Muslim truck drivers refuse to deliver beer, win $240,000 lawsuit

[Blackleaf]

It ain't 1939, Blackleaf.

And for that we can be eternally grateful, what with your and Cannuck's ridiculous mob running Britain today.

Whilst Nazi Germany goes on the rampage around the continent David Cameron would merely send a badly-worded letter to the German ambassador and threaten that if Mr Hitler didn't start behaving himself he'd ensure that Germany's football team were kicked out of Euro1940.

Meanwhile, the ridiculous Jeremy Corbyn would tell us, as Hitler's hordes march into Poland, that we musn't go to war because war is bad and horrible and nasty and lots of people get killed in it. His Labour party would vote against war - because war is bad and is never necessary.... and, of course, it may damage the environment and contribute even more to global warming. Not to mention being dangerous.

After Germany invades Poland, Mr Cameron would finally decide to send some troops on the continent to try and stop Hitler's vast army of countless millions of soldiers - by sending 500 "peacekeepers" wearing hi-viz jackets and armed with water pistols.... but they must all be in their beds by 9pm.

As we can see, we can thank god that it isn't 1939 right now because, with your lot in power, we'd never stop the Nazi hordes. Thank God Britain wasn't run by a Left-wing elite in 1939.

 

[Jinentonix]

I'm not worried. I'm looking forward to Islamic Britainistan.

It'll be so much more pleasant and reliable than the current mess.

Do you feel the same way about the US? Going to enjoy the Islamafication of the US are you? You already have panzy judges making excuses for their deplorable behavior. 2 years ago some guy was physically assaulted by a muslim mutt for wearing a zombie mohammed costume for Hallowe'en.(His buddy was zombie Jesus who was left untouched).


The stupid twat judge hearing the case actually made excuses for the muslim mutt's deplorable behavior and cleared him of all charges. Don't sell a wedding cake to a gay couple because of your Christian beliefs and watch the SJWs fly into a rage about it. Refuse marriage licences to gay couples because of your Christian beliefs and you go to jail. Refuse service to someone with a service dog because of your idiotic muslim beliefs, and the SJWs are out in force again defending the loser's actions under the guise of "pick 'n' choose" religious tolerance.
Assault someone because they offended your muslim beliefs and you get a free pass.


It wouldn't be so bad if the left-wing idiots actually showed some consistency with their ideology. In Canada for example, how does one justify claiming to be all for Native rights, while at the same time continuing to support the importation of hundreds of thousands of people every year to land that was, as the SJWs like to complain, "stolen from the Natives"?

 

[Cannuck]

We aren't talking about pick and choosing religious teachings, here...

Well, I am. You're talking about whatever you think can deflect attention away from your silly logic. Please continue, it's entertaining to say the least.

 

[damngrumpy]

Questions for hiring should be observed by human relations departments.
This is partly their fault and the fault of governments in the context to labor
laws.
If someone does not want to do their job engaging in a legal enterprise they
don't want the job whether delivering booze, being home Friday before sun
down and a thousand other reasons they should not have the job or a lawsuit.

We have a society and in it are many different groups of competing interests..
Religion should play no place in the work place period regardless of belief
systems You have a right to apply for a job not the right to a job if you don't do
the job end of story

 

[EagleSmack]

Religion should play no place in the work place period regardless of belief
systems

There goes your Tolerance Award.

 

[taxslave]

Nah, it all really went in the toilet when Britain became a crowd of lager louts staggering from the pub to the stadium to shout racist slogans at the football match, then out to slobber all over their ballot cards whilst voting for BNP-Lite, then back to the pub for more lager, capped off by beating up an innocent non-white and passing out in the gutter covered in puke and filth.

In other words, Blackleaf's typical weekend. And week.

It wasn't even really football. Just soccer.

 

[Machjo]

And yet they have no problem selling alcohol in their Paki shops.

Er, you are aware aren't you that some Pakistanis profess the Christian Faith?

 

[Cannuck]

Please don't confuse him

 

[Machjo]

We have a society and in it are many different groups of competing interests..
Religion should play no place in the work place period regardless of belief
systems

Really. In the Netherlands where sex work is legal, a person does not lose access to social assistance programs for refusing sex work.

This leaves the question of where we draw the line. What if a person on social assistance should turn down a job selling lottery tickets because he does not want to participate in the exploitation of gambling addicts? We could extend that to alcohol, legal drugs, and presumably even animal products and byproducts out of compassion for animals.

To the opposite extreme we have those who, though always operating legally, have no qualms about always pushing the limits of the law and exploiting every loophole available and every and any weakness in their customers for a dollar, the consequences to their customers and society be damned.

Where exactly along that spectrum of extremes do we allow a person to refuse sex work, selling lottery tickets, alcohol, legal drugs or meat out of a teligious concern for his fellow man or animals without being denied social assistance? And on what rationale do we draw that line?