sources.

You need it because you use too much of it......people die for it....it costs you billions in offense for it....it's sucking you dry.

You give more money in oil subsidies than you do in R&D for alternative energy.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
You need it because you use too much of it......people die for it....it costs you billions in offense for it....it's sucking you dry.

You give more money in oil subsidies than you do in R&D for alternative energy.

When the profitability fades away, they'll move on to the alternative energy. Right now though the tax payers absorb so much of the cost via 'defense' budgets that it has yet to eat into the profitability for the oil companies. One day that defense budget will dry up though. It'll mean a major shift in the global structure... scary to think.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
54
Oshawa
When the profitability fades away, they'll move on to the alternative energy. Right now though the tax payers absorb so much of the cost via 'defense' budgets that it has yet to eat into the profitability for the oil companies. One day that defense budget will dry up though. It'll mean a major shift in the global structure... scary to think.


This could have been dealt with over thirty years ago....instead here we are, fighting for a dirty energy.

Next up, water.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
...Really? The news so far has been that Britain and France will take the lead on this, the U.S. role will be logistical.

"...will take the lead...? That doesn't mean anything.

The war against Serbia showed that there was only one air force in NATO capable of doing the heavy lifting. This operation has no end game. It will go on and on whether America provides only logistics or puts bombs on target. This operation will be a bleeding wound for Prince Hamlet, America's beloved leader.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
54
Oshawa
"...will take the lead...? That doesn't mean anything.

The war against Serbia showed that there was only one air force in NATO capable of doing the heavy lifting. This operation has no end game. It will go on and on whether America provides only logistics or puts bombs on target. This operation will be a bleeding wound for Prince Hamlet, America's beloved leader.

Man...are you ever funny.