I don't know Talloola. Ignatief and Iginla, There might be an argument because Ignatief is older and has more seniority.....;-):lol:
King Iggy – Canada or the Liberal Party’s Savior – What do you think?
- Thread starter Goober
- Start date
I don't know Talloola. Ignatief and Iginla, There might be an argument because Ignatief is older and has more seniority.....;-):lol:
MacLeans' has referred to Ignatieff as "The Czar". If your memory serves you well Goober, it was Capt. Morgan (Canada.com) who chritianed Ignatieff as "King Iggy" in reference to the coalition "alliance"
Tallola
What is your opinion on the coalition from hell – I think that this act will be the final nail in Jack’s coffin -
Goober again I ask...
So is Harper as much or more of a traitor then Ignatieff as he was leader when he signed ?
Yes or No ?
So is Harper as much or more of a traitor then Ignatieff as he was leader when he signed ?
Yes or No ?
Sir Francis 2004
Harper was indeed the leader – Ignatieff as we know was the Anointed One – Caucus would go which ever way Iggy went, can you dispute that fact of life?– Dion was dead and rotting in his position as leader – you know that as well as I -
Ah yes Goober, your best trait has not left you.. You still refuse to answer a question with a straight answer..
The answer is simple..
If you believe in the Canadian Constitution then neither were traitors.
If you believe the Candian Constitution is flawed then they were both but more so Harper as he was a Leader..
Personally I believe the first so your buddy Harper would not have been a Traitor but neither was Ignatieff..
He was Anointed by the legal process within the Party that all agreed on. Personally I think it stinks myself but it is legal. What about a process that is legal do you not understand :?:
Sir Francis 2004
What is it about a process that stinks to high heaven – What is it that makes it legal yet not right – If that is the tack that leads you in life I would be quite surprised about that.
Goober, the same rule apply in all parties so they do not get caught Leaderless as this was almost the case..
So what is the gripe ?
The Party will get to vote and chose to keep Mr Ignatieff or turf him ( God forbid ) in the upcoming Convention in Vancouver BC.. His job is as anyone else's which says little about our economy and global markets.
SFP 2004
I hope you do not mind the abbreviation, if it does just let me know –
Question – who is Iggy running against – No one – the party would not have been leaderless, they still had that corpse call Stephane – The old time power brokers have their man and he will have debts to pay just as he would have debts if the Coalition of the Dumb had gone thru.
How do you get SFP ??
How about SF2004 ?
In any case it was not my choice and the party will decide if Ignatieff is to stay or leave.. Dion didn't want the job anymore and you know it. He had quit and time was short. The coalition had it's purpose and did it's job. It exposed the NDP and Bloc while bringing out the document Harper wished he had never signed.
Once again if Liberals don't like Ignatieff, they will have a say with no more budget in the way.
So Goober:
Why are you now so intent on detracting from Ignatieff? Originally you were a assassin of Dion, happy to crap on him according to Party line or even the worst of the attack ads...all of a sudden no Ignatieff is a threat and someone you need to disrpespect - why is that?
As for his becoming leader of the Liberal Party, how different is that from the betrayals and backroom sleaze that let Harpo become the leader despite Party affiliation for MacKay and the backstabbing of David Orchard?
Aren't they all a bit dirty?
But why have you changed your tack from crapping on Dion to trying to find a way, albeit beyond your capability, to smear Ignatieff?
Who do you work for Goober?
Why are you now so intent on detracting from Ignatieff? Originally you were a assassin of Dion, happy to crap on him according to Party line or even the worst of the attack ads...all of a sudden no Ignatieff is a threat and someone you need to disrpespect - why is that?
As for his becoming leader of the Liberal Party, how different is that from the betrayals and backroom sleaze that let Harpo become the leader despite Party affiliation for MacKay and the backstabbing of David Orchard?
Aren't they all a bit dirty?
But why have you changed your tack from crapping on Dion to trying to find a way, albeit beyond your capability, to smear Ignatieff?
Who do you work for Goober?
He did not quit, he was forced out (not officially of course), with the help of the gullible Canadian public. And Ignatief wasn't some emergency measure, the Liberals exec have had their eye on him for a while.
A lot of very rich people want Ignatief in office, now that Harper has not worked out. Money talks and Dion sucks at it--in English at least. ;-)
dion would have amputated his own foot to be able to stay as Leader. He hadn't wanted to leave until a leadeship convention, but with Harper rapidly self destructing, the Liberals forced him out to go with a stronger leader.
The coalition did serve it's purpose. It very nearly gave Harpo a coronary and he had to underhandedly (sic) suspend democracy to save his butt